Revisiting purpose and conceptualisation in the design of assessments of mathematics teachers’ knowledge

References

• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, L., Izsák, A., Templin, J., & Jacobson, E. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understanding of rational number: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(1), 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2016). Statewide mathematics professional development: Teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, 30(4), 539–572. doi:10.1177/0895904814550075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Gianopulos, G., McGowan, W., Shah, M., & Belcher, M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM, 49(5), 717–734. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0869-1
   Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Cohen, A., Templin, J., & Orrill, C. (2018). Usable measures of teacher understanding: Exploring diagnostic models and topic analysis as tools for assessing proportional reasoning for teaching. Grant funded by the National Science Foundation (Award No. DRL-1813760).
   Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching: A longitudinal study using two measures. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(3), 211–236. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9233-0
   Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Nye, B., Orrill, C., & Cohen, A. (2018). Advancing middle school teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning for teaching. Grant funded by the Institute of Educational Sciences. (Award No. R305A180392).
   Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Plowman, D., & Bai, H. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ learning: Identifying key learning opportunities linked to teachers’ knowledge growth. American Educational Research Journal. doi: 10.3102/0002831218820033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985, 2013). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. (2008). Technical report on 2007 proportional reasoning pilot Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) measures learning mathematics for teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy (IMAP) Research Team. (2003). IMAP web-based beliefs survey manual. Retrieved from http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/CRMSE/IMAP/Beliefs-Survey_Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., Orrill, C. H., Cohen, A., & Brown, R. E. (2010). Measuring middle grades teachers’ understanding of rational numbers with the mixture Rasch model. Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., & Templin, J. (2016). Coordinating descriptions of mathematical knowledge and psychometric models: Opportunities and challenges. In A. Izsák, J. Remillard, & J. Templin (Eds.), Psychometric methods in mathematics education: Opportunities, challenges, and interdisciplinary collaborations (pp. 5–30). Journal of Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series No. 15. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Thompson, B. J., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568–589. doi:10.3102/0002831212437853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kwak, M., Cardozo-Gaibisso, L. A., Buxton, C. A., & Cohen, A. S. (2017). Statistical and qualitative analyses of students’ answers to a constructed response test of science inquiry knowledge. Journal of Writing Analytics, 1(1), 82–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2007). Survey of teachers of mathematics: Form LMT PR-2007. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., & Ellis, A. B. (2010). Essential understandings: Ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning (R. M. Zbieck, Series Ed.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968, 2008). Statistical theories of mental test scores. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. (2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–57. Retrieved from http://ed-osprey.gsu.edu/ojs/index.php/JUME/article/viewFile/204/135
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orrill, C. H., & Cohen, A. (2016a). Purpose and conceptualization: Examining assessment development questions through analysis of measures of teacher knowledge. In A. Izsák, J. T. Remillard, & J. Templin (Eds.), Psychometric methods in mathematics education: Opportunities, challenges, and interdisciplinary collaborations (pp. 139–153). Journal of Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series No. 15. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Orrill, C. H., & Cohen, A. S. (2016b). Why defining the construct matters: An examination of teacher knowledge using different lenses on one assessment. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1 & 2), 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2011). The structure of prospective kindergarten teachers’ proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. (2013). The knowledge quartet: The genesis and application of a framework for analysing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Journal of Education, 1(3), 15–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Scher, L., & O’Reilly, F. (2009). Professional development for K-12 math and science teachers: What do we really know? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(3), 209–249. doi:10.1080/19345740802641527
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, C., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Izsák, A., Orrill, C. H., de la Torre, J., … Khasanova, E. (2016). Developing workable attrtibutes for psychometric models based on the Q-matrix. In A. Izsák, J. Remillard, & J. Templin (Eds.), Psychometric methods in mathematics education: Opportunities, challenges, and interdisciplinary collaborations (pp. 73–96). Journal of Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series No. 15. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of diagnostic classification model examinee estimates. Journal of Classification, 30, 251–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Brown, R. E., & Nagar, G. G. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ ability to identify situations appropriate for proportional reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2019.1579668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R. E., & Burke, J. (2020). A framework for a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar