568
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impacts of silvicultural prescriptions and implementation of best management practices on timber harvesting costs

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 14-25 | Received 16 Oct 2018, Accepted 20 Dec 2018, Published online: 08 Jan 2019

References

  • Anderson CJLockaby BG. 2011. The effectiveness of forestry best management practices for sediment control in the southeastern united states: a literature review. South J Appl for. 35:170–177.
  • Andersson B, Evans CM. 1996. Harvesting over mature aspen stands in central Alberta. Pointe Claire (PQ): Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada (FERIC). Special Report SR112.
  • Aust WM, Blinn CR. 2004. Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: an overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002). Water Air Soil Pollut. 4:5–36.
  • Bolding MC, Kellogg LD, Davis CT. 2009. Productivity and costs of an integrated mechanical forest fuel reduction operation in southwest Oregon. For Prod J. 59:35–46.
  • Clayton JL, Kellogg G, Forrester N. 1987. Soil disturbance-tree growth relations in Central Idaho clear-cuts. USDA Forestry Service Research Note INT-372. p. 6. Intermountain Research Station, Logan, Utah.
  • Clinton BD. 2011. Stream water responses to timber harvest: riparian buffer width effectiveness. For Ecol Manag. 261:979–988.
  • Contreras MA, Parrott DL, Chung W. 2016. Designing skid-trail networks to reduce skidding cost and soil disturbance for ground-based timber harvesting operations. For Sci. 62:48–58.
  • Cristan R, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM, Munsell JF, Schilling E. 2016. Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: Literature review. For Ecol Manag. 360:133–151.
  • Davis KP. 1966. Forest management: regulation and valuation. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Edwards PJWilliard KWJ. 2010. Efficiencies of forestry best management practices for reducing sediment and nutrient losses in the eastern united states. J for. 108:245–249.
  • Gan J, Smith CT. 2007. Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: the case for East Texas, USA. Biomass Bioenergy. 31:623–630.
  • Gumus S, Turk Y. 2016. A new skid trail pattern design for farm tractors using linear programing and geographical information systems. Forests. 7:306.
  • Han H-S 2007. Economics of soil disturbance. USDA Forest Service Proceedings. RMRS-P-44. Fort Collins (CO).
  • Han H-S, Lee HW, Johnson LR. 2004. Economic feasibility of an integrated harvesting system for small-diameter trees in southwest Idaho. For Prod J. 54:21–27.
  • Han S-K, Han H-S, Page-Dumroese DS, Johnson LR. 2009. Soil compaction associated with cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting of a coniferous forest. Can J For Res. 39:976–989.
  • Helms J, Ed. 1998. The dictionary of forestry. Bethesda: Society of American Foresters.
  • Hiesl P. 2013. Productivity standards for whole-tree and cut-to-length harvesting systems in Maine [Master Thesis]. Orono (ME, USA): University of Maine - School of Forest Resources.
  • Hiesl P, Benjamin JG. 2013. A multi-stem feller-buncher cycle-time model for partial harvest of small-diameter wood stands. Int J For Eng. 24:101–108.
  • Hiesl P, Benjamin JG, Roth BE. 2015. Evaluating harvest costs and profit of commercial thinnings in softwood stands in west-central Maine: a case study. For Chron. 91:150–160.
  • Hiesl P, Crandall MS, Weiskittel A, Benjamin JG, Wagner RG. 2017b. Evaluating the long-term influence of alternative commercial thinning regimes and harvesting systems on projected net present value of pre-commercially thinned spruce – fir stands in northern Maine. Can J For Res. 47:203–214.
  • Hiesl P, Crandall MS, Weiskittel AR, Kizha AR. 2017a. Assessing alternative silvicultural prescriptions for mid-rotation, unthinned, spruce-fir stands in Maine. Forests. 8:370.
  • Kelly MC, Germain RH, Bick S. 2017. Impacts of forestry best management practices on logging costs and productivity in the Northeastern USA. J For. 115:503–512.
  • Kizha AR, Han H-S. 2015. Forest residues recovered from whole-tree timber harvesting operations. Eur J For Eng. 1:46–55.
  • Kizha AR, Han H-S. 2016. Processing and sorting forest residues: cost, productivity and managerial impacts. Biomass Bioenergy. 93:97–106.
  • Kluender R, Lortz D, McCoy W, Stokes B, Klepac J. 1998. Removal intensity and tree size effects on harvesting cost and profitability. For Prod J. 48:54–59.
  • Kluender R, Lortz D, MCCoy W, Stokes BKlepac J. 1998. Removal intensity and tree size effects on harvesting cost and profitability. For Prod J. 48:54–59.
  • Kranabetter JM, Sanborn P, Chapman BK, Dube S. 2006. The contrasting response to soil disturbance between lodgepole pine and hybrid white spruce in sub-boreal forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 70:1591–1599.
  • Labelle ER, Jaeger D. 2011. Soil compaction caused by cut-to-length forest operations and possible short-term natural rehabilitation of soil density. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 75:2314.
  • Li Y, Wang J, Miller G, McNeel J. 2006. Production economics of harvesting small diameter hardwood stands in central Appalachia. For Prod J. 56:81–86.
  • Lickwar P, Hickman C, Cubbage FW. 1992. Costs of protecting water quality during harvesting on private forestlands in the southeast. South J Appl For. 16:13–20.
  • Miyata ES. 1980. Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. St. Paul (Minnesota): Northern central forest experiment Station, US forest service. General Technical Report Nr. NC-55 p. 16.
  • Naghdi R, Solgi A, Zenner EK, Tsioras PA, Nikooy M. 2016. Soil disturbance caused by ground-based skidding at different soil moisture conditions in Northern Iran. Int J For Eng. 27:169–178.
  • Nakagawa M, Hamatsu J, Saitou T, Ishida H. 2007. Effect of tree size on productivity and time required for work elements in selective thinning by a harvester. Int J For Eng. 18:24–28.
  • Nugent C, Kanali C, Owende PM, Nieuwenhuis M, Ward S. 2003. Characteristic site disturbance due to harvesting and skidding machinery traffic on sensitive forest sites with peat soils. For Ecol Manag. 180:85–98.
  • Nyland R. 2016. Silviculture: concepts and applications. USA: McGraw-Hills Companies, Inc.; p. 633.
  • Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen M, Terry T. 2010. Maintaining soil productivity during forest or biomass-to-energy thinning harvests in the western United States. West J Appl For. 25:5–11.
  • Pierzchała M, Talbot B, Astrup R. 2016. Measuring wheel ruts with close-range photogrammetry. For Int J For Res. 89:383–391.
  • Sahoo K, Bilek E, Bergman R, Kizha ARMani S. 2018. Economic analysis of forest residues supply chain options to produce enhanced-quality feedstocks:. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. 1-21.
  • Sawyers BC, Bolding MC, Aust WM, Lakel WA. 2012. Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont. J Soil Water Conserv. 67(4):300–310.
  • Shaffer RM, Hanley HL, Worrell EG, Aust WM. 1998. Forestry BMP implementation costs for Virginia. For Prod J. 48:27–29.
  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N. 2010. Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations. Scand J For Res. 25:69–77.
  • Thor M, Stenlid J. 2005. Heterobasidion annosum infection of Picea abies following manual or mechanized stump treatment. Scand J For Res. 20:154–164.
  • Wang J, Long C, McNeel J. 2004. Production and cost analysis of a feller-buncher and grapple skidder in central appalachian hardwood forests. For Prod J. 54:159–167.
  • Wear LR, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Strahm BD, Dolloff CA. 2013. Effectiveness of best management practices for sediment reduction at operational forest stream crossings. For Ecol Manag. 289:551–561.
  • Wilkerson E, Hagan JM, Siegel DWhitman AA. 2006. The effectiveness of different buffer widths for protecting headwater stream temperature in maine. For Sci. 52:220–231.
  • Wilson B, Wilson L. 2001. An economic perspective on clear-cut harvesting. For Chron. 77:467–473.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.