Threefold sustainability impact assessment method comparison for renewable energy value chains

References

• Asikainen A, Ilvesniemi H, Sievänen R, Vapaavuori E, Muhonen T, editors. 2012. Bioenergia, ilmastonmuutos ja Suomen metsät. Metlan työraportteja /Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 240. p. 211. ISBN 978‐951‐40‐2378‐1 (PDF). Saatavissa. Available from: http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2012/mwp240.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Athanassiadis D, Lidestav G, Nordfjell T. 2002. Energy use and emissions due to the manufacture of a forwarder. Resour Conserv Recy. 34:149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg S, Rametsteiner E, Prokofieva I, Edwards D, Harou P, Net EL, Vötter D, Välimäki T, Byrne I, Szirmay B, et al. 2011. Tools for sustainability impact assessment: manual for data collection for regional and European cases. EFI Technical Report 36. Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berg S, Valinger E, Lind T, Suominen T, Tuomasjukka D. 2016. Comparison of co-existing forestry and reindeer. Silva Fenn. 50:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caufape Poca M, Valbuena R, Tuomasjukka D, Packalén P. 2012. Evaluating the potential of airborne laser scanning (ALS) for sustainability impact assessment with ToSIA tool. Paper presented at GeoMundus 2012 – Conference on Geosciences, Geoinformation and Environment; 9–10 November 2012; Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente T, González-García S, Athanassiadis D, Nordfjell T. 2016. Fuel consumption and GHG emissions of forest biomass supply chains in Northern Sweden: a comparison analysis between integrated and conventional supply chains. Scand J For Res. 1–14. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1259424
   Google Scholar
• den Herder M, Kolström M, Lindner M, Suominen T, Tuomasjukka D, Pekkanen M. 2012. Sustainability impact assessment on the production and use of different wood and fossil fuels employed for energy production in North Karelia, Finland. Energies. 5:4870–4891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. COM (2010)11. Report from the commission to the council and the European parliament on sustainability requirements for the use of solid and gaseous biomass sources in electricity, heating and cooling. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Commission staff working document SWD(2014)259. State of play on the sustainability of solid and gaseous biomass used for electricity, heating and cooling in the EU. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. COM(2016)767 final. Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Off J Eur Union. 140:16–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparatos A, Scolobig A. 2012. Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecol Econ. 80:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinée JB, Huppes G, Heijungs R, Van Der Voet E. 2009. Research strategy, programmes and exemplary projects on life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) - Deliverable 22 of work package 7 of the CALCAS project.:97. Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M, Cocco P, Desaubies Y, Henze M, Hertel O, Johnson R, Kastrup U, Laconte P, et al. 2012. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy. 45:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijungs R, Huppes G, Guinée J. 2009. A scientific framework for LCA. Deliverable D15 CALCAS Project (Coordination action for innovation in life-cycle analysis for sustainability). Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2006. ISO 14040 Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva; p. 20. Technical Committee: ISO/TC 207/SC 5.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers P, Junginger M. 2013. The “debt” is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. 7:373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm EL, Berg S, Hansson PA. 2010. Energy efficiency and the environmental impact of harvesting stumps and logging residues. Eur J For Res. 129:1223–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner M, Suominen T, Palosuo T, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Verweij P, Zudin S, Päivinen R. 2010. ToSIA. A tool for sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood-chains. Ecol Modell. 221:2197–2205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner M, Werhahn-Mees W, Suominen T, Vötter D, Zudin S, Pekkanen M, Päivinen R, Roubalova M, Kneblik P, Brüchert F, et al. 2012. Conducting sustainability impact assessments of forestry-wood chains: examples of ToSIA applications. Eur J For Res. 131:21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews R, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Mortimer N, Rix J, Schelhaas MJ, Jenkins T, Hogan G, Mackie E, Morris A, Randle T. 2014. Review of literature and key issues on biogenic carbon and life cycle assessment of forest bioenergy. For Res. [Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, UK], p. 322.
   Google Scholar
• Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque JF, Lee D, Mendoza B, et al. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge (UK) and New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 659–740.
   Google Scholar
• Nabuurs G-J, Arets EJMM, Schelhaas M-J. 2017. European forests show no carbon debt, only a long parity effect. For Policy Econ. 75:120–125. [ Special section on The economics of carbon sequestration in forestry.]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L. 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. 60:498–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Päivinen R, Lindner M, Rosén K, Lexer MJ. 2012. A concept for assessing sustainability impacts of forestry-wood chains. Eur J For Res. 131:7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidsma P, König H, Feng S, Bezlepkina I, Nesheim I, Bonin M, Sghaier M, Purushothaman S, Sieber S, Van Ittersum MK, Brouwer F. 2011. Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries. Land Use Policy. 28:604–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic. 15:281–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Management Council. 2000. Requirements for environmental products declarations. EPD. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tscherning K, König B, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S. 2008. Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European commission—an overview. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P, editors. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Berlin: Springer; p. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomasjukka D, Berg S, Lindner M. 2014. Managing sustainability of Fennoscandian forests and their use by law and/or agreement: for whom and which purpose? Sustainability. 6:18–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomasjukka D, Martire S, Lindner M, Athanassiadis D, Kühmaier M, Tumajer J, Vis M, Spinelli R, Dees M, Prinz R, et al. 2017. Sustainability impacts of increased forest biomass feedstock supply – a comparative assessment of technological solutions. Int J For Eng. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R. 2009. Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA. Deliverable D18 work package 5 CALCAS project (Coordination action for innovation in life-cycle analysis for sustainability). Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Wu R, Yang D, Chen J. 2014. Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability. 6:4200–4226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL, Buonamici R, Masoni P, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Ekvall T, Bersani R, Bienkowska A, Pretato U. 2008. Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice - Deliverable D7 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project. Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N. 2012. Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy. 4:761–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar