285
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Narratives of success: enabling all students to excel in the global world

ORCID Icon
Pages 293-305 | Received 13 Nov 2020, Accepted 13 Oct 2021, Published online: 24 Dec 2021

References

  • Andrade-Molina, M. (2017a). Be the best version of yourself! OECD’s promises of welfare through school mathematics. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international mathematics education and society conference (pp. 393–400). Volos: University of Thessaly Press.
  • Andrade-Molina, M. (2017b). The adventure of the deceitful numbers. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(2), 9–25.
  • Andrade-Molina, M. (Forthcoming). Following the white rabbit: The science behind educational policies and reforms. In G. Fan & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), International handbook on educational policy studies. Springer International Publishing.
  • Balestra, C., & Fleisher, L. (2018). Diversity statistics in the OECD: How do OECD countries collect data in ethnic, racial and indigenous identity? Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Coulson, A. (2008). Markets vs. monopolies in education. A global review of the evidence. Policy Analysis, 620, 1–4.
  • de Freitas, E., & Walshaw, M. (2016). Alternative theoretical framework for mathematics education research. Cham: Springer.
  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Diaz, J. D. (2013). Governing equality: Mathematics for all? European Education, 45(3), 35–50.
  • Diaz, J. D. (2017). A cultural history of reforming math for all: The paradox of making in/equality. New York: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hultqvist, E. (2018). Educational restructuring and social boundaries: School choice and consumers. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance (pp. 77–91). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Hultqvist, E., Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. (2018). Critical analyses of educational reform-writing a title and ending a book. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Krejsler, J. B., Olsson, U., & Petersson, K. (2018). Becoming fit for tansnational comparability. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance (pp. 93–111). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Lingard, B. (2018). Reforming education: The spaces and places of education policy and learning. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance (pp. 63–76). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Lubienski, S., & Gutiérrez, R. (2008). Bridging the gaps in perspectives on equity in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 365–371.
  • Mendick, H., & Llewellyn, A. (2011). Does every child count?: Quality, equity and mathematics with/in with neoliberalism. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 49–62). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • OECD. (2010). Pathways to success. How knowledge and skills at age 15 shape future lives in Canada. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2011a). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/2220363x
  • OECD. (2011b). Against the odds: Disadvantaged students who succeed in school. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264090873-en
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity (volume II): giving every student the chance to succeed. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
  • OECD. (2015). Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicator. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en
  • OECD. (2016a). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250246-en
  • OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
  • OECD. (2017a). PISA 2015 results (volume V): Collaborative problem solving, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en
  • OECD. (2017b). PISA 2015 results (volume IV): Students’ financial literacy, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270282-en
  • OECD. (2018a). Social and emotional skills for student success and well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
  • OECD. (2018b). The resilience of students with an immigrant background: Factors that shape well-being. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292093-en
  • OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results (volume V): Effective policies, successful schools, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en
  • Pais, A. (2015). Symbolising the real of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 375–391.
  • Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2011). Beyond disavowing the politics of equity and quality in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 35–48). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Pettersson, D., Popkewitz, T., & Lindblad, S. (2016). On the use of educational numbers: Comparative constructions of hierarchies by means of large-scale assessments. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 3(1), 177–202.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Education sciences, schooling, and abjection: Recognizing difference and the making of inequality? South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 301–319.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2018). Reform and making human kinds: The double gestures of inclusion and exclusion in the practice of schooling. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance (pp. 133–150). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. In S. Binkley & J. Capetillo-Ponce (Eds.), A Foucault for the 21st century: Governmentality, biopolitics and discipline in the new millennium (pp. 2–15). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692.
  • Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0082. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082
  • Tröhler, D., Meyer, H. D., Labaree, D. F., & Hutt, E. L. (2014). Accountability: Antecedents, power, and processes. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–2.
  • Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics for all, economic growth, and the making of the citizenworker. In T. S. Popkewitz, J. Diaz, & C. Kirchgasler (Eds.), A political sociology of educational knowledge: Studies of exclusions and difference (pp. 117–132). New York: Routledge.
  • Vavrus, F. (2017). From gap to debt: Rethinking equity metaphors in education. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 16(3), 5–16.
  • Wilkins, A. (2012). Pedagogy of the consumer: The politics of neo-liberal welfare reform. Journal of Pedagogy, 3(2), 161–173.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.