Triggers of contingency in mathematics teaching

References

• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). London: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (1976). Decision-making, the intervening variable. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(1–2), 41–47. doi:10.1007/BF00144357
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (2001). Educating student teachers about values in mathematics education. In F.-L Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 233–246). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222. doi:10.2307/749118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (1981). Number operations. In K. Hart (Ed.), Children's understanding of mathematics (pp. 11–16). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, D. (2007). “You don’t need a tables book when you have butter beans!” Is there a need for mathematics pedagogy here? In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1856–1865). Nicosia: Department of Education, University of Cyprus. ( Compact Disk)
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, D. (2008). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching: A three-tiered study of Irish pre-service primary teachers ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 281–303. doi:10.1080/002202700182763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfEE. (1998). National numeracy strategy, framework for teaching mathematics: Reception to year 6. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, M., Rowland, T., & Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 689–704. doi:10.1080/0141192022000015543a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2002). What are the attributes of excellent teachers? In B. Webber (Ed.), Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? (pp. 3–26). Wellington: Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J. (1991). Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes. In E. von Glaserfield (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 53–74). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 33–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lunzer, E. (1968). Formal reasoning. In E. Lunzer & J. Morris (Eds.), Development in human learning. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1988). Learning and doing mathematics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, K. (1978–1979). Capturing inflight decisions: Thoughts while teaching. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 722–741). New York, NY: Macmillan and the Association of Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978–1979). Planning in classroom reality: An in-depth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 83–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. (2008). Researching teachers’ mathematics disciplinary knowledge. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education:Vol.1. Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 273–298). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. (2010). Back to the data: Jason, and Elliot's quarters. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 97–104). Belo Horizonte: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Ruthven, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematical knowledge in teaching. London and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A., & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: Reflecting on practice with the Knowledge Quartet. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: Opportunities taken and opportunities missed. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 137–153. doi:10.1080/14926156.2013.784825
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4–15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y. (1989). The practice of mathematics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (2011). Mathematical content knowledge revealed through the foundation dimension of the KQ. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 281–288). Ankara: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar