References
- American National Standards Institute. American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index. ANSI S3.5-1969, ANSI, New York 1969
- American National Standards Institute. American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI S3.5-1997, ANSI, New York 1997
- Aronson L., Estienne P., Arauz S. L., Pallamte S. A. Telephone speech comprehension in children with multichannel cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997; 18: S151-S152
- Brown A. M., Clark G. M., Dowell R. C., Martin L. F., Seligman P. M. Telephone use by a multichannel cochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol 1985; 99: 231–238
- Cohen N. L., Waltzman S. B., Shapiro W. H. Telephone speech comprehension with use of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 8–11
- Dorman M. F. Speech perception by adults. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Considerations, R. S. Tyler. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego 1993; 145–190
- Dorman M. F., Dove H., Parkin J., Zacharchuk S., Dankowski K. Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 368–369
- Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature test (FAAF)-linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 165–174
- French N. E., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1947; 19: 90–119
- Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatisation and frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1258–1268
- Green R. The uses and misuses of speech audiometry in rehabilitation. Speech Audiometry, 2nd edn., M. Martin. Whurr Publishers Ltd, London 1997; 150–176
- Helms J., Mu¨ller J. Selection of a cochlear implant and results of implantation. Laryngorhinootologie 1999; 78: 12–13
- Hochmair E. S., Hochmair-Desoyer I. J. Aspects of sound signal processing using the Vienna intra-and extracochlear implants. Cochlear Implants, R. A. Schindler, M. M. Merzenich. Raven Press, New York 1985; 101–110
- Holmes A. E., Frank T. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 96–101
- Kepler L. J., Terry M., Sweetman R. H. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 311–319
- Loizou P., Poroy O., Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108(2)790–802
- Lutman M. E. Speech tests in quiet and noise as a measure of auditory processing. Speech Audiometry, 2nd edn., M. Martin. Whurr Publishers Ltd, London 1997; 63–73
- Pascoe D. P. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84(suppl 23)1–40
- Skinner M., Karstaedt M. M., Miller J. D. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1982; 21: 251–268
- Summerfield A. Q., Foster J. Evaluation of Cochlear Implantation in the UK 1990-1994. Medical Research Council, Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham 1994
- Tait M., Nikolopoulos T. P., Archbold S., O'Donoghue G. M. Use of the telephone in prelingually deaf children with a multichannel cochlear implant. Otol Neurol 2001; 22: 47–52
- Terry M., Bright K., Durian M., Kepler L., Sweetman R., et al. Processing the telephone speech signal for the hearing-impaired. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 70–79
- Zerbi M., Lawson D., Wilson B. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Tenth Quarterly Progress Report November 1, 1997 through January 31, 1998. Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park 1998, NIH Project NO1-DC-5-2103