Dragging maintaining symmetry: can it generate the concept of inclusivity as well as a family of shapes?

References

• Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34(3), 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2010). Generating conjectures in dynamic geometry: The maintaining dragging model. International Journal of Computing in Mathematics Learning, 15, 225–253. doi:10.1007/s10758-010-9169-3
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics thinking and learning (pp. 843–908). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, W. F., & Shaugnessy, J. M. (1986) Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48. doi:10.2307/749317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble. L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research methods in education. London: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Dabell, J. (2014). Faulty rectangles. Mathematics Teaching, 239, 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Design-based research collective. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational enquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Evens, H., & Houssart, J. (2007). Paired interviews in mathematics education. In D. Kuchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (p. 27). http://m.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip27-2/BSRLM-IP-27-2-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, S. K. (2011). Current report: Developing perceptions of symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 225–226. doi:10.1080/14794802.2011.585833
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 3–20. doi:10.1080/14794800008520167
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Herbert. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackiw, N. (2001). The Geometers Sketchpad version 4.0 [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackiw, N., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Sounds and pictures: Dynamism and dualism in dynamic geometry. ZDM, 41, 413–426. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0196-2
   Google Scholar
• Leung, A. (2008). Dragging in a dynamic geometry environment through the lens of variation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13, 135–157. doi: 10.1007/s10758-008-9130-x
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Real, F., & Leung, A. (2006). Dragging as a conceptual tool in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37, 665–679. doi: 10.1080/00207390600712539
   Google Scholar
• Mamon Erez, M., & Yerushalmy, M., 2007. “If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle … ” Young students experience the dragging tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11, 271–299. doi:10.1007/s10758-006-9106-7
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1998) Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 243–267. doi: 10.1023/A:1009973717476
   Google Scholar
• Okazaki, M. (2009). Process and means of reinterpreting tacit properties in understanding the inclusion relations between quadrilaterals. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 249–256). http://www.igpme.org/index.php/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Papademetri-Kachrimani, C. (2012). Revisiting Van Hiele. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(3), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., Healy, L., & Sales, C. O. R. (2009). Time for telling stories: Narrative thinking with dynamic geometry. ZDM, 41, 441–452. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0180-x
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., Gray, E., Ali, M. B., Crowley, L., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M., …  Yusof, Y. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 1(1), 81–104. doi: 10.1080/14926150109556452
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 151–169. doi:10.1007/BF00305619
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2009). How to do your research project. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and Insight. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar