Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners

References

• Bacon S. P., Gleitman R. M. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 642–653
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bacon S. P., Viemeister N. F. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology 1985; 24: 117–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliaeff M., Dubus P., Leveau J. M., Repetto J. C., Vincent P. Sound processing and stimulation coding of DIGISONIC DX10 15channel cochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implant, I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer, E. S. Hochmair. International Interscience Seminars, Vienna 1994; 198–203
   Google Scholar
• Busby P. A., Tong Y. C., Clark G. M. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 124–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyon R. P., Datta A. J. Excitation produced by Schroederphase complexes: evidence for fast-acting compression in the auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 3636–3647
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cazals Y., Pelizzone M., Saudan O., Boex C. Low-pass filtering in amplitude-modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2048–2054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B., Kohlrausch A. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation: I. Detection and masking with narrowband carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 1997a; 102: 2892–2905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B., Kohlrausch A. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation: II. Spectral and temporal integration. J Acoust Soc Am 1997b; 102: 2906–2919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman R., Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am 1994a; 95: 1053–1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman R., Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am 1994b; 95: 2670–2680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert S. D., Dau T. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 1181–1196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu Q. J. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. NeuroReport 2002; 13: 1635–1639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q. J., Shannon R. V. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2570–2577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe C., Lorenzi C. Role of envelope beat cues in the detection and discrimination of second-order amplitude-modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 49–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Füllgrabe C., Meyer B., Lorenzi C. Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes. Hear Res 2003; 178: 35–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B. R., Moore B. C.J. Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection. Hear Res 1992; 64: 81–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths T. D., Penhune V., Peretz I., Dean J. L., Patterson R. D., et al. Frontal processing and auditory perception. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 919–922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hescot F., Lorenzi C., Debruille X., Camus J. F. Amplitudemodulation detection for broadband noise in a single listener with left-hemisphere damage. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 341–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlrausch A., Fassel R., Dau T. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 723–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Wable J., Moroni C., Derobert C., Frachet B., et al. Auditory temporal envelope processing in a patient with lefthemisphere damage. Neurocase 2000a; 6: 231–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Dumont A., Füllgrabe C. Use of temporal envelope cues by developmental dyslexics. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000b; 43: 1367–1379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Simpson M. I.G., Millman R. E., Griffiths T. D., Woods W. P., et al. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrowband noise carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 2001a; 110: 2470–2478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Soares C., Vonner T. Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions. J Acoust Soc Am 2001b; 110: 1030–1038
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millman R. E., Green G. G.R., Lorenzi C., Rees A. Effect of a modulation noise masker on the detection of second-order amplitude modulation. Hear Res 2003; 178: 1–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. B. C.J. Moore. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1067–1073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Sek A., Glasberg B. R. Modulation masking produced by beating modulators. J Acoust Soc Am 1999a; 106: 908–918
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Vickers D. A., Baer T., Launer S. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1999b; 105: 2757–2772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Shailer M. J., Schooneveldt G. P. Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 229–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Stone M. A., Alcantara J. I. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 307–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson L. M., Busby P. A., Clark G. M. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 442–452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon R. V. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2156–2164
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R. V. Quantitative comparison of electrically and acoustically evoked auditory perception: implications for the location of perceptual mechanisms. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 261–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R., Otto S. R. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 1990; 47: 159–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheft S., Yost W. A. Modulation detection interference with twocomponent masker modulators. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 1106–1112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shofner S., Sheft S., Guzman S. J. Responses of ventral cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to amplitude modulation by lowfrequency, two-tone complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 3592–3605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeneken H. J.M., Houtgast T. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 318–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland E. A., Viemeister N. F. The effects of frequency region and bandwidth on the temporal modulation transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 1799–1810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi G. A., Bacon S. P. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1410–1421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tandetnik S., Garnier S., Lorenzi C. Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 355–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren R. A., Festen J., Houtgast T. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 2903–2913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N. F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1364–1380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar