Relations between semiotic resources in mathematics tasks: a source of students' difficulties

References

• Abedi, J., Leon, S., Wolf, M. K., & Farnsworth, T. (2008). Detecting test items differentially impacting the performance of ELL students. Providing validity evidence to improve the assessment of English language learners, 55–80: CRESST report 738.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acartürk, C., Taboada, M., & Habel, C. (2013). Cohesion in multimodal documents. Information Design Journal, 20(2), 98–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A comceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagni, G. (2006). Cognitive difficulties related to the representations of two major concepts of set theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, H. (2011). The role of lexical cohesion in L2 reading. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, M., & Joffrion, H. (2006). Algebraic equations: Can middle-school students meaningfully translate from words to mathematical symbols? Reading Psychology, 27(2–3), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chahine, I. (2011). The role of translations between and within representations on the conceptual understanding of fraction knowledge: A trans-cultural study. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O. S. P., Band, G., Pirinen, M., Haworth, C. M. A., Meaburn, E. L., Kovas, Y., … Spencer, C. C. A. (2014). The correlation between reading and mathematics ability at age twelve has a substantial genetic component. Nature Communications, 5, article no. 4204. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F. (2013). Using the Student’s t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Practical assessment. Research & Evaluation, 18(10), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Delice, A., & Sevimli, E. (2010). An investigation of the pre-services teachers’ ability of using multiple representations in problem-solving success: The case of definite integral. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(1), 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Désiron, J. C., Vries, E., Bartel, A. N., & Varahamurti, N. (2018). The influence of text cohesion and picture detail on young readers’ knowledge of science topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 465–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouhard, J.-P., & Teppo, A. R. (2004). Symbols and language. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 227–264). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A. (2016). The role of semiotic resources when reading and solving mathematics tasks. Nordisk matematikkdidaktikk [Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education], 21(3), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A. (2018). Conceptualising translations between representations. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 379–386). Umeå: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A., Bergqvist, E., & Österholm, M. (2015). Uncommon vocabulary in mathematical tasks in relation to demand of reading ability and solution frequency. Nordisk matematikkdidaktikk [Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education], 20(1), 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Mousoulides, M. (2006). Are registers of representations and problem solving processes on functions compartmentalized in students’ thinking? Revista Latinoamericana De Investigación En Matemática Educativa, 9(4), 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J. (2008). Longitudinal Associations between reading and mathematics Achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 410–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag, N., Roppelt, A., & Heppt, B. (2015). Effects of mathematics items’ language demands for language minority students: Do they differ between grades? Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (2012). Mathematics is differentially related to reading comprehension and word decoding: Evidence from a genetically sensitive design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 622–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1989). The texture of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective ( Chapter 4, pp. 52–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 65–97). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, K., Pepin, B., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Word problems versus image-rich problems: An analysis of effects of task characteristics on students’ performance on contextual mathematics problems. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihedioha, S. A. (2014). Students’ ability and achievement in recognizing multiple representations in algebra. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 2(1), 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The relation between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1013–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Wilson, M., & Cheng, C. (2013). An investigation of the nature of the influences of item stem and option representation on student responses to a mathematics test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1141–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, A., Escobar, J.-P., & Véliz, S. (2018). The effects of multimodal texts on science reading comprehension in Chilean fifth-graders: Text scaffolding and comprehension skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2226–2244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., & Sfard, A. (2016). Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: A discursive approach. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 92–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Tekster fra IMFUFA, Vol. 485. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). PISA released items – mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/38709418.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2015). The language of learning mathematics: A multimodal perspective. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40(Part A), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325–346.
   Google Scholar
• Panasuk, R. M. (2010). Three phase ranking framework for assessing conceptual understanding in algebra using multiple representations. Education, 131(2), 235–257.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., & Puig, L. (2007). Syntax and meaning as sensous, visual, historical forms of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(2), 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discource analysis. In T. D. Royce & W. L. Boucher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics ( Vol. 5 rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Teich, E., & Fankhauser, P. (2005). Exploring lexical patterns in text: Lexical cohesion analysis with WordNet. In S. Dipper, M. Götze, & M. Stede (Eds.), Heterogeneity in focus: Creating and using linguistic databases. Interdisciplinary studies on information Structure ( Vol. 2, pp. 129–145). Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R., Dossey, J., Blum, W., & Niss, M. (2009). Using mathematical competencies to predict item difficulty in PISA: A MEG study. In P. Manfred, K. Mareike, S. Katrin, & R. Silke (Eds.), Research on PISA. Research outcomes of the PISA research conference 2009 (pp. 23–37). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 496–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., & Leon, S. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3–4), 139–159.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., & Huang, F. (2004). Relationships among computational performance, pictorial representation, symbolic representation and number sense of sixth-grade students in Taiwan. Eucucational Studies, 30(4), 373–389.
   Google Scholar