Evaluating the potential of tasks to occasion mathematical creativity: definitions and measurements

References

• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Teaching for creativity with disciplined improvisation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 94–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, C., & Olsson, J. (2015). ICT-supported problem solving and collaborative creative reasoning: Exploring linear functions using dynamic mathematics software. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 48–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haylock, D. (1997). Recognising mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. ZDM Mathematics Education, 29(3), 68–74. doi: 10.1007/s11858-997-0002-y
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185–195. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2013). Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 167–181. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0467-1
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Cho, S., & Ahn, D. (2004). Development of mathematical creative problem solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Education International, 18(2), 164–174. doi: 10.1177/026142940301800206
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51–61. doi: 10.1007/BF03036784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31^st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul: The Korea Society of Education Studies in Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183–197. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8
   Google Scholar
• Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: Teachers’ choices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(4), 269–291. doi: 10.1007/s10857-012-9229-9
   Google Scholar
• Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D., Sophocleous, P., & Christou, C. (2013). Spatial visualizers, object visualizers and verbalizers: Their mathematical creative abilities. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 199–213. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0475-1
   Google Scholar
• Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 159–179. doi: 10.1007/s10649-009-9212-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 3, 75–80. doi: 10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J. M., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2007). The application of dual coding theory in multi-representational virtual mathematics environments. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31^st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 209–216). Seoul: The Korea Society of Education Studies in Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., Warren, E., & White, P. (2000). Students’ responses to content specific open-ended mathematical tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 2–17. doi: 10.1007/BF03217071
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2013). School mathematics and creativity at the elementary and middle grade level: How are they related? ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 227–238. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0471-5
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M. & Levenson, E. (in press). Creative mathematical thinking while solving a multiple solution task with infinitely many solutions. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, & K. Jones, (Eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity, and affect. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Personell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Tabach, M., & Levenson, E. (2010). Multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes – Is it a task for kindergarten children? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 217–231. doi: 10.1007/s10649-009-9215-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
   Google Scholar