486
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers’ mathematics as mathematics-at-work

&

References

  • Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270–296.
  • Bakker, A. (2014). Characterising and developing vocational mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 151–156. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9560-4
  • Ball, D. L., et al. (2009). RF01: Teacher knowledge and teaching. Proceedings of PME-33 (vol. 1, pp. 121–150). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Proceedings of the 2002 meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, Canada: CMESG.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Bass, H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 42, 417–431. doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-05-01072-4
  • Bednarz, N. (2012). Formation mathématique des enseignants, état des lieux, questions et perspectives. In J. Proulx, C. Corriveau & H. Squalli (Eds.), Formation mathématique pour l’enseignement des mathématiques: pratiques, orientations et recherches (pp. 13–54). Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
  • Bednarz, N., Fiorentini, D., & Huang, R. (Eds.). (2011). International approaches to professional development for mathematics teachers. Ottawa, ON: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.
  • Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2009). Knowing and using mathematics in teaching: Conceptual and epistemological clarifications. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(3), 11–17.
  • Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2010a). Processus de recherche-formation et développement professionnel des enseignants de mathématiques: Exploration de mathématiques enracinées dans leurs pratiques. Éducation & Formation, e-293, 21–36.
  • Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2010b). De quel contexte parle-t-on? Une exploitation de mathématiques professionnelles avec les enseignants. Proceedings of 2010 meeting of Groupe de Didactique des Mathématiques du Québec (pp. 182–192). Moncton, N.-B.: GDM.
  • Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2011). Spécificité du travail mathématique de l’enseignant: un ancrage pour la formation continue. Proceedings of the conference “Le travail enseignant au XXIe siècle”. Lyon, France: INRP. CD-ROM.
  • Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2014). The (relativity of the) whole as a fundamental dimension in the conceptualization of the fraction concept. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 2, 27–54.
  • Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x
  • Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1987). Written and oral mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 83–97. doi: 10.2307/749244
  • Cognard, B. (1996). Étude de l’utilisation des graphiques des lois de l’offre et de la demande chez les étudiants du secondaire et du collegial (Masters’ thesis). Canada: Université du Québec à Montréal.
  • Corriveau, C. (2013). Explicitation des manières de faire les mathématiques des enseignants du secondaire et du postsecondaire pour mieux comprendre les enjeux de transition. In N. Bednarz (Ed.), Recherche collaborative et pratique enseignante (pp. 231–264). Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Coulon, A. (1993). Ethnométhodologie et éducation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293-319. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-2372-4
  • Educational Studies in Mathematics. (2014). Special issue: Characterising and developing vocational mathematical knowledge. 86(2).
  • Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study. New York, US: Springer.
  • For the Learning of Mathematics. (2009). Special issue: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching, 29(3).
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (1995). Making space: A comparison of mathematical work at school and in professional design practice. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 188–143). London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Hamel, J. (1997). Étude de cas et sciences sociales. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 4–27. doi: 10.2307/749619
  • Huillet, D. (2009). Mathematics for teaching: An anthropological approach and its use in teaching training. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(3), 4–10.
  • Janvier, C. (1989). Representation and contextualization. Proceedings of PME-13 (pp. 139–146). Paris: PME.
  • Janvier, C., Baril, M., & Mary, C. (1992). Contextual reasoning of electrical technicians. Les Cahiers du CIRADE, 1, 155–169.
  • Jaworski, B. (2011). Situating mathematics teacher education in a global context. In N. Bednarz, D. Fiorentini, & R. Huang (Eds.), International approaches to professional development for mathematics teachers (pp. 2–50). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
  • Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R. (2011). Measurement in the workplace: The case of process improvement in manufacturing industry. ZDM, 43, 747–758. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0359-9
  • Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A perspective on proving processes in secondary mathematics classroom interactions. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 75–101). Springer: Dordrecht.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Masingila, J. O. (1994). Mathematics practice in carpet laying. Anthropology and Education Quaterly, 25, 430–462. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1994.25.4.04x0531k
  • Milroy, W. L. (1992). An ethnographic study of the mathematical ideas of a group of carpenters. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph volume 5. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Nadeau, D., & Proulx, J. (2013). Preservice teachers’ views of their mathematical preparation in advanced mathematics. Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353–360). Kiel, Germany: PME.
  • Noss, R. (2002). Mathematical epistemologies at work. Proceedings of PME-26 (vol. 1, pp. 47–63). Norwich, England: PME.
  • Noss, R., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Kent, P. (2007). Situating graphs as workplace knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 367–384. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9058-9
  • Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). The visibility of meanings: Modelling the mathematics of banking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 3–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00191470
  • Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2002). Abstraction in expertise: A study of nurses’ conceptions of concentration. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 204–229. doi: 10.2307/749725
  • Noss, R., Pozzi, S., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Touching epistemologies: Meanings of average and variation in nursing practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 25–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1003763812875
  • Pastré, P. (2007). Quelques réflexions sur l’organisation de l’activité enseignante. Recherche et Formation, 56, 81–93. doi: 10.4000/rechercheformation.907
  • Pozzi, S., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 105–122. doi: 10.1023/A:1003216218471
  • Proulx, J., & Bednarz, N. (2009). Resources used and “activated” by teachers when making sense of mathematical situations. Proceedings of PME-33 (Vol. 4, pp. 417–424). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
  • Proulx, J., & Bednarz, N. (2010). Enhancing teachers’ mathematics of their practice: A professional development project. Proceedings of PME-34 (Vol. 4, pp. 65–72). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
  • Rowland, T., Jared, L., & Thwaites, A. (2011). Secondary mathematics teachers’ content knowledge: The case of Heidi. Proceedings of CERME-7 (pp. 2827–2837). Rzeszow, Poland: CERME.
  • Rowland, T., & Ruthven, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematical knowledge in teaching. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Saboya, M. (2010). Élaboration et analyse d’une intervention didactique co-construite entre chercheur et enseignant (Ph.D dissertation). Université du Québec à Montréal.
  • Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teacher's seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 55–87. doi: 10.1023/A:1009911200478
  • Schliemann, A. D., & Nunes, T. (1990). A situated schema of proportionality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(3), 259–268. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00841.x
  • Shell Centre for Mathematics Education. (1985). The language of functions and graphs. Joint Matriculation Board/Shell Centre, Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Viewing “mathematics for teaching” as a form of applied mathematics: Implications for the mathematical preparation of teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 61(3), 266–276. doi: 10.1090/noti1087
  • Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2010). Mathematics for teaching: A form of applied mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.022
  • Sullivan, P., & Wood, T. (2008). Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Thompson, P. W., & Thompson A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, part I: A teacher’s struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 279–303. doi: 10.2307/749339
  • Traoré, K., & Bednarz, N. (2009). Mathématiques de la vie quotidienne au Burkina Faso: une analyse de la pratique sociale de comptage et de vente de mangues. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 359–378. doi: 10.1007/s10649-009-9200-6
  • Usiskin, Z. (2001). Teachers’ mathematics: A collection of content deserving to be a field. National Summit on the Mathematical Education of Teachers. http://cbmsweb.org/NationalSummit/WG_Speakers/usiskin.pdf
  • William, J., Wake, G., & Boreham, N. C. (2001). School or college mathematics and workplace practice: An activity theory perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 3, 69–83. doi: 10.1080/14794800008520085
  • Williams, J., & Wake, G. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 317–343. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9039-z
  • Zeverenberg, R. J. (2011). Young workers and their dispositions towards mathematics: Tensions of a mathematical habitus in the retail industry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9267-0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.