Affective content knowledge as foundation for critical mathematics pedagogy

References

• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battey, D. (2013). “Good” mathematics teaching for students of color and those in poverty: The importance of relational interactions within instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9412-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battey, D., & Leyva, L. (2013). Rethinking mathematics instruction: An analysis of relational interactions and mathematics achievement in elementary classrooms. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. PME-NA 35, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Battey, D., & Leyva, L. (2015). Building a case for understanding relational dimensions in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference. Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (MES8), Portland, OR, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, A. (2018). Humanizing and dehumanizing trends in a critical math classroom. In U. Gellert, C. Knipping, & H. Straehler-Pohl (Eds.), Inside the mathematics class (pp. 247–268). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• CASEL. (2019). Advancing social and emotional learning. https://casel.org/core-competencies/
   Google Scholar
• Emdin, C. (2021). Ratchetdemic: Reimagining academic success. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartland, S. (2019). The balancing act: Meeting the social-emotional needs of students and accomplishing learning goals. In S. Otten, A. G. Candela, Z. de Araujo, C. Haines, & C. Munter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1761–1762). St Louis, MO: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Gartland, S. (2020). Supporting the whole student: Blending the mathematical and the social-emotional. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Mathematics education across cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Mexico (pp. 541–545). Cinvestav / AMIUTEM / PME-NA.
   Google Scholar
• Ginwright, S. (2021). The four pivots: Reimagining justice, reimagining ourselves. North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 17–33). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Mathematical caring relations in action. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(3), 236–273. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.3.0236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R., Hunter, J., Anthony, G., & McChesney, K. (2018). Developing mathematical inquiry communities: Enacting culturally responsive, culturally sustaining, ambitious mathematics teaching. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 2(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0106
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A. (2020). Rough draft math: Revising to learn. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A., Cooper, B., Vascellaro, S., & Wandless, P. (2017). Rough-draft talk in mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 22(5), 304–307. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.22.5.0304
   Google Scholar
• Kalinec-Craig, C. A. (2017). The rights of the learner: A framework for promoting equity through formative assessment in mathematics education. Democracy & Education, 25(2), Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Kokka, K. (2022). Toward a theory of affective pedagogical goals for social justice mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Rolón-Dow, R. (2005). Critical care: A color (full) analysis of care narratives in the schooling experiences of Puerto Rican girls. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubel, L. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 66–105. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a324
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, D. W., & Wager, A. A. (2012). A sojourn into the empowering uncertainties of teaching and learning mathematics for social change. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators (pp. 3–18). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 359–386.
   Google Scholar