References
- Arafeh, S., Smerdon, B., & Snow, S. (2001, April). Learning from teachable moments: Methodological lessons from the secondary analysis of the TIMSS video study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
- Artigue, M. (1998). Teacher training as a key issue for the integration of computer technologies. In D. Tinsley & D. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC3/WG3.1 working conference on secondary school mathematics in the world of communication technology: Learning, teaching, and the curriculum: Information and communications technologies in school mathematics (Vol. 119, pp. 121–129). London: Chapman and Hall.
- Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274. doi:10.1023/A:1022103903080
- Bretscher, N. (2014). Exploring the quantitative and qualitative gap between expectation and implementation: A survey of English mathematics teachers’ uses of ICT. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (Vol. 2, pp. 43–70). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Clark-Wilson, A. (2008). Evaluating TI-NspireTM in secondary mathematics classrooms: Research report. University of Chichester: Chichester.
- Clark-Wilson, A. (2009). Connecting mathematics in the connected classroom: TI-NspireTM NavigatorTM. University of Chichester: Chichester.
- Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). How does a multi-representational mathematical ICT tool mediate teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical knowledge concerning variance and invariance? ( PhD thesis). London: Institute of Education.
- Clark-Wilson, A. (2013). Using mathematical technologies - Learning from lesson hiccups. Mathematics Teaching, 236, 31–33.
- Clark-Wilson, A. (2014). A methodological approach to researching teachers’ knowledge in a multi-representational technological setting. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (pp. 277–296). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Clark-Wilson, A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Vahey, P., & Roschelle, J. (2015). Scaling a technology-based innovation: Windows on the evolution of mathematics teachers’ practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(1), 79–92. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0635-6
- Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclair, N. (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Sage.
- Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From text to lived resources: Mathematics curriculum material and teacher development. Berlin: Springer.
- Hegedus, S. J., & Roschelle, J. (2013). The SimCalc vision and contributions. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics education and technology - rethinking the Terrain: The 17th ICMI study. Berlin: Springer.
- Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1993). Microworlds/schoolworlds: The transformation of an innovation Learning from Computers: Mathematics education and technology (NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 121) (, pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, P. (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 309–326. doi:10.1007/s10758-004-3469-4
- Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Vahey, P., & Roschelle, J. (2013). Cornerstone mathematics: Designing digital technology for teacher adaptation and scaling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 1057–1070. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0540-4
- Kaput, J., & Roschelle, J. (1998). The mathematics of change and variation from a millennial perspective: Now content, new context. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 155–170). London: Springer-Verlag.
- Laborde, C., & Laborde, J.-M. (1995). What about a learning environment where Euclidean concepts are manipulated with a mouse? In A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, & R. Noss (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 241–262) (NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 146). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Noss, R., Sutherland, R., & Hoyles, C. (1991). Final report of the Microworlds project Vol. II: Teacher attitudes and interactions (Report No. 0854733434). London: Institute of Education.
- Office for Standards in Education. (2009). Mathematics: Understanding the score, improving practice in mathematics teaching at secondary level. London: Office for Standards in Education.
- Office for Standards in Education. (2012). Mathematics: Made to measure. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate.
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2013). SimCalc at scale: Three studies examine the integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics. In S. J. Hegedus & J. Roschelle (Eds.), The SimCalc vision and contributions (pp. 125–144). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5
- Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Stacey, K. (2008, May). Pedagogical maps for describing teaching with technology. Paper presented at Sharing Inspiration Conference, Berlin.
- Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States (NCES 1999-074). Washington, DC; National Center for Education Statistics.
- Stockero, S., & Van Zoest, L. (2013). Characterizing pivotal teaching moments in beginning mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 125–147. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9222-3
- Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281–307. doi:10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5
- Turner, F., & Rowland, T. (2011). The knowledge quartet as an organising framework. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 195–212). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Vahey, P., Knudsen, J., Rafanan, K., & Lara-Meloy, T. (2013). Curricular activity systems supporting the use of dynamic representations to foster students’ deep understanding of mathematics. In C. Mouza & N. Lavigne (Eds.), Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Springer.