Supporting primary students’ mathematical reasoning practice: the effects of formative feedback and the mediating role of self-efficacy

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. (2019). Perseverance in mathematical reasoning: The role of children’s conative focus in the productive interplay between cognition and affect. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 271–294. doi:10.1080/14794802.2019.1590229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.-L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 416–428. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezold, A. (2009). Förderung von Argumentationskompetenzen durch selbstdifferenzierende Lernangebote. Eine Studie im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule. Kovac.
   Google Scholar
• Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, W., & Kirsch, A. (1991). Preformal proving: Examples and reflections. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(2), 183–203. doi:10.2307/3482408
   Google Scholar
• Boivard, J. A., & Koziol, N. A. (2012). Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 495–511). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, L. A., Herbert, S., Loong, E. Y.-K., Vale, C., & Widjaja, W. (2016). Primary teachers notice the impact of language on children’s mathematical reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 523–544. doi:10.1007/s13394-016-0178-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., Harris, L. R., & Harnett, J. (2012). Teacher beliefs about feedback within an assessment for learning environment: Endorsement of improved learning over student well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 968–978. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, E., Jullier, R., & Lampart, J. (2019). Aufgabenangebot zum mathematischen Begründen in je zwei aktuellen Mathematikbüchern für die fünfte bzw. achte Klasse. Swiss Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 647–664.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. Y., & Lam, S.-F. (2010). Effects of different evaluative feedback on students’ self-efficacy in learning. Instructional Science, 38(1), 37–58. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9077-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Identifying kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405–438. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Op't Eynde, P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 687–726). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of study https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Arts, J., & van Diggelen, M. (2019). In-text and rubric-referenced feedback: Differences in focus, level, and function. Active Learning in Higher Education, 0(0), 1469787419855208. doi:10.1177/1469787419855208
   Google Scholar
• Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2011). Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 349–367). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., Björklund Boistrup, L., & Thornberg, R. (2017). A categorisation of teacher feedback in the classroom: A field study on feedback based on routine classroom assessment in primary school. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 316–332. doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1225787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729–740. doi:10.1037/a0018863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, T., Jones, K., & Miyazaki, M. (2018). Learners’ use of domain-specific computer-based feedback to overcome logical circularity in deductive proving in geometry. ZDM, 50(4), 699–713. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0950-4
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., & Brown, S. A. (2018). Feedback influences children's reasoning about math equivalence: A meta-analytic review. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(2), 157–178. doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1359208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1094–1108. doi:10.1037/a0028389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics education: Children's minds, teachers’ minds. Human Development, 52, 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, G. (2014). Mathematical proof, argumentation, and reasoning. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 404–408). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_102
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.787922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E., McCallum, B., & Gipps, C. (2000). Teacher feedback strategies in primary classrooms - new evidence. In A. Susan (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 21–31). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning feedback. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 263–285). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, S., Bruckmaier, G., Binder, K., Krauss, S., & Bühner, M. (2019). Prediction of elementary mathematics grades by cognitive abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 665–683. doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0394-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2018). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, F.-J., Horng, W.-S., & Shy, H.-Y. (2011). From exploration to proof production. In G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 279–303). Cham, CH: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. B. (2010). Formative assessment practices that maximize learning for students at risk. In H. Andrade, & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 212–232). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 23–31. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9944440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempert, S., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2011). Cognitive benefits and costs of bilingualism in elementary school students: The case of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, J., Lara-Meloy, T., Stevens Stallworth, H., & Wise Rutstein, D. (2014). Advice for mathematical argumentation. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(8), 494–500. doi:10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.8.0494
   Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D., & Liu, H. (2020). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self-efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi-level analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 101–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in task solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3483188
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Wilson, M., & Paek, I. (2008). A multidimensional rasch analysis of gender differences in PISA mathematics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(1), 18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubienski, S. T., Robinson, J. P., Crane, C. C., & Ganley, C. M. (2013). Girls’ and boys’ mathematics achievement, affect, and experiences: Findings from ECLS-K. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 634–645. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüken, M. M., Peter-Koop, A., & Kollhoff, S. (2014). Influence of Early Repeating Patterning Ability on School Mathematics Learning. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Guyot, L. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ noticing of essential mathematical reasoning forms: Justification and generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 35–67. doi:10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (2010). Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction. https://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices; Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(5), 158–175.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, T., Davies, P., & Brady, J. (2020). Using video clubs to develop teachers’ thinking and practice in oral feedback and dialogic teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–23. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1752619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Barnes, M. A. (2020). The role of pre-algebraic reasoning within a word-problem intervention for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. ZDM, 52(1), 151–163. doi:10.1007/s11858-019-01093-1
   Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback's perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 154–165. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, 1118–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Rothermel Rawding, M., & Wills, T. (2012). Discourse: Simple moves that work. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(1), 46–51. doi:10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.1.0046
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Min, L. (2013). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 215–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781452218649
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2012). Problematizing the didactic triangle. ZDM, 44(5), 587–599.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). Summative and formative assessments in mathematics supporting the goals of the common core standards. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 183–194. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1044346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-Efficacy and Education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-Efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281–303). Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, B., Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Besser, M., & Leiss, D. (2017). Training effects on teachers’ feedback practice: The mediating function of feedback knowledge and the moderating role of self-efficacy [journal article]. ZDM, 49(3), 475–489. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0855-7
   Google Scholar
• Semadeni, Z. (1984). Action proofs in primary mathematics teaching and in teacher training. For the Learning of Mathematics, 4(1), 32–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40247842
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 13–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3483239
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, R. (2009). Die formative Beurteilung und ihr Nutzen für die Entwicklung von Lernkompetenz. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., Birri, T., & Hess, K. (2017). Effects of a rubric for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school. Instructional Science, 45(5), 603–622. doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9416-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, R., & Birri, T. (2014). Assuring the quality of standards-oriented classroom assessment with rubrics for complex competencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43(December), 5–13. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R., Hess, K., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., & Birri, T. (2019). What happens after the intervention? Results from teacher professional development in employing mathematical reasoning tasks and a supporting rubric. Frontiers in Education, 3, doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00113
   Google Scholar
• Stanat, P., & Christensen, G. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J. (2008). An analytic framework of reasoning-and-proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Textbook analyses on reasoning-and-proving: Significance and methodological challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 64(0), 63–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (2014). Does cognitive strategy training on word problems compensate for working memory capacity in children with math difficulties? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 831–848. doi:10.1037/a0035838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss Conference of Cantonal Ministers of Education (EDK). (2011a). Basic competences in mathematics. National standards. Retrieved 23.10.13, from http://edudoc.ch/record/96784/files/grundkomp_math_d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Conference of Cantonal Ministers of Education (EDK). (2011b). National standards for compulsory education: basic competences for four subjects. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from https://www.edk.ch/dyn/12930.php
   Google Scholar
• Tait-McCutcheon, S. (2008). Self-efficacy in mathematics: Affective, cognitive, and conative domains of functioning. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education group of australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2003). Self-Efficacy in mathematics and students’ Use of self-regulated learning strategies during assessment events. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. L. (2014). Creating an assessment-centered classroom: Five essential assessment strategies to support middle grades student learning and achievement. Middle School Journal, 45(5), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., & Turner, J. C. (2007). Competence motivation in the classroom. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 297–317). New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., & Depaoli, S. (2014). Bayesian analyses: Where to start and what to report. The European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• van der Scheer, E. A., Bijlsma, H. J. E., & Glas, C. A. W. (2019). Validity and reliability of student perceptions of teaching quality in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 30–50. doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1539015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
   Google Scholar
• Viholainen, A. (2011). The view of mathematics and argumentation. Proceedings of the 7th congress of the European society for research in mathematics education, 9th-13th February, University of Rzeszów, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful. IERI Monograph Series, 2, 9–36.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, D. C. (2004). Discourse based assessment in the mathematics classroom: A study of teachers’ instructionally embedded assessment practices. In T. A. Romberg (Ed.), Standards-based mathematics assessment in middle school (pp. 169–187). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitenack, J., & Yackel, E. (2002). Making mathematical arguments in the primary grades: The importance of explaining and justifying ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(9), 524–528.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbers, K. A., Dostal, H. M., Skerrit, P., & Stephenson, B. (2017). The impact of three years of professional development on knowledge and implementation. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 61–71. doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1039112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyndhamn, J., & Säljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning—A study of children's mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 361–382. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar