References
- Abbas P. J., Brown C. J., Shallop J. K., Firszt J. B., Hughes M. L., et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45–59
- Brown C. J., Abbas P. J. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2202–2210
- Brown C., Abbas P. J., Gantz B. J. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 320–327
- Brown C. J., Hughes M. L., Luk B., Abbas P. J., Wolaver A., et al. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 151–163
- Burkard R. F., Sims D. The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. Am J Audiol 2001; 10: 53–61
- Eysholdt U., Schreiner C. Maximum length sequences: a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses. Audiology 1982; 21: 242–250
- Franck K. H., Norton S. J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 289–299
- Huang C. Q., Shepherd R. K. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity. Hear Res 1999; 132: 60–68
- Hughes M. L., Abbas P. J., Brown C. J., Gantz B. J. Using electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to facilitate creating MAPs for children with the Nucleus CI24M. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 57: 260–265
- Hughes M. L., Brown C. J., Abbas P. J., Wolaver A. A., Gervais J. P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 164–174
- Kawano A., Seldon H. L., Clark G. M., Ramsden R. T., Raine C. H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 313–326
- Lai W. K., Dillier N., Laszig R., Fisch U. Results from a pilot study using the nucleus CI24M/SP5 cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1997; 18(suppl)S35–S36
- Lina-Granade G., Collet L., Morgon A. Auditory-evoked brainstem responses elicited by maximum-length sequences in normal and sensorineural ears. Audiology 1994; 33: 218–236
- Moore B. C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing2nd edn. Academic Press, London 1982
- Shepherd R. K., Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 1997; 108: 112–144
- Thai-Van H., Chanal J. M., Coudert C., Veuillet E., Truy E., et al. Relation between NRT measurements and behavioural levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 58: 153–162
- Vischer M., Haenggeli A., Zhang J., Pelizzone M., Hausler R., et al. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997; 18(suppl)S27–S29