Four (algorithms) in one (bag): an integrative framework of knowledge for teaching the standard algorithms of the basic arithmetic operations

References

• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 2005, 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 5–34. doi: 10.1007/BF01273293
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, P. M., & Kanive, R. (2014). Number of repetitions required to retain single-digit multiplication math facts for elementary students. School Psychology Quarterly. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3–20. doi: 10.2307/749715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics – for – teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 293–319. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-2372-4
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. (2003). Toward computation fluency in multidigit multiplication and division. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(6), 300–305.
   Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. (2012–13). Standard algorithms in the common core state standards. NCSM Journal, 14(2), 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, J., & Gregg, D. U. (2007). Interpreting the standard division algorithm in a “candy factory” context. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(1), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle, F. (1939). Constancy of error in learning division with a two – Figure divisor. The Journal of Educational Research, 33, 189–196. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1939.10880903
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351. doi: 10.2307/30034819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic – Specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 39(4), 372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L. & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An Exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Hellinen, A. (2010). Finnish pre-service teachers’ and upper secondary students’ understanding of division and reasoning strategies used. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 247–261. doi: 10.1007/s10649-009-9213-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koichu, B., Zaslavsky, O. & Dolev, L. (2015). Effects of variations in task design on mathematics teachers’ learning experiences: A case of a sorting task. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10857-015-9302-2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E. (2007). Making sense of the traditional long division algorithm. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory – Based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 349–371. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9071-z
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. F. (2009). Goal of long division. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(8), 482–487.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, A. (1998). Teaching mental algorithms constructively. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kennedy (Eds.), The teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics (1998 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), (pp. 44–48). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for teaching mathematics. Reston: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, P. M. (2007). Lattice multiplication in a preservice classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(2), 110–113.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Beyond local conceptual connections: Meta-knowledge about procedures. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(3), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Raveh, I., & Koichu, B. (2013). A reference framework for teaching the standard algorithms of the four basic arithmetic operations: From theoretical analysis to task design. CERME8, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘knowledge quartet’: A framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. D. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 233–254. doi: 10.2307/749346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 217–237. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9038-8
   Google Scholar
• Tchoshanov, M. A. (2011). Relationship between teacher knowledge of concepts and connections, teaching practice, and student achievement in middle grades mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 141–164. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9269-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers conceptions of multidigit whole numbers: Refining a framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 241–251. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9252-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanheiser, E. (2014). Developing prospective teachers’ conceptions with well-designed tasks: Explaining successes and analyzing conceptual difficulties. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 141–172. doi: 10.1007/s10857-014-9272-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Mathematics-related tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators: The dynamics associated with tasks in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 433–440. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9060-x
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional, Vol. 4, of T. Wood (Series Ed.), The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 93–114). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O., & Sullivan, P. (Eds.) (2011). Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics: Tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning (320 pp.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar