References
- Brandom, R. B. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Canada, D., & Goering, D. (2008). Deep thoughts on the river crossing game. Mathematics Teacher, 101(9), 632–639.
- Erickson, T., Wilkerson, M., Finzer, W., & Reichsman, F. (2019). Data moves. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 12(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0mg8m7g6
- Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195–227.
- Kadijevich, D. M., & Madden, S. R. (2015). Comparing approaches for developing TPCK. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), New directions in technological and pedagogical content knowledge research (pp. 125–146). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Kazak, S., & Pratt, D. (2021). Developing the role of modelling in the teaching and learning of probability. Research in Mathematics Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1802328
- Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding Distributions by Modeling Them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 217–230.
- Konold, C., & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2(1), 1–37.
- Konold, C., Madden, S., Pollatsek, A., Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C., Ziedins, I., … Kazak, S. (2011). Conceptual challenges in coordinating theoretical and data-centered estimates of probability. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 68–86.
- Lane-Getaz, S. J. (2006). What is statistical thinking and how is it developed? In G. F. Burrill & P. C. Elliott (Eds.), Sixty-eighth yearbook: Thinking and reasoning with data and chance (Vol. 68, pp. 273–290). Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Langrall, C., Makar, K., Nilsson, P., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2017). Teaching and learning probability and statistics: An integrated perspective. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 267–291). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
- Madden, S. (2018). Impacting mathematical and technological creativity with dynamic technology scaffolding. In V. Freiman & J. Tassell (Eds.), Creativity and technology in mathematics education, (pp. 89–124). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Madden, S. (2019). Exploring secondary teacher statistical learning in a blended format statistics and modeling course. In G. Burrill & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), The teaching and learning of statistics: International perspectives (Vol. II, pp. 265–282). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Nilsson, P. (2020). Students’ informal hypothesis testing in a probability context with concrete random generators. Statistics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 53–73.
- Noll, J., & Kirin, D. (2016). Student approaches to constructing statistical models using TinkerPlots TM. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 9(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/05b643r9
- Pea, R. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.
- Wing, Jeannette. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
- Woodard, V., & Lee, H. (2021). How students use statistical computing in problem solving. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(sup1), S145–S156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1847007