Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment: a secondary data analysis

References

• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014a). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Numeracy year 7 2014 (calculator, item 10). Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014b). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Numeracy year 7 2014 (Non calculator, item 22). Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014c). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: numeracy year 7 2014 (non calculator, item 31). Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). Australian F-10 curriculum: Mathematics (version 8). Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2016). Test development and review process. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from http://www.nap.edu.au/about/test-development
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Australian curriculum: General capabilities, numeracy. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/numeracy/introduction/introduction
   Google Scholar
• Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617. doi: 10.1348/000712608X377117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Large-scale assessment systems design principles drawn from international comparisons. Measurement, 5, 1–53. doi: 10.1080/15366360701293386
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, A., Longoni, A. M., & Vechhi, T. (2004). Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 519–532. doi: 10.1002/acp.1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, E. W. (2007). Secondary data analysis. In N. J. Salkind & K. Rasmussen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 870–877). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781412952644.n398
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities- A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, B. M. (2013). Individual and group differences in spatial ability. In D. Waller & L. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition (pp. 117–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, B. M., Pezaris, E., & Nuttall, R. L. (1992). Spatial ability as a predictor of math achievement: The importance of sex and handedness patterns. Neuropsychologia, 30, 35–45. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90012-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonna, L. (2013). Taxonomy and classification of data mining. SMU Science & Technology Law Review, 16, 309–369. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/comlrtj16&div=19&g_sent=1&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, C. S., Song, K., & Richardson, L. I. (2006). Do mathematical gender differences continue? A longitudinal study of gender difference and excellence in mathematics performance in the U.S. Educational Studies, 40, 279–295. doi: 10.1080/00131940701301952
   Google Scholar
• Doig, B. (2006). Large-scale mathematics assessment: Looking globally to act locally. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13, 265–288. doi: 10.1080/09695940601035403
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine, 17, 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., & Leder, G. S. (1990). Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2004). Core curriculum for basic education. Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., & Schorr, R. Y. (2004). Introduction. In W. A. Firestone, L. F. Monfils, & R. Y. Schorr (Eds.), The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, assessment, and educational reform (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 210–240. doi: 10.1257/app.2.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2013). Research design creating robust approaches for the social sciences. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Understanding spatial transformations: Similarities and differences between mental rotation and mental folding. Cognitive Processing, 14, 105–115. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0544-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, A. B., & Geiser, C. (2012). Cross-Cultural differences in spatial abilities and solution strategies – An investigation in Cambodia and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 533–557. doi: 10.1177/0022022111399646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745–756. doi: 10.3758/BF03200477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47, 389–401. doi: 10.1023/A:1021668724970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. T., Huang, T. Y., Lin, W. J., Chang, S. Y., Lin, Y. H., Ko, L. W., … Chang, E. C. (2012). Gender differences in wayfinding in virtual environments with global or local landmarks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi: 10.2307/1130467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–16. doi: 10.3102/0013189X029002004
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., & Wilson, M. (2009). Gender differences and similarities in PISA 2003 mathematics: A comparison between the United States and Hong Kong. International Journal of Testing, 9, 20–40. doi: 10.1080/15305050902733547
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25, 69–94. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 833–846. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning (pp. 174–191). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E., & Stumpf, H. (1993). Gender differences in academically talented young students’ mathematical reasoning: Patterns across age and subskills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 340–346. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Singapore. (2006). Mathematics syllabus primary. Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/maths-primary-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2011). Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1238–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing relationships: Using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics, and social studies. American Educator, 37, 26–40. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1006210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Studies Authority. (n.d.). NAPLAN report guides and handbooks. Retrieved April 18, 2016, from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/p-10/naplan/test-reporting-analysis/report-guides-handbooks
   Google Scholar
• Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2017). Measurement of spatial ability: Construction and validation of the spatial reasoning instrument for middle school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. doi: 10.1177/0734282916659207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Park, S. (2001). Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and science. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 52–73. doi: 10.1177/016235320102500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, D. M., Green, S. M., Leason, J., MacFadden, A., Bell, S., & Elias, L. J. (2002). Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 403–410. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.116.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950–958. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 367–373. doi: 10.1177/0963721413484756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, S., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi: 10.1037/a0016127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860–871. doi: 10.1037/a0019454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Carr, M. (2014). Working memory and strategy use contribute to gender differences in spatial ability. Educational Psychologist, 49, 261–282. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.960568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34, 1–24. doi: 10.3102/0091732X09350472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zancada-Menendez, C., Sampedro-Piquero, P., Lopez, L., & McNamara, T. P. (2016). Age and gender differences in spatial perspective taking. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 289–296. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0399-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar