Mathematics summative assessment practices in schools at opposite ends of performance rankings in Portugal

References

• Arredondo, S. C., & Diago, J. C. (2009). Avaliação educacional e promoção escolar. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, J., Black, P., & Coffey, J. E. (2001). The relationship between formative and summative assessment: In the classroom and beyond. In J. Atkin, P. Black, & J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Classroom assessment and the national science education standards (pp. 59–78). Washington, DC: The National Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing: Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384–397. doi: 10.1177/0022487100051005006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1980). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 47–69). London: Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). The reliability of assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P., & Black, P. (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 7–26. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000208976
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students’ formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., & Magnini, B. (2005). Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, S., & Hodge, S. (2001). Enhancing student trust through peer assessment in physical education. Physical Educator, 58(1), 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Madaus, G., Horn, C., & Ramos, M. (2000). Retrospective on educational testing and assessment in the 20th century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 159–181. doi: 10.1080/002202700182691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J., & George, J. (2004). A handbook of techniques for formative evaluation: Mapping the students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R., Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2011). Enacting assessment for learning: The beliefs practice nexus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 365–379. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.526587
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D. (2005). Avaliação das aprendizagens: Desafios às teorias, práticas e políticas. Lisboa: Textos Editores, Lda.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D. (2006). Para uma teoria da avaliação formativa. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 19(2), 21–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D. (2010). Acerca da articulação de perspetivas e da construção teórica em avaliação educacional. In M. T. Esteban & A. J. Afonso (Orgs.), Olhares e interfaces (pp. 15–43). São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment for learning: A compelling conceptualization. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 197–204). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (2004). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Oxon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner, (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 103–117). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., Gipps, C., Broadfoot, P. e., & Nuttal, D. (1992). Assessment and the improvement of education. Curriculum Journal, 3(3), 215–230. doi: 10.1080/0958517920030302
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, C., & Fernandes, P. (2010). Desafios aos professores na construção de mudanças educacionais e curriculares: Que possibilidades e que constrangimentos? Educação, 33(3), 198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Luckesi, C. C. (2006). Avaliação da aprendizagem escolar. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R., & Onion, A. J. (2013). Assessment in mathematics education: Key debates. In D. Leslie & H. Mendick (Eds.), Debates in mathematics education (pp. 175–185). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matanin, M., & Tannehill, D. (1994). Assessing and grading in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13(4), 395–405. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.13.4.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C., & King, S. (2011). Does Assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 749–765. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.488792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, P. (1999). Avaliação: Da excelência à regulação das aprendizagens. Entre duas lógicas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2010). Curriculum for excellence: Transformational change or business as usual? Scottish Educational Review, 42(1), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1996). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shkedi, A. (2006). Curriculum and teachers: An encounter of languages and literatures. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 719–735. doi: 10.1080/00220270500221802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ssemugabi, S., & Villiers, R. (2007). A comparative study of two usability evaluation methods using a web-based e-learning application. Proceedings of the 2007 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries (pp. 132–142).
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sturman, L. (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Research, 45(3), 261–273. doi: 10.1080/0013188032000137256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos, C. (2006). Avaliação da aprendizagem: Práticas de mudança. Por uma práxis transformadora. São Paulo: Libertad.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: Why, what and how? London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537–548. doi: 10.1080/0141192960220502
   Google Scholar
• Tharenou, P., Donohue, R., & Cooper, B. (2007). Management research methods. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar