Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 44, 2005 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
81
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of impulse noise on transiently evoked otoacoustic emission in soldiers Efectos del ruido impulsivo sobre las emisiones otoacústicas evocadas por transitorios en soldados

Wieslaw Konopka Department of Audiological Diagnostics, Medical University of Lodz, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Malgorzata Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Department of Physical Hazards, Poland
,
Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Department of Physical Hazards, Poland
,
Antoni Grzanka Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
&
Piotr Zalewski Department of Audiological Diagnostics, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Pages 3-7 | Received 02 Oct 2002, Accepted 30 Oct 2004, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Attias, J. & Bresloff, I. 1996. Noise Induced Temporary Otoacoustic Emission Shifts. Journal of Basic & Clinical Physiology & Pharmacology, 7(3),221–233.
  • Engdahl, B., Woxen, O., Arnesen, A. & Mair, I. 1996. Transient evoked ototoacoustic emissions as screening for hearing losses at the shool for military training. Scand Audiol, 25, 71–78.
  • Franklin, D.J., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Stagner, B.B. & Martin, G.K. 1991. Altered susceptibility of 2 f1-f2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res, 53, 185–208.
  • Henderson, D, Subramaniam, M & Boettcher, FA. 1993. Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: an old topic revisited. Ear Hear, 14, 152–168.
  • Hotz, M.A., et al. 1993. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol /Stockh/, 113, 478–482.
  • Kemp, D.T. 1982. Cochlear echoes: implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: R.P. Hamernik, D. Henderson & R.J. Salvi (eds.) New Perspectives on Noise-induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven Press, pp. 189–206.
  • Konopka, W, Zalewski, P. & Pietkiewicz, P. 2001. Evaluation of transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions before and after shooting practice. Noise & Health, 3(10),29–37.
  • Lucertini, M., Bergamaschi, A. & Urbani, L. 1996. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in occupational medicine as an auditory screening test for employment. Br J Audiol, 30(2),79–88.
  • Lucertini, M., Tufarelli, D. & Urbani, L. 1998. Influence of 6-8 kHz audiometric notch on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 255, 491–494.
  • Norton, S.J., Mott, J.B. & Champlin, CA. 1989. Behaviour of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res, 38, 243–258.
  • Oeken, J. 1998. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in acute acoustic trauma. Noise & Health, 1, 56–66.
  • Oeken, J. & Menz, D. 1996. Amplitude changes in distortion products of otoacoustic emissions after acute noise exposure. Laryngorhinooto-logie, 75(5),265–269.
  • Prasher, D. & Sulkowski, W. 1999. The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 12(2),181–192.
  • Schmied, R. A. 1986. Acoustic distortion product in ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1481–1490.
  • Sliwinska-Kowalska, M. 1998. The role of evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Audiological Medicine, 7(1),29–45.
  • Sliwinska-Kowalska, M., Kotylo, P. & Hendler, B. 1999. Comparing changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission and pure-tone audiometry following short exposure to industrial noise. Noise & Health, 2, 50–57.
  • Subramaniam, M., Henderson, D. & Spongr, V 1994. The relationship among distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked potential thresholds and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Ear Hear, 15, 299–309.
  • Sutton, LA., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K. & Whitehead, M. L. 1994. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery, and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res, 75, 161–174.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.