Soil disturbance caused by different skidding methods in mountainous forests of Northern Iran

References

• Ansorge D, Godwin RJ. 2007. The effect of tyres and a rubber track at high axle loads on soil compaction, Part 1: single axle-studies. Biosyst Eng. 98:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust WM, Burger JA, Carter EA, Preston DP, Patterson SC. 1998. Visually determined soil disturbance classes used as indices of forest harvesting disturbance. South J Appl For. 22:245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bolding MC, Kellogg LD, Davis CT. 2009. Soil compaction and visual disturbance following an integrated mechanical forest fuel reduction operation in southwest Oregon. Int J For Eng. 20:47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Botta GF, Becerra AT, Tourn FB. 2009. Effect of the number of tractor passes on soil rut depth and compaction in two tillage regimes. Soil Till Res. 103:381–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botta GF, Jorajuria D, Rosatto H, Ferrero C. 2006. Light tractor traffic frequency on soil compaction in the Rolling Pampa region of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 86:9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brais S. 2001. Persistence of soil compaction and effects on seedling growth in northwestern Quebec. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 65:1263–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton J. 1997. Logging trucks, tractors and crawlers. Osceola (WI): Motorbooks International; 128 p.
   Google Scholar
• Davies D, Finney J, Richardson S. 1973. Relative effects of tractor weight and wheel-slip in causing soil compaction. J Soil Sci. 24:399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deconchat M. 2001. Effets des techniques d’exploitation forestière sur l’ètat de surface du sol. Ann For Sci. 58:653–661.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson L. 2005. Effects of forwarder tyre pressure on rut formation and soil compaction. Silva Fenn. 39:549–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson L, Wästerlund I. 2007. Effects of slash reinforcement of strip roads on rutting and soil compaction on a moist fine-grained soil. For Ecol Manage. 252:118–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzati S, Najafi A, Rab MA, Zenner EK. 2012. Recovery of soil bulk density, porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran. Silva Fenn. 46:521–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández RA, Mac Donagh PM, Lupi AM, Rodolfo M, Pablo C. 2002. Relations between soil compaction and plantation growth of a 8 years old Lobolly pine second rotation, in Misiones, Argentine. Presentation at the 2002 ASAE annual international meeting/CIGR XVth world congress sponsored by ASAE and CIGR Hyatt Regency Chicago; Chicago (IL). Paper Number: 025012.
   Google Scholar
• Freeze RA, Cherry JA. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 604 p.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich HA, McNabb DH. 1984. Minimizing soil compaction in Pacific Northwest forests. In forest soils and treatment impacts. In: Stone EL, editor. Proceedings of the 6th North American Forest Soils Conference. Knoxville (TN): Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee; p. 159–192.
   Google Scholar
• Gayoso J, Iroumé A. 1991. Compaction and soil disturbances from logging in southern Chile. Ann Sci For. 48:63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondard H, Romane F, Aronson J, Shater Z. 2003. Impact of soil surface disturbances on functional group diversity after clear-cutting in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) forests in southern France. For Ecol Manage. 180:165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greacen EL, Sands R. 1980. Compaction of forest soils. A review. Aust J Soil Res. 18:163–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey B, Brais S. 2002. Effects of mechanized careful logging on natural regeneration and vegetation competition in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest. Can J For Res. 32:653–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heninger R, Scott W, Dobkowski A, Miller R, Anderson H, Duke S. 2002. Soil disturbance and 10-year growth response of coast Douglas-fir on non tilled and tilled skid trails in the Oregon Cascades. Can J For Res. 32:233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn R, Vossbrink J, Becker S. 2004. Modern forestry vehicles and their impacts on soil physical properties. Soil Till Res. 79:207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lacey ST, Ryan PJ. 1996. Impact of forest harvesting on the hydraulic properties of surface soil. Soil Sci. 161:79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidi R, Jaeger D, Raafatnia N, Tabari M. 2008. Influence of two ground-based skidding systems on soil compaction in different slope conditions. Int J For Eng. 19:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jim CY. 1993. Soil compaction as a constraint to tree growth in tropical & subtropical urban habitats. Env Cons. 20:35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra YP, Maynard DG. 1991. Methods and manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Forestry Canada, Re NOR-X-319. Northern Forestry Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski TT. 1999. Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scand J For Res. 14:596–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg JD, Miller RE, Anderson HW, Tepp JS. 2003. Bulk density and soil resistance to penetration as affected by commercial thinning in Northeastern Washington. United States Department of Agriculture. Pacific Northwest Research Station. PNW-RP-551.
   Google Scholar
• Marchi E, Picchio R, Spinelli R, Verani S, Venanzi R, Certini G. 2014. Environmental impact assessment of different logging methods in pine forests thinning. Ecol Eng. 70:429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy D, Stewart B, Neily P, Quigley E, Keys K. 2004. Post-harvest soil disturbance and permanent structure survey. Ecosystem Management Group Forest Management Planning. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources; 17 p.
   Google Scholar
• McIver JD. 2004. Sediment transport and soil disturbance after post fire logging. Hydro Sci Tech. 20:101–112.
   Google Scholar
• McIver JD, Starr L. 2001. A literature review on the environmental effects of postfire logging. West J Appl For. 16:159–168.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon S. 1995. Accuracy of two ground survey methods for assessing site disturbance. J For Eng. 6:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RE, Scott W, Hazard JW. 1996. Soil compaction and conifer growth after tractor yarding at three coastal Washington locations. Can J For Res. 26:225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy G. 1984. A survey of soil disturbance caused by harvesting machinery in New Zealand plantation forests. N Z For Res Inst (FRI) Bull. 69:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Naghdi R, Bagheri I, Basiri R. 2010. Soil disturbances due to machinery traffic on steep skid trail in the north mountainous forest of Iran. J For Res. 21:497–502.
   Google Scholar
• Naghdi R, Bagheri I, Lotfalian M, Setodeh B. 2009a. Rutting and soil displacement caused by 450C Timber Jack wheeled skidder (Asalem forest northern Iran). J For Sci. 55:177–183.
   Google Scholar
• Naghdi R, Lotfalian M, Moradmand Jalali A, Bagheri I. 2009b. Damages of skidder and animal logging to forest soils and natural regeneration. Cro J For Eng. 30:141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghdi R, Solgi A. 2014. Effects of skidder passes and slope on soil disturbance in two soil water contents. Cro J For Eng. 35:73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi A, Sobhani H, Saeed A, Makhdom M, Mohajer MM. 2008. Planning and assessment of alternative forest road and skidding networks. Cro J For Eng. 29:63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi A, Solgi A. 2010. Assessing site disturbance using two ground survey methods in a mountain forest. Cro J For Eng. 31:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi A, Solgi A, Sadeghi SH. 2009. Soil disturbance following four wheel rubber skidder logging on the steep trail in the north mountainous forest of Iran. Soil Till Res. 103:165–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent C, Kanali C, Owende PMO, Nieuwenhuis M, Ward S. 2003. Characteristic site disturbance due to harvesting and extraction machinery traffic onsensitive forest sites with peat soils. For Ecol Manage. 180:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picchio R, Neri F, Petrini E, Verani S, Marchi E, Certini G. 2012. Machinery-induced soil compaction in thinning two pine stands in central Italy. For Ecol Manage. 285:38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesnel HJ, Curran MP. 2000. Shelterwood harvesting in root-disease infected stands - post-harvest soil disturbance and compaction. For Ecol Manage. 133:89–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rab MA. 2004. Recovery of soil physical properties from compaction and soil profile disturbance caused by logging of native forest in Victorian central highlands, Australia. For Ecol Manage. 191:329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rab MA, Bradshaw J, Campbell R, Murphy S. 2005. Review of factors affecting disturbance, compaction and traffic ability of soils with particular reference to timber harvesting in the forests of South-West Western Australia. Department of Conservation and Land Management SFM Technical Report 2. 160 p.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger TW, Simmons GL, Pope PE. 1988. The impact of timber harvesting on soil properties and seedling growth in the South. South J Appl For. 12:58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rohand K, Al Kalb A, Herbauts J, Verbrugge JC. 2004. Changes in some mechanical properties of a loamy soil under the influence of mechanized forest exploitation in a beech forest of central Belgium. J Terr. 40:235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäffer J, Hartmann R, Wilpert KV. 2001. Effects of timber harvesting with tracked harvesters on physical soil properties In: Johansson J, editor. Proceedings from the third (final) meeting of a Concerted Action: Excavators and backhoe loaders as base machines in forest operations; Pisa (Italy). Uppsala: SLU; p. 119–124 (Research Note No. 11).
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan GJ. 2003. A comparison of rubber-tyred and steel-tracked skidders on forest soil physical properties. Aus J Soil Res. 41:1063–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha SP, Lanford BL, Rummer R, Dubois M. 2008. Soil disturbances from horse/mule logging operations coupled with machines in the southern United States. Int J For Eng. 19:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Solgi A, Naghdi R, Nikooy M. 2015a. Effects of skidder on soil compaction, forest floor removal and rut formation. Madera y Bosques. 21:145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solgi A, Naghdi R, Tsioras PA, Nikooy M. 2015b. Soil compaction and porosity changes caused during the operation of Timberjack450C skidder in northern Iran. Cro J For Eng. 36:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solgi A, Najafi A. 2014. The impacts of ground-based logging equipment on forest soil. J For Sci. 60:28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Solgi A, Najafi A, Sadeghi SH. 2014. Effects of traffic frequency and skid trail slope on surface runoff and sediment yield. Int J For Eng. 25:171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Solgi A, Najafi A, Sam Daliri H. 2013. Assessment of crawler tractor effects on soil surface properties. Cas J Env Sci. 11:185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Startsev AD, McNabb DH. 2000. Effects of skidding on forest soil infiltration in west-central Alberta. Can J Soil Sci. 80:617–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey J. 1949. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 5:99–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor C, Cartwright A. 1993. Benefits of low pressure tyres in agriculture. World Agric. 2:151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Visser R. 1997. Soil disturbances surveys of forestry operations: trial of the new EU protocol method. Management practices for forest harvesting considering environmental and economic constraints. Saint Jean d’Arvey (Chambe´ry), Savoie, France. Centre Technique du Bois et de l’Ameublement, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson JR, Neilsen WA. 2000. The influence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction and profile disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting. Can J For Res. 30:1196–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenner EK, Fauskee JT, Berger AL, Puettmann KJ. 2007. Impacts of skidding traffic intensity on soil disturbance, soil recovery, and aspen regeneration in north central Minnesota. North J Appl For. 24:177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar