Responding in-the-moment: learning to prepare for the unexpected

References

• Ayalon, M., Lerman, S., & Watson, A. (2014). Progression towards understanding functions: What does spatial generalisation contribute? In S. Pope (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th British Congress of Mathematics Education. Retrieved from www.bsrlm.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. (1938–1980). La Formation de l’Esprit Scientifique [Training in Scientific Method]. Paris: J. Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. Grouws, T. Cooney, & D. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on research on mathematics education (pp. 27–46). Mahwah, NJ: NCTM and Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bauersfeld, H. (1995). ‘Language games’ in the mathematics classroom: Their function and their effects. In P. Cobb & H.Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 271–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (1964). Energies: Material, vital, cosmic. London: Coombe Springs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (1976). Noticing. The Sherborne Theme Talks Series 2. Sherborne: Coombe Springs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucke, R. (1901). Cosmic consciousness. Philadelphia, PA: Innes & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Petersen, P. (1986). Teachers thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Geest, E. (2006). Energy transactions in the learning of mathematics. ( Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1902–1971). The child and the curriculum. In The child and the curriculum and the school and society (19–31). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 198–220). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Gattegno, C. (1990). The science of education. New York, NY: Educational Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Guillery, R. (2014). A neuroscientist's view of action, perception and the self. Oxford Magazine. Fifth week, Hilary Term. pp. 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication. M. Cooke (Ed.), (pp. 307–342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, P., & Guillery, R. (2014). Letters to the editor. Oxford Magazine. Second week, Trinity term, pp. 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, D. (1994). The principle of economy in the learning and teaching of mathematics. ( Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. (1964). How children fail. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, J. (1997). A passion for the possible: A guide to realizing your true potential. San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, L. (1968). Frames of mind. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890–1950). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice (Nobel Prize Lecture). In T.Frangsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel. Retrieved November 2013, from www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast, thinking slow. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K.Holyoak & R.Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (267–293).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations (J. Worral & E. Zahar Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lagrange, J.-B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In A.Bishop, M.Clements, C.Keitel, & F.Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 237–269). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 105–126. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-4833-1
   Google Scholar
• MacGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacHale, D. (1980). The predictability of counterexamples. American Mathematical Monthly, 87, 752.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Causes and consequences of emotional interactions. In D.McLeod & V.Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 3–19). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions for learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning — 1: Outcome and process. British Journal Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason J. (1994). Professional development and practitioner research. Chreods, 7, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 243–267. doi:10.1023/A:1009973717476
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2009). Teaching as disciplined enquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 205–223. doi:10.1080/13540600902875308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2012). On knowing in mathematics. CULMS, 5, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004a). Designing and using mathematical tasks, Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004b). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 277–289. doi:10.1007/BF00312078
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Spence, M. (2000). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing–to act in the moment. In D. Turosh (Ed.), Forms of mathematical knowledge: Learning and teaching with understanding (pp. 135--161). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, K. (1978). Capturing inflight decisions: Thoughts while teaching. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P.Winston, (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–280). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Movshovits-Hadar, N. (1988). School mathematics theorems - an endless source of surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Norretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size (J.Sydenham, Trans.). London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Ouspensky, P. (1950). In search of the miraculous: Fragments of an unknown teaching. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, T., & Leron, U. (2009). The slippery road from actions on objects to functions and variables. JRME, 40(1), 18–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindra, R. (2009). The wisdom of patañjali’s yoga sutras: A new translation and guide. Sandpoint: Morning Light Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, L. (1972). To live within. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rhadakrishnan, S. (1953). The principal Upanishads. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L. (1968/2003). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupil’s intellectual development. Carmarthen: Crown House.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the “knowledge quartet”: A framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: Opportunities taken and opportunities missed. CJSMTE, 13(2), 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: MacMillan,
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. (2004). A framework for understanding the relationship between students’ conceptualizations of mathematics and their developing pedagogy. In D.McDougal & J.Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of PME-NA 26 (Vols. 3, pp. 1290–1291). Toronto: OISE. Retrieved from http://www.pmena.org/2004/PMENA2004_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1976). Relational and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, J. (1726). Gulliver’s travels. (H.Davis ed.). (Vols. XI, p. 267). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Villani, C. (2015). Birth of a theorem: A mathematical adventure. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar