Investigating undergraduate students’ view of and consistency in choosing empirical and deductive arguments

References

• Bieda, K. N., & Lepak, J. (2014). Are you convinced? Middle-grade students’ evaluations of mathematical arguments. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), 166–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R., & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: Proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A. (2014). On skepticism and its role in the development of proof in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 311–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359–387.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (pp. 234–282). Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 805–842). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 396–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Inglis, M. (2010). Undergraduate students’ use of deductive arguments to solve ‘prove that … ’ tasks. Proceedings of the 7th congress of the European society for research in mathematics education.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 270–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 379–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 61–88.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Choppin, J. M., & Bieda, K. N. (2009). Middle school students’ production of mathematical justifications. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-l 6 perspective (pp. 153–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Choppin, J., Slaughter, M., & Sutherland, J. (2002). Mapping the conceptual terrain of middle school students’ competencies in justifying and proving. Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 1693–1670). Athens, GA: Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 249–266.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K. (2002). Mathematical reasoning: Adults’ ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 79–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recio, A. M., & Godino, J. D. (1996). Assessment of university students’ mathematical generalization and symbolization capacities. PME conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1–231). The Program Committee of the 18th PME Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Recio, A. M., & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, C. S., & Siegel, M. J. (2015). CUPM curriculum guide to majors in the mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (1987). Errors and misconceptions in college level theorem proving. Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 457–470). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowder, L., & Harel, G. (2003). Case studies of mathematics majors’ proof understanding, production, and appreciation. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Rotou, O. (2015). Undergraduate students’ understanding of proof: Relationships between proof conceptions, beliefs, and classroom experiences with learning proof. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 91–134.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 306–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2013). On the sophistication of naïve empirical reasoning: Factors influencing mathematicians’ persuasion ratings of empirical arguments. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). How mathematicians obtain conviction: Implications for mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 36–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Lew, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2019). Using expectancy value theory to account for students’ mathematical justifications. Cognition and Instruction. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1636796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2015). On relative and absolute conviction in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(2), 15–21.
   Google Scholar