Investigating teachers’ appraisal of unexpected moments and underlying values: an exploratory case in the context of changing mathematics classroom discourse

References

• Barnes, D. (1969). Language in the secondary classroom. In D. Barnes, J. Britton, & M. Torbe (Eds.), Language, the learner and the school (pp. 11–77). Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (1998). Culture, values and assessment in mathematics. In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East asia regional conference on mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 27–37). Seoul, Korea: Korea Society of Mathematical Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (1999). Mathematics teaching and values education – An intersection in the need of research. ZDM, 31, 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s11858-999-0001-2
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 93–104). New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110, 608–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., & O'Connor, C. (2004). Project Challenge: Identifying and developing talent in mathematics within low-income urban schools. Report No. 1. Boston, MA: Boston University School of Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cirillo, M., Steele, M. D., Otten, S., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., McAneny, K., & Riser, J. Q. (2014). Teacher discourse moves: Supporting productive and powerful discourse. In K. Karp (Ed.), 2015 Annual perspectives on mathematics education: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 141–149). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A. J., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Methodology challenges and constraints in the VAMP Project. In Proceedings of the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics Conference. Taipei, Republic of China.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258–277. doi: 10.2307/749781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. (2000). History as discourse: Construals of time, cause and appraisal (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of New South Wales, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem solving. In Utrecht (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st PME Conference (pp. 209–216). Lahti, Finland: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, Y. (2015). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ preferences regarding values about mathematics teaching in Turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 227–255. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9483-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009). Explanation in mathematics classrooms: A discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 9, 86–99. doi: 10.1080/14926150902942072
   Google Scholar
• Fasheh, M. (1982). Mathematics, culture, and authority. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Lisa, J., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together!: Collaboration and equity in elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• FitzSimons, G., Seah, W., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in the mathematics classroom. 24th Annual MERGA Conference, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1, 49–57. doi: 10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In Herbel-Eisenmann, Choppin, Wagner, & Pimm (Eds.) Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies (pp. 28–50). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms (Doctoral Dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Cirillo, M., Steele, M. D., Otten, S., & Johnson, K. (In press). Mathematics discourse in secondary classrooms: A case-based professional development program.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Drake, C., & Cirillo, M. (2009). “Muddying the clear waters”: Teachers’ take-up of the linguistic idea of revoicing. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 25(2), 268–277. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: The importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313–345. doi: 10.1007/s10857-006-9012-x
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Steele, M. D., & Cirillo, M. (2013). (Developing) teacher discourse moves: A framework for professional development. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(2), 181–196. doi: 10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0181
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2011). Strength in numbers: Collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a Math-Talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81. doi: 10.2307/30034933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kan, C. A., Ponte, P., & Verloop, N. (2013). How do teachers legitimize their classroom interactions in terms of educational values and ideals? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(6), 610–633. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2013.827452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Handbook II: Affective domain). New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 116–126. doi: 10.1017/S026719050020007X
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. (2009). Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of black children. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Appraisal: Negotiating attitudes. In Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (pp. 22–65). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230511910
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, V., & Chang, P. (2010). The language of engagement in two highly interactive undergraduate mathematics classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 83–100. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A Study of Whole Classroom Mathematical Discourse and Teacher Change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175–207. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. (1999). Pronouns in mathematics talk: Power vagueness and generalisation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Seah, W. T., & Andersson, A. (2015). Valuing diversity in mathematics pedagogy through the volitional nature and alignment of values. In A. Bishop, H. Tan, & T. Barkatsas (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education: Towards inclusive practices. (pp. 167–183). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the worlds’ teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2014). Improving th alignment between values, principles, and classroom realities. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathmatics curriculum in school education (pp. 621–636). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: a case of a teacher's early experience in a new context. ZDM, 46(6), 871–882. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0587-x
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. doi: 10.2307/749877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2015). Affect in mathematics education: An Introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2
   Google Scholar