A study of creative reasoning opportunities in assessments in undergraduate calculus courses

References

• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, E. (2005). How students verify conjectures: Teachers’ expectations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 171–191. doi: 10.1007/s10857-005-4797-6
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, E. (2007). Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 348–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, E. (2012). University mathematics teachers’ views on the required reasoning in calculus exams. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9(3), 371–407.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 89–105. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9242-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, E. (2014). Contrasts in mathematical challenges in A-level mathematics and further mathematics, and undergraduate mathematics examinations. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33, 213–229. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hru021
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. S., Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2005). Advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 15–25. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0701_2
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., Hanson, K., Nuñez, G., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Beyond plug and chug: An analysis of calculus I homework. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1, 268–287. doi: 10.1007/s40753-015-0012-z
   Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2005). Thoughts on learning advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25, 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of assessment in undergraduate mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 17–33. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2012.756634
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2015). Students’ preferences in undergraduate mathematics assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1046–1067. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.858683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., Glover, E., & Melhuish, K. (2015). Beyond good teaching: The benefits and challenges of implementing ambitious teaching. In D. Bressoud, V. Mesa, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and Recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus (pp. 93–105). Washington, DC: MAA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in school tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1003956417456
   Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276. doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
   Google Scholar
• Mac an Bhaird, C., Nolan, B., O’Shea, A., & Pfeiffer, K. (2014). An analysis of the opportunities for creative reasoning in undergraduate Calculus courses. Proceedings of the 2014 Science and Mathematics Education Conference (SMEC). Retrieved from https://dcu.ie/smec/2014/oral.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, W., & Merchant, S. (2016). Mathematical tasks, study approaches, and course grades in undergraduate mathematics: A year-by-year analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 373–387. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa, V. (2010). Strategies for controlling the work in mathematics textbooks for introductory calculus. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, 235–265.
   Google Scholar
• Pointon, A., & Sangwin, C. (2003). An analysis of undergraduate core material in the light of hand-held computer algebra systems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 671–686. doi: 10.1080/0020739031000148930
   Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472. doi: 10.1023/A:1003196224280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2015). The impact of instructor and institutional factors on students’ attitude. In D. M. Bressoud, V. Mesa, & C. L. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus (pp. 17–29). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Tallman, M. A., Carlson, M. P., Bressoud, D. M., & Pearson, M. (2016). A characterization of Calculus I final exams in U.S. colleges and universities. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2, 105–133. doi: 10.1007/s40753-015-0023-9
   Google Scholar
• Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• White, N. J., & Mesa, V. (2014). Describing cognitive orientation of calculus I tasks across different types of coursework. ZDM, 46(4), 675–690. doi:10.1007/s1185801405889 doi: 10.1007/s11858-014-0588-9
   Google Scholar