Engaging children with ABA patterns on a computer tablet: filling in the blanks

References

• Babai, R., Levyadun, T., Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2006). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: A reaction time study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(8), 913–924. doi: 10.1080/00207390600794958
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman, K. (2016). Children’s play as a starting point for teaching shapes and patterns in the preschool. In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. L. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years – Results from the POEM2 conference (pp. 223–234). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 461–555). New York, NY: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. The Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3–17. doi: 10.2307/748969
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 96–105. doi: 10.2307/749665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2005). Child-initiated mathematical patterning in the pre-compulsory years. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 313–320). Melbourne: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Greenes, C., Ginsburg, H. P., & Balfanz, R. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. N., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 457–486). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mousoulides, N. G., & English, L. D. (2009). Kindergarten students’ understanding of probability concepts. In Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 137–144). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME).
   Google Scholar
• Nikiforidou, Z., & Pange, J. (2010). The notions of chance and probabilities in preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 305–311. doi: 10.1007/s10643-010-0417-x
   Google Scholar
• Papic, M., Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–269. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, L., Bardini, C., Sabena, C., Diallo, P., & Simbagoye, A. (2005). On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: A semiotic-cultural perspective on mathematical thinking. In Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 113–120). Australia: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., McLean, L. E., & McEldoon, K. L. (2013). Emerging understanding of patterning in 4-year-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(3), 376–396. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.689897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435–488). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2004). What is developmentally appropriate in early childhood mathematics education? Lessons from new research. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 91–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-) understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (1988). The science of patterns. Science, 240, 611–616. doi: 10.1126/science.240.4852.611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P. (2007). When intuition beats logic: prospective teachers' awareness of their same sides-same angles solutions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(3), 255–279. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9053-1
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Cohen, S. (1998). Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1257–1269. doi: 10.1080/0950069980201006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: The case of triangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81–95. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9133-5
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E. (2005). Patterns supporting the development of early algebraic thinking. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of australasia, melbourne. Building connections: Research, theory and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 759–766). Sydney: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379–402. doi: 10.1023/A:1020291317178
   Google Scholar