813
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Preservice teachers’ video simulations and subsequent noticing: a practice-based method to prepare mathematics teachers

Pages 217-235 | Received 14 Jul 2016, Accepted 31 Mar 2017, Published online: 31 May 2017

References

  • Amador, J., Estapa, A., De Araujo, Z., Weston, T., & Kosko, K. (2017). Eliciting and analyzing preservice teachers’ mathematical noticing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5, 158–177. doi: 10.5951/mathteaceduc.5.2.0158
  • Amador, J., & Weiland, I. (2016). Conversational affordances and constraints of professional noticing during preservice teacher lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, online first.
  • Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 453–464. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2014.912627
  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi: 10.1177/0022487109348479
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausolito, CA: Math Solutions.
  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Dobber, M., Akkerman, S., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. (2014). Regulating collaboration in teacher education. Research Papers in Education, 29, 69–92. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2012.749506
  • Dyer, E., & Sherin, M. (2016). Instructional reasoning about interpretations of student thinking that supports responsive teaching in secondary mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 69–82. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0740-1
  • Fernandez, M. L., & Zilliox, J. (2011). Investigating approaches to lesson study in prospective mathematics teacher education. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 85–102). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Fernández, M. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 351–362. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.012
  • Griffiths, J. (2016). Bridging the school placement gap with peer micro-teaching lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5, 227–238. doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0035
  • Grossman, P. L., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
  • Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184–205. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312906
  • Heng, M., & Sudarshan, A. (2013). “Bigger number means you plus!”—teachers learning to use clinical interviews to understand students’ mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 471–485. doi: 10.1007/s10649-013-9469-3
  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
  • Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.001
  • Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129–141). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. doi: 10.1177/0022487112473837
  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. (2012). Improving teaching does improve teachers: Evidence from lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 368–375. doi: 10.1177/0022487112446633
  • Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 35–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. doi: 10.1177/0022487113493807
  • Morris, A. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471–505. doi: 10.1007/s10857-006-9015-7
  • Murata, A., Bofferding, L., Pothen, B., Taylor, M., & Wischnia, S. (2012). Making connections Among student learning, content, and teaching: Teacher talk paths in elementary mathematics lesson study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 616–650. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0616
  • Murata, A., & Pothen, B. (2011). Lesson study in preservice elementary mathematics methods courses: Connecting emerging practice and understanding. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 103–116). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Star, J. R., Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Star, J., & Strickland, S. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  • Stein, M., & Smith, M. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 585–609. doi: 10.1002/tea.21209
  • Tyminski, A., Zambak, V., Drake, C., & Land, T. (2014). Using representations, decomposition, and approximations of practices to support prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ practice of organizing discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 463–487. doi: 10.1007/s10857-013-9261-4
  • van Es, E. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 134–151). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 182–192. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
  • van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  • van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155–176. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
  • Weiland, I., Hudson, R., & Amador, J. (2014). Preservice formative assessment interviews: The development of competent questioning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 329–352. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9402-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.