743
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measuring pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in tutoring children in primary mathematics: an instrument

&

References

  • Andrich, D. (1999). Rating scale model. In G. N. Masters & J. P. Keeves (Eds.), Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment (pp. 110–121). Oxford: Pergammon.
  • Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics (Vol. 19). Brussels/Geneva: International Academy of Education.
  • Arp, K. C. (1999). The relationship of preservice preparation to teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics and teaching middle school mathematics.
  • Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1982). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: Toward an ecological model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • Baghaei, P. (2008). The Rasch model as a construct validation tool. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22(1), 1145–1146.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, (307–337) Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Bond, T. (2004). Validity and assessment: A Rasch measurement perspective. Metodologia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 179–194.
  • Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
  • Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. (Vol. 402). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Briley, J. S. (2012). The relationships among mathematics teaching efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematical beliefs for elementary pre-service teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5, 1–13.
  • Brown, A. B. (2012). Non-traditional preservice teachers and their mathematics efficacy beliefs. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 191–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00132.x
  • Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125–142. doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9084-2
  • Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 247–266. doi: 10.1007/BF00058659
  • Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
  • Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1986). The first year of teacher preparation: Transition to pedagogical thinking? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(3), 239–256. doi: 10.1080/0022027860180302
  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  • Gresham, G. (2007). A study of mathematics anxiety in pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 181–188. doi: 10.1007/s10643-007-0174-7
  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30. doi: 10.1086/428763
  • Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
  • Huinker, D., & Enochs, L. (1995). Mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument (MTEBI). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research.
  • Kieftenbeld, V., Natesan, P., & Eddy, C. (2011). An item response theory analysis of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(5), 443–454. doi: 10.1177/0734282910391062
  • Kinach, B. M. (2002). Understanding and Learning-to-explain by representing mathematics: epistemological dilemmas facing teacher educators in the secondary mathematics “methods” course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(2), 153–186. doi: 10.1023/A:1015822104536
  • Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
  • Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2000). Comparing “partial credit models” (PCM) and “rating scale models (RSM). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 14(3), 768.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2014a). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program User's Guide. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2014b). Winsteps® (Version 3.81.0) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com. Retrieved January 1, 2014, from http://www.winsteps.com/
  • Marshall, J. M. (2009). Describing the elephant: Preservice teachers talk about spiritual reasons for becoming a teacher. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 25–44.
  • Mellin-Olsen, S. (1996). Oppgavediskursen i matematikk [The discourse of tasks in mathematics; in Norwegian]. Bergen: Tangenten.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 243–261. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Pampaka, M., Hutcheson, G., & Williams, J. (2014). Quality of learning support for mathematics in transition to university. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(2), 97–118.
  • Pampaka, M., Williams, J., Hutcheson, G., Wake, G., Black, L., Davis, P., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2012). The association between mathematics pedagogy and learners’ dispositions for university study. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 473–496. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.555518
  • Phelps, C. M. (2010). Factors that pre-service elementary teachers perceive as affecting their motivational profiles in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 293–309. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9257-2
  • Relich, J. (1996). Gender, self-concept and teachers of mathematics: Effects on attitudes to teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(2), 179–195. doi: 10.1007/BF00302629
  • Riggs, I. (1988). The development of an elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy belief instrument (Dissertation Abstracts International).
  • Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730740605
  • Ross, J. A. (1994). Beliefs that make a difference: The origins and impacts of teacher efficacy.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1037/h0092976
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
  • Schraw, G., Potenza, M. T., & Nebelsick-Gullet, L. (1993). Constraints on the calibration of performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(4), 455–463. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1034
  • Sideridis, G. D. (2005). Noisy responding and intervention effectiveness. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(2), 1013–1014.
  • Smestad, B., Eriksen, E. I., Martinussen, G., & Tellefsen, H. K. (2012). Lærerstudenters erfaringer med-og holdninger til-matematikkfaget.
  • Smith III, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387–402. doi: 10.2307/749874
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. doi: 10.3102/00346543068002202
  • Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 747–766. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.009
  • Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. Jr. (2007a). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part I - Instrument development tools. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(1), 97–123.
  • Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. Jr. (2007b). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II--Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204–234.
  • Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81–91. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.81
  • Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Rasch Measurement.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.