References
- American National Standards Institute. Methods for Calculating of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI, New York 1997, ANSI S3.5-1997
- Bosman A. J., Smoorenburg G. F. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology 1995; 34: 260–284
- Duquesnoy A. J. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1136–1144
- Elberling C., Ludvigsen C., Lyregaard P. E. Dantale: a new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol 1989; 18: 169–175
- Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–1736
- Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
- International Standards Organization. Acoustics-Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment-Part 1: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Supra-aural Earphones. ISO, Geneva 1998, ISO 389-1
- Kollmeier B., Wesselkamp M. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2412–2421
- Kramer S. E., Kapteyn T. S., Festen J. M., Tobi H. The relationships between self-reported hearing disabilities and measure of auditory disability. Audiology 1996; 35: 277–287
- Kramer S. E., Kapteyn T. S., Festen J. M. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology 1998; 37: 302–312
- Miller G. A., Heise G. A., Lichten W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test material. J Exp Psychol 1951; 41: 329–335
- Nilsson M., Soli D., Sullivan J. A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–1099
- Noordhoek I. M., Houtgast T., Festen J. M. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 1197–1212
- Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 146–154
- Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979a; 18: 43–52
- Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am 1979b; 66: 1333–1342
- Rudmin F. Speech reception thresholds for digits. J Audiol Res 1987; 27: 15–21
- Smoorenburg G. F. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 421–437
- Strike P. W. Statistical Methods in Laboratory Medicine. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 1991; 307-330
- Versveld N. J., Daalder L., Festen J. M., Houtgast T. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 1671–1684