82
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Dynamics of real time DPOAE contralateral suppression in chinchillas and humans Dinámica de la supresión contralateral de las DPOAE en tiempo real en chinchillas y humanos

, , , &
Pages 118-129 | Received 11 Aug 2003, Accepted 25 May 2004, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Bassim, M.K., Miller, R.L., Buss, E. & Smith, D.W 2003. Rapid adaptation of the 2f-f2 DPOAE in humans: Binaural and contralateral stimulation effects. Hear Res, 182, 140–152.
  • Buno Jr, W 1978. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp Neuro, 59, 62–74.
  • Collet, L., Kemp, D.T., Veuillet, E., Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., et al. 1990. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res, 43, 251–261.
  • Cody, A.R. & Johnstone, B.M. 1982. Acoustically evoked activity of single efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. JAcoust Soc Am, 72, 280–282.
  • Durrant, J.D. 1998. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions—delay of effect? J Commun Disord, 31, 485–488.
  • Fex, J. 1973. Neuropharmacology and potentials of the inner ear. In A.R. Moller (ed.), Basic Mechanisms in Hearing. New York: Academic Press, pp. 377–420.
  • Galambos, R. 1956. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea. J Neurophysiol, 19, 424–437.
  • Guinan, J.J., Warr, WB. & Norris, B.E. 1983. Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol, 221, 358–370.
  • Gummer, M., Yates, GK. & Johnstone, B.M. 1988. Modulation transfer function of efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res, 36, 41–51.
  • Hill, J.C., Prasher, D.K. & Luxon, L.M. 1997. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol, 117, 343–351.
  • Hood, L.J. 1999. A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways. Laryngoscope, 109, 1745–1748.
  • Iurato, S., Smith, C.A., Eldredge, D.H., Henderson, D., Carr, C, et al. 1978. Distribution of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in the chinchilla’s cochlea. J Comp Neurol, 182, 57–76.
  • Kalman, R.E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transaction of the ASME - Journal of Basic Engineering, 1960, 35–45.
  • Kemp, D.T. 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 64, 1386–1391.
  • Kemp, D.T. 1979. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 224, 37–45.
  • Kemp, D.T. & Souter, M. 1988. A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations. Hear Res, 34, 49–62.
  • Kim, D.O., Dorn, PA., Neely, S.T. & Gorga, M.P 2001. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2, 31–40.
  • Kimura, R.S. & Wersall, J. 1962. Termination of the olivocochlear bundle in relation to the outer hair cells of the organ of Corti in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol, 55, 11–32.
  • Konishi, T. & Slepian, J.Z. 1971. Effects of the electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cochlear potentials recorded with intracochlear electrodes in guinea pigs. J Acoust Soc A, 49, 1762–1769.
  • Kujawa, S.G. & Liberman, M.C. 2001. Effects of olivocochlear feedback on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2, 268–278.
  • Li, X., Sokolov, Y. & Kunov, H. 2000. Method for real time recording of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Proceedings of the XXV International Congress of Audiology, The Hague, The Netherlands. p. 158.
  • Liberman, M.C. 1988. Response properties of cochlear efferents: Monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J Neurophysiol, 60, 1779–1798.
  • Liberman, M.C. 1989. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: Suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res, 38, 47–56.
  • Liberman, M.C. & Brown, M.C. 1986. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res, 24, 17–36.
  • Liberman, M.C, Puria, S. & Guinan, J.J. Jr. 1996. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f -f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 3572–3584.
  • Lima da Costa, D., Chibois, A., Erre, J.P, Blanchet, C, de Sauvage, R.C. & Aran, J.M. 1997. Fast, slow, and steady-state effects of contralateral acoustic activation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in awake guinea pigs: action of gentamicin. J Neurophysiol, 78, 1826–1836.
  • Lind, O. 1994. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Attempts to find a latency. Br JAudiol, 28, 219–225.
  • Maison, S., Durrant, J, Gallineau, C, Micheyl, C. & Collet, L. 2001. Delay and temporal integration in medial olivocochlear bundle activation in humans. Ear Hear, 22, 65–74.
  • Maybeck, P. (ed.) 1979. Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control, Volume 1. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Morest, D.K. 1973. Auditory neurons of the brain stem. Adv Otorhino-laryngol, 20, 337–356.
  • Mott, J.B., Norton, S.J, Neely, S.T. & Warr, W.B. 1989. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Hear Res, 38, 229–242.
  • Moulin, A. & Carrier, S. 1998. Time course of the medial olivocochlear efferent effect on otoacoustic emissions in humans. Neuroreport, 9, 3741–3744.
  • Osen, K.K. 1972. Projection of the cochlear nuclei on the inferior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neurol, 144, 355–372.
  • Puel, J.L. & Rebillard, G 1990. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 1630–1635.
  • Rasmussen, GL. 1946. The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol, 84, 141–220.
  • Robertson, D. 1984. Horseradish peroxidase injection of physiologically characterized afferent and efferent neurons in the guinea pig spiral ganglion. Hear Res, 15, 113–121.
  • Robertson, D. & Gummer, M. 1985. Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res, 20, 63–77.
  • Siegel, J.H. & Kim, D.O. 1982. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear bio-mechanical nonlinearity Hear Res, 6, 171–182.
  • Smith, C.A. 1961. Innervation patterns of the cochlea. The internal hair cell. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 72, 504–527.
  • Smith, C.A. & Rasmussen, GL. 1963. Recent observations on the olivocochlear bundle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 72, 489–497.
  • Spoendlin, H.H. & Gacek, R.R. 1963. Electronmicroscopic study of the afferent innervation of the organ of Corti of the cat. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 56, 660–686.
  • Sridhar, T.S., Liberman, M.C, Brown, M.C. & Sewell, WF. 1995. A novel cholinergic ‘slow effect’ of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig. J Neurosci, 15, 3667–3678.
  • Thompson, A.M. & Thompson, G.C. 1991. Posteroventral cochlear nucleus projections to olivocochlear neurons. J Comp Neurol, 303, 267–285.
  • Warr, W.B. 1975. Olivocochlear and vestibular efferent neurons of the feline brain stem: their location, morphology and number determined by retrograde axonal transport and acetylcholinesterase histochemistry. J Comp Neurol, 161, 159–181.
  • Warr, WB. & Guinan, J.J. 1979. Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: Two separate systems. Brain Res, 173, 152–155.
  • Wiederhold, M.L. & Kiang, NY 1970. Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am, 48, 950–965.
  • Ye, Y, Machado, D.G & Kim, D.O. 2000. Projection of the marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus to olivocochlear neurons in the cat. J Comp Neurol, 420, 127–138.
  • Young, V, Harrison, R.V., Dolan, A. & Kunov, H. 2000. Comparison of three distortion product otoacoustic emission devices. Canadian Acoustics, 28, 136–137.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.