Human, technology, organization and environment – a human factors perspective on performance in forest harvesting

References

• Ager B. 2014. Forestry labors’ humanization and rationalization from 1900 onwards [ Doctoral thesis/Luleå University of Technology]. [In Swedish with English abstract]. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Alam M, Walsh D, Strandgard M, Brown M. 2014. A log-by-log productivity analysis of two Valmet 475EX harvesters. Int J For Eng. 25:14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Albizu-Urionabarrenetxea P, Tolosana-Esteban E, Roman-Jordan E. 2013. Safety and health in forest harvesting operations. Diagnosis and preventive actions. Review for Syst. 22:392–400.
   Google Scholar
• Amalberti R, Deblon F. 1992. Cognitive modeling of fighter aircraft process-control - a step towards an intelligent on-board assistance system. Int J Man Mach Stud. 36:639–671.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson L, Bergström L, Krantz A, Lennerheim G, Pettersson B. 1968. Selection of tractor operators by means of psychological tests. Stockholm, Sweden: Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten. (Redogörelse; no. 7). [In Swedish with English abstract and figures].
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen A, Harstela P. 1993. Influence of small control levers of grapple loader on muscle strain, productivity and control errors. Int J For Eng. 5:23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Åteg M, Hedlund A, Pontén B. 2004. Attraktiv arbete: från anställdas uttalanden till skapandet av en modell. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet. (Arbetsliv i omvandling; no. 1). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Attebrant M, Winkel J, Mathiassen S, Kjellberg A. 1997. Shoulder-arm muscle load and performance during control operation in forestry machines: Effects of changing to a new arm rest, lever and boom control system. Appl Ergon. 28:85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audy J-F, Moreira MP, Westlund K, D’Amours S, LeBel L, Rönnqvist M 2012. Alternative logistics concepts fitting different wood supply situations and markets. CIRRELT. (CIRRELT no. 2012-24).
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson S-Å. 1998. The mechanization of logging operations in Sweden and its effect on occupational safety and health. Int J For Eng. 9:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson S-Å, Pontén B. 1990. New ergonomic problems in mechanized logging operations. Int J Ind Ergon. 5:267–273.
   Google Scholar
• Baes J. 2008. Vibration dampening on Forwarders. Uppsala: Skogforsk, the Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. (Arbetsrapport; no. 667). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge L. 1983. Ironies of automation. Automatica. 19:775–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SA, Dale Greene W. 2008. Changes in Georgia’s logging workforce, 1987-2007. South J Appl For. 32:60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Beamon BM. 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. Int J Operations Production Manag. 19:275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beevis D, Slade IM. 2003. Ergonomics—costs and benefits. Appl Ergon. 34:413–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist I, Nordén B, Lundström H. 2006. Besten med två virkeskurirer – studier av prestation och bränsleförbrukning [The Beast with two shuttles – studies of performance and fuel consumption]. Uppsala: Skogforsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 616). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Bergquist E 2009. Why do machine operators leave the forest industry? [ Master’s thesis/Swedish university of agricultural sciences]. (In Swedish with English summary) Umeå: Swedish university of agricultural sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bernasconi A, Schroff U. 2011. Professions and training in forestry. Results of an inquiry in Europe and northern America. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment. Available from: www.umwelt-schweiz.ch/ud-1052-e
   Google Scholar
• Bigot M, Cuchet E, Le Net E, Moskalik T, Nowacka W, Paschalis P, Zastocki D. 2005. ErgoWood - Implementation and socio-economic impact of mechanisation in France and Poland - Synthesis. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Uppsats; no. 3).
   Google Scholar
• Björheden R. 2001. Learning curves in tree section hauling in central Sweden. J For Eng. 12:9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlin F, Hultåker O. 2006. Controlling the costs of work related illness in forestry. What can the contractor do? For Stud Metsanduslikud Uurimused. 45:37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Boileau P-E, Rakheja S. 1990. Vibration attenuation performance of suspension seats for off-road forestry vehicles. Int J Ind Ergon. 5:275–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrand L. 1984. Production techniques and work environment - A study on forest machine operator’s work condition 1969-81. Garpenberg: The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Rapport; no. 159). [In Swedish with English summary].
   Google Scholar
• Brander M, Eriksson D. 2004. Delautomatisering av kranfunktioner på engreppsskördare [Semi-automation of boom functions on single-grip harvesters]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, SkogForsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 562). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Burström L, Nilsson T, Wahlström J. 2015. Whole-body vibration and the risk of low back pain and sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 88:403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burström L, Nordfjell T, Wästerlund I, Tabell L. 2006. Attempts to standardise vibration measurements in a single-grip harvester. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Act Control. 25:11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretta TR. 2000. US Air Force pilot selection and training methods. Aviat Space Environ Med. 71:950–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cation S, Jack R, Oliver M, Dickey JP, Lee-Shee NK. 2008. Six degree of freedom whole-body vibration during forestry skidder operations. Int J Ind Ergon. 38:739–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway G, Szalma J, Saxton B, Ross J, Hancock P. 2006. The effects of whole-body vibration on human performance: A meta-analytic examination. In: Proceedings of human factors and ergonomics society 50th annual meeting. San Francisco: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; p. 1741–1745.
   Google Scholar
• Egan A, Taggart D. 2004. Who will log in Maine’s north woods? A cross-cultural study of occupational choice and prestige. North J Appl For. 21:200–208.
   Google Scholar
• Eger T, Godwin AA, Henry DJ, Grenier SG, Callaghan J, Demerchant A. 2010. Biomechanics and evaluating the workplace. Why vehicle design matters: exploring the link between line-of-sight, driving posture and risk factors for injury. Work. 35:27–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Englund M 2009. Röststyrning av aggregatet på en engreppsskördare: En Wizard of Oz-studie [ Master thesis/Linköping University]. Linköping: Linköpings University. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Englund M, Adolfsson N, Mörk A, Jönsson P. 2015. Distributed work lighting – LED lamps improve lighting on forest and agricultural machines. Uppsala: Skogforsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 864). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson G. 1995. RSI in forest machine operators in Scandinavia. Uppsala, Sweden: Skogforsk, J Fryk. (Redogörelse; no. 4). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, LeBel L, Lindroos O. 2015. Management of outsourced forest harvesting operations for better customer-contractor alignment. For Policy Econ. 53:45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Lindroos O. 2014. Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets. Int J For Eng. 25:179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Flisberg P, Forsberg M, Rönnqvist M. 2007. Optimization based planning tools for routing of forwarders at harvest areas. Can J For Res. 37:2153–2163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg A-K 2002. Presentation i realtid av apteringsinformation i skördare - ett gränssnittsförslag [ Bachelor’s thesis/Högskolan i Gävle]. Gävle: Högskolan i Gävle. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Gallis C. 2013. Increasing productivity and controlling of work fatigue in forest operations by using prescribed active pauses: a selective review. Croat J For Eng. 34:103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardell B. 1976. Technology, alienation and mental health. Summary of a social psychological study of technology and the worker. Acta Sociol. 19:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Garland JJ. 1990. Assessing gains from woodsworker training. Int J Ind Ergon. 5:227–242.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S. 1993. Thinning with a forestry machine - the mental and physical work. Uppsatser & Resultat. 244. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S. 1997. Mechanised cleaning of young forest - The strain on the operator. Int J Ind Ergon. 20:137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S. 1998. A self-leveling and swiveling forestry machine cab. J For Eng. 9:7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S. 2002. Operation of the single-grip harvester: motor-sensory and cognitive work. Int J For Eng. 13:35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S, Dahlin B. 1999. Cut-to-length: the next decade. Int J For Eng. 10:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S, Lidén E, Bohlin F, editors. 2005. Health and performance in mechanised forest operations. 2nd ed. Internet: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Available from www2.spm.slu.se/ergowood.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S, Söderqvist A, Ager B. 1999. Arbete och organisation i trädbränslesystem. Uppsala: Institutionen för skogshushållning, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. (Rapport; no.1). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Gerasimov Y, Sokolov A. 2009. Ergonomic characterization of harvesting work in Karelia. Croat J For Eng. 30:159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevsten S, Sjögren B. 1996. Symptoms and sick leave among forestry machine operators working with pronated hands. Appl Ergon. 27:277–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg J, Lidén E. 1991. Minispakar minskar belastningsbesvär [Mini-controls decrease musculo-skeletal symptoms]. Kista: Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbetaren. (Resultat; no. 24). (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Hagen KB, Magnus PER, Vetlesen K. 1998. Neck/shoulder and low-back disorders in the forestry industry: relationship to work tasks and perceived psychosocial job stress. Ergonomics. 41:1510–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström C, Englund M, Lindroos O. 2015. Examining the gaze behaviors of harvester operators: an eye-tracking study. Int J For Eng. 26:96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström C, Kawasaki A, Lidestav G. 2013. Profiles of forestry contractors and development of the forestry-contracting sector in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 28:395–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström C, Öhman M, Burström L, Nordfjell T, Lindroos O. 2016. Vibration exposure in forwarder work: effects of work element and grapple type. Croat J For Eng. 37:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonborg U. 1997. Ingen man på maskinen - en förarlös vision [No man in the machine - a driverless vision]. Uppsala: Skogforsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 399). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Hanse JJ, Winkel JR. 2008. Work organisation constructs and ergonomic outcomes among European forest machine operators. Ergonomics. 51:968–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson A, Servin M. 2010. Semi-autonomous shared control of large-scale manipulator arms. Control Eng Pract. 18:1069–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson J-E. 1965. The relationship between individual characteristics of the worker and output of work in logging operations. Stockholm: Skogshögskolan. (Studia Forestalia Suecica; no. 29). [In Swedish with English summary].
   Google Scholar
• Hansson J-E. 1990. Ergonomic design of large forestry machines. Int J Ind Ergon. 5:255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund A, Andersson I-M 2013. Presence of dust and mold in the handling of forest fuels. (Working papers in transport, tourism, information technology and microdata analysis; no. 2013:17). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Hellström T, Lärkeryd P, Nordfjell T, Ringdahl O. 2009. Autonomous forest vehicles: Historic, envisioned, and state-of-the-art. Int J For Eng. 20:31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hiesl P, Benjamin JG. 2013. Applicability of international harvesting equipment productivity studies in Maine, USA: a literature review. Forests. 4:898–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. 2003. Prolegomenon to cognitive task design. In: Hollnagel E, editor. Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers; p. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD. 2005. Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hugosson M 1999. Constructing Cultural patterns from Actors’ Views on Industrial Forestry in Sweden: an interpretive study based on assessments of conceptualizations and definitions in organizational culture theory [ Doctoral thesis/Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hultåker O 2006. Entreprenörskap i skogsdrivningsbranschen - En kvalitativ studie om utvecklingen i små företag [ Doctoral disstertation/Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• IEA: Definition and Domains of ergonomics [Internet]. c2015. International Ergonomics Association [ cited 2015 Feb 6] Available from: http://www.iea.cc/whats/
   Google Scholar
• Inoue K. 1996. Operators’ mental strain in operating the high proficient forestry machine. J For Res. 1:195–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jack RJ, Oliver M. 2008. A review of factors influencing whole-body vibration injuries in forestry mobile machine operators. Int J For Eng. 19:51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen DI, Thorsvik J. 2002. Hur moderna organisationer fungerar. 2., [rev. uppl.]. ed. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Järrendal D, Tinggård Dillekås H 2007. Engreppsskördare med Head-Up Display [ Master thesis/Linköping University]. Linköping: Linköping University. [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Karltun A, Karltun J, Eklund J, Berglund M 2014. HTO - a complementary ergonomics perspective. Proceedings of the 11th Human Factors in Organizational Design And Management & The 46th Nordic Ergonomics Society Annual Conference; 2014 Aug 17–20; Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk P, Byers J, Parker R, Sullman M. 1997. Mechanisation developments within the New Zealand forest industry: the human factors. J For Eng. 8:75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klen T. 1989. Costs of occupational accidents in forestry. J Safety Res. 20:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny HF, Kiggundu MN. 1980. Towards the development of a sociotechnical systems model in woodlands mechanical harvesting. Hum Relations. 33:623–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutzschenbach M. 2006. Analyse des informations-und wissensflusses bei forstunternehmen - dargestellt am beispiel von forstunternehmen innerhalb des verbandes der agrargewerblichen wirtschaft e.v. Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. (Arbeitswissenschaftlicher Forschungsbericht; no. 2). [In German].
   Google Scholar
• Landekić M, Martinić I, Bakarić M, Šporčić M. 2013. Work ability index of forestry machine operators and some ergonomic aspects of their work. Croat J For Eng. 32:241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe J-F, Robert J-M. 2000. Using VR for efficient training of forestry machine operators. Educ Inf Technologies. 5:237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Lebel L, Farbos B, Imbeau D. 2010. Study on the effects of shift schedule on forest entrepreneur performance. In: Mitchell D, Gallagher T, eds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering (COFE); June 6‐10 2010; Auburn, AL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lewark S. 2005. Scientific reviews on ergonomics in mechanised forest operations - Introducing the five reviews of the ErgoWood project. In: Lewark S, editor. Scientific reviews of ergonomic situation in mechanized forest operations. Inst. för skogens produkter och marknader, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Lewark S, Brogt T, Kutzchenbach M, Steomert S, Westmayer T. 2010. Learning, knowledge transfer and competence development in forestry operations small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Freiburg im Breisgau: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. (Arbeitswissenshaftlicher Forchungsbericht no. 10).
   Google Scholar
• Lewark S, Kastenholz E. 2007. Sustainability of work as challenge for forest work science. Proceedings of the International symposium “Bottlenecks, solutions, and priorities in the context of functions of forest resources” - The 150th anniversary of forestry education in Turkey; 2007. Turkey: Univ. of Istanbul, Faculty of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroos O. 2009. Relationships between observed and perceived deviations from normative work procedures. Ergonomics. 52:1487–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. 2007. Association between sitting and occupational LBP. Eur Spine J. 16:283–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungberg JK, Neely G. 2007. Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. J Environ Psychol. 27:44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren B 2009. Kinematic control of redundant knuckle boom with automatic pathfollowing functions [ Doctoral thesis/Royal Institute of Technology]. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez B. Visualization of the information for reducing the cognitive work load for Harvester Machine Operators. Complex Interaction in Specialized Vehicles. In: Wouters IHC, Tieben R, Kimman FPF, Offermans SAM, Nagtzaam HAH, eds. Proceedings of SIDeR ‘09, ’Flirting with the Future’, Eindhoven University of Technology. April 15–17 2009. Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin M, Malmberg A, Näslund C-O. 2005. Head-up display i engreppsskördare. Uppsala: Skogforsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 599). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Magagnotti N, Picchi G, Sciarra G, Spinelli R. 2014. Exposure of mobile chipper operators to diesel exhaust. Ann Occup Hyg. 58:217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manner J, Nordfjell T, Lindroos O. 2013. Effects of the number of assortments and log concentration on time consumption for forwarding. Silva Fennica. 47:19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield NJ, Holmlund P, Lundström R, Nordfjell T, Staal-Wästerlund D. 2002. Vibration exposure in a forestry machine fitted with a saddle type suspension seat. Int J Vehicle Des. 30:223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne B, Chen X, Hann C, Parker R Robotisation of forestry harvesting in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA), 12–14 Jun 2013, pp. 1609–1614.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell D, Gallagher T, Thomas R. 2008. The human factors of implementing shift work in logging operations. J Agric Saf Health. 14:391–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohtashami S, Bergkvist I, Löfgren B, Berg S. 2012. A GIS approach to analyzing off-road transportation: a case study in Sweden. Croat J For Eng. 33:275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy G, Vanderburg M. 2007. Modelling the economics of extended shift and 24/7 forest harvesting. New Zealand J For. 52:15.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy T, Oliver ML. 2008. Development and design of a dynamic armrest for hydraulic-actuation joystick controlled mobile machines. Appl Ergon. 39:316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nåbo A. 1990. Operator workload in forest machines - studies in precommercial thinning-, thinning- and final felling operations. [Licentiate thesis/Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences] Garpenberg: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls A, Bren L, Humphreys N. 2004. Harvester productivity and operator fatigue: working extended hours. Int J For Eng. 15:57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis M, Lyons M. 2002. Health and safety issues and perceptions of forest harvesting contractors in Ireland. Health. 13:69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen A. 2006. Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe. Joensuu: University of Joensuu. (Research Notes; no. 169).
   Google Scholar
• Nordén B, Thor M. 2000. Belysningsmiljö på skogsmaskiner vid användande av gasurladdningslampor. [The luminous environment in forest machine work while using gas-discharge lamps]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, SkogForsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 456). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Nordfjell T, Björheden R, Thor M, Wästerlund I. 2010. Changes in technical performance, mechanical availability and prices of machines used in forest operations in Sweden from 1985 to 2010. Scand J For Res. 25:382–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén J, Rosca C, Rosengren P. 2008. Riktlinjer för presentation av apteringsinformation i skogsskördare [Guidelines for presentation of bucking information in forest harvesters]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, SkogForsk. (Arbetsrapport; no. 653). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA. 2002. The design of everyday things. First Basic paperback ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacka W, Moskalik T, Paschalis-Jakubowicz P, Zastocki D. 2006. Implementation and socio-economic impact of wood harvesting mechanization in Poland. Warsaw: Warsaw Agricultural University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacka WŁ. 2012. Selected workload elements of the machine operators working in timber harvesting. Ergonomic point of view. Acta Sci Pol. Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria. 11:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha P, Kwatra S. 2011. Role of ergonomics in reduction of occupational health hazards in forestry. Asian J Home Sci. 6:302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Okunribido OO, Magnusson M, Pope MH. 2006. Low back pain in drivers: the relative role of whole-body vibration, posture and manual materials handling. J Sound Vib. 298:540–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen E, Pilkerton S, Garland J, Sessions J. 1991. Computer aided bucking on a mechanized harvester. J For Eng. 2:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz Morales D 2015. Virtual Holonomic Constraints: from academic to industrial applications [ Doctoral Thesis/Umeå University]. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Østensvik T, Nilsen P, Veiersted KB. 2008a. Muscle activity patterns in the neck and upper extremities among machine operators in different forest vehicles. Int J for Eng. 19:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Østensvik T, Veiersted KB, Cuchet E, Nilsen P, Hanse JJ, Carlzon C, Winkel J. 2008b. A search for risk factors of upper extremity disorders among forest machine operators: A comparison between France and Norway. Int J Ind Ergon. 38:1017–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osvalder A-L, Ulfvengren P. 2008. Människa-tekniksystem. In: Bohgard M, Karlsson S, Lovén E, Mikaelsson L-Å, Mårtensson L, Osvalder A-L, Rose L, Ulfvengren P, editor. Arbete och teknik på människans villkor. Stockholm: Prevent. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen H. 2005. Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments. Silva Fennica. 39:89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen H, Heikkilä M. 2007. Visuospatial cognitive abilities in cut-to-length single-grip timber harvester work. Int J Ind Ergon. 37:771–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen H, Uusitalo J, Väätäinen K. 2004. Characteristics and significance of a harvester operators’ working technique in thinning. Int J For Eng. 15:67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Palander T, Ovaskainen H, Tikkanen L. 2012. An adaptive work study method for identifying the human factors that influence the performance of a human-machine system. For Sci. 58:377–389.
   Google Scholar
• Palmroth L 2011. Performance monitoring and operator assistance systems in mobile machines [ Doctoral thesis/Tampere University of Technology] Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Parise D. 2004. The competence of forest-machine operator and tacit knowledge case study. In: Ranta P, editor. Proceedings of the international seminar on simulator-based training of forest machine operators. Joensuu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Passicot P, Murphy G. 2013. Effect of work schedule design on productivity of mechanised harvesting operations in Chile. New Zealand J For Sci. 43:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson G, Olsson A, Ekengren M, Andersson W, Lindbäck L. 2003. Utvecklingen av arbetsmiljö och produktion i skogsbruket går vidare [The development of the work environment and production in forestry continues]. Solna: Arbetsmiljöverket, Publikationsservice. Arbetsmiljöverket. (Rapport; no. 8). [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Pontén B. 2000. Forestworkers - working-life and efficiency - interviews with forestworkers, entrepreneurs, supervisors and chiefs. Garpenberg: Högskolan Dalarna. (Arbetsdokument; no. 2000:4). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Poom L, Löfroth C, Nordén B, Thor M. 2007. Testing human visual detection with xenon and halogen lamps as used on forest machines. Int J For Eng. 18:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Punnett L, Wegman DH. 2004. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 14:13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purfürst T. 2010. Learning curves of harvester operators. Croat J For Eng. 31:89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purfürst T, Erler J. 2006. The precision of productivity models for the harvester – do we forget the human factor. In: Ackerman P, Längin D, Antonides M, eds. Proceedings of IUFRO Precision Forestry Symposium, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 5–10 March 2006. Stellenbosch University; p. 465–474.
   Google Scholar
• Rådström L. 2014. Forest industries current situation. In: Rådström L, Thor M, eds. Value chains in the forest sector: definition, current status and urgent areas of development (Journal of the Swedish Royal Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 1, pp. 10–12.). Stockholm: Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien.
   Google Scholar
• Ranta P. 2009. Added values of forestry machine simulator based training. Proceedings of the International conference on multimedia and ICT education. Lisbon, Portugal: Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J. 1983. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions Systems Man Cybernetics. SMC-13:257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason J, Hobbs A. 2003. Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rehn B, Bergdahl IA, Ahlgren C, From C, Järvholm B, Lundström R, Nilsson T, Sundelin G. 2002. Musculoskeletal symptoms among drivers of all-terrain vehicles. J Sound Vib. 253:21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn B, Lundström R, Nilsson L, Liljelind I, Järvholm B. 2005a. Variation in exposure to whole-body vibration for operators of forwarder vehicles – aspects on measurement strategies and prevention. Int J Ind Ergon. 35:831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn B, Nilsson T, Lundström R, Hagberg M, Burström L. 2009. Neck pain combined with arm pain among professional drivers of forest machines and the association with whole-body vibration exposure. Ergonomics. 52:1240–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn B, Nilsson T, Olofsson B, Lundström R. 2005b. Whole-body vibration exposure and non-neutral neck postures during occupational use of all-terrain vehicles. Ann Occup Hyg. 49:267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl O, Lindroos O, Hellström T, Bergström D, Athanassiadis D, Nordfjell T. 2011. Path tracking in forest terrain by an autonomous forwarder. Scand J For Res. 26:350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollenhagen C. 2000. A framework for assessment of organisational characteristics and their influences on safety. Saf Sci Monitor. 4:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rottensteiner C, Tsioras P, Neumayer H, Stampfer K. 2013. Vibration and noise assessment of tractor-trailer and truck-mounted chippers. Silva Fennica. 47:14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders MS, McCormick EJ. 1993. Human factors in engineering and design. 7. ed New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sands R, editor. 2013. Forestry in a global context. 2nd ed. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sankar S, Afonso M. 1993. Design and testing of lateral seat suspension for off-road vehicles. J Terramechanics. 30:371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter N, Woods D, Billings C. 1997. Automation surprises. Handb Hum Factors Ergon. 2:1926–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin LM, Owende PMO, Kanali CL, Lyons J, Ward SM. 2004. Influence of tyre inflation pressure on whole-body vibrations transmitted to the operator in a cut-to-length timber harvester. Appl Ergon. 35:253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slappendel C, Laird I, Kawachi I, Marshall S, Cryer C. 1993. Factors affecting work-related injury among forestry workers: A review. J Safety Res. 24:19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton N, Ashleigh M, Roberts A, Xu F. 2001. Testing Hollnagel’s contextual control model: assessing team behaviour in a human supervisory control task. Int J Cogn Ergon. 5:111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn R, Ackerman S, Ackerman P. 2011. Shift scheduling in mechanised harvesting operations in South Africa. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. (ICFR Bulletin; no. 05/2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sullman MJM. 1998. Increasing seat belt usage in logging machinery. Int J Ind Ergon. 21:397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synwoldt U, Gellerstedt S. 2003. Ergonomic initiatives for machine operators by the Swedish logging industry. Appl Ergon. 34:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangen S. 2003. An overview of frequently used performance measures. Work Study. 52:347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Teljstedt H. 1974. Artificial lighting in forest machine operations – Ergonomic aspects of sight and light. Stockholm: Royal College of Forestry. (Studia Forestalia Suecica; no. Nr 120). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Tervo K, Palmroth L, Koivo H. 2010. Skill evaluation of human operators in partly automated mobile working machines. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 7:133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Tucker DW, Smith L, Rummer R. 1994. The anthropometry of forest machine operators in the Southern USA. J For Eng. 5:33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen M. 2001. Assessing harvester operators’ mental workload using continuous ECG recording technique. Int J Cogn Ergon. 5:213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Väyrynen S. 1984. Safety and ergonomics in the maintenance of heavy forest machinery. Accid Anal Prev. 16:115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestlund K, Hellström T. 2006. Requirements and system design for a robot performing selective cleaning in young forest stands. J Terramechanics. 43:505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vik T. 2005. Working conditions for forest machine operators and contractors in six European countries. Uppsala: The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Report; no. 25).
   Google Scholar
• Vik T, Veiersted B. 2005. Social conditions, safety and health of forest machine operators. In: Lewark S, editor. Scientific reviews of ergonomic situation in mechanized forest operations. Inst. för skogens produkter och marknader, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wästerlund DS. 1998. A review of heat stress research with application to forestry. Appl Ergon. 29:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim A. 1998. Working in a moving environment. Ergonomics. 41:1845–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg S 2014. Semi-automating forestry machines: motion planning, system integration, and human-machine interaction [ Doctoral thesis/Umeå University]. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Westerberg S, Shiriaev A. 2013. Virtual environment-based teleoperation of forestry machines: designing future interaction methods. J Hum-Rob Interact. 2:84–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens CD, Hollands JG. 1999. Engineering psychology and human performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada Y. 1996. A comparison of six parallel levers and two joysticks for the maneuverability of forwarders. J For Res. 1:199–203.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada Y. 1998. Two effective methods for evaluating mental work load on machine-operators — Fractal dimensional analysis with the CGSA method. J For Res. 3:151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Zylberstein M. 1992. Information ergonomics in forestry machines – Character, handling and presentation of the information in a two-grip harvester. Garpenberg: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Uppsatser och resultat; no. 237). [In Swedish with English abstract].
   Google Scholar