498
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Living with cochlear implants: experiences of 17 adult patients in Sweden

&
Pages 115-121 | Received 08 Aug 2002, Accepted 12 Feb 2003, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Berliner K. I. Risks versus benefit in cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(2Pt)90–98
  • Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Rethinking Methods in Psychology, J. Smith, R. Harré, L. Van Langenhove. Sage, London 1995; 27–49
  • Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn., N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage, London 2000; 509–535
  • Cheng A. K., Niparko J. K. Cost-utility of the cochlear implant in adults. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 1214–1218
  • Faber C. E., Grontved A. M. Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2000; 543: 151–153
  • Fenichel O. The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. Norton Publishers, New York 1990
  • Gantz B. J., Tyler R. S., Knutson J. F., Woodworth G., Abbas P., et al. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1100–1106
  • Glaser B., Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York 1967
  • Hall W. A., Callery P. Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Res 2001; 11(2)257–272
  • Hammersley M. What's Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. Routledge, London 1987
  • Harris J. P., Anderson J. P., Novak R. An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: 398–404
  • Hogan A. Implant outcomes: towards a mixed methodology for evaluating the efficacy of adult cochlear implant programmes. Disabil Rehab 1997; 19(6)235–243
  • Horn K. L., McMahon N. B., McMahon D. C., Lewis J. S., Barker M., et al. Functional use of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant in the elderly. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 284–287
  • Knutson J. F., Tyler R. S., Schwartz H. A., Hinrich J. V., Santz B. J., et al. Psychological change following 18 months of cochlear implant use. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 877–882
  • Kunimoto M., Yamanaka N., Kimura T., Yoda J., Yokoyama M., et al. The benefit of cochlear implantation in the Japanese elderly. Auris Nasus Larynx 1999; 26(2)131–137
  • Maillet C. J., Tyler R. S., Jordan H. N. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 165: 31–48
  • Makhdoum M. J.A., Snik A. F.M., Van Den Broek P. Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results. J Laryngol tol 1997; 111: 1008–1017
  • Pedersen C. B., Jochumsen U., Madsen S., Koefead-Nielsen B., Johansen L. V. Results and experiences with 55 cochlear implantations. Ugeskr Laeger 2000; 162(40)5346–5350
  • Proops W., Donaldson I., Cooper H. R., Thomas J., Burell S. P., et al. Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113: 5–13
  • Ruben R. J. Eradication of communicative disorders: preventive medicine in the 21th century. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1997; 168: 55–58
  • Schuknecht H. F., Gacek M. R. Cochlear pathology in presbyacusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 1–15
  • Shin Y. J., Fraysse B., Deguine O., Valés O., Laborde M. L., et al. Benefits of cochlear implantation in elderly patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122(4)602–606
  • Tyler R. S., Kelsay D. Advantages and disadvantages reported by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Am J Otol 1990; 11(4)282–289
  • Tyler R. S., Parkinson A. J., Woodworth G. G., Lowder M. W., Gantz B. J. Performance over time of adult patients using Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102(1)508–522
  • Waltzman S. B., Cohen N. L., Shapiro W. H. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 108(4)329–333
  • Zhao F., Stephens S. D., Sim S. W., Meredith R. The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clin Otolaryngol 1997; 22(3)254–259

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.