The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid

References

• American National Standards Institute. Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics. ANSI S3.22–1996, ANSI, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B. C.J. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 2277–2280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B. C.J., Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R. C., Nuetzel J. M., Rabinowitz W. M., Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 32–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burkhard M. D., Sachs R. M. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 214–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante D. K., Braida L. D. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. J Rehab Res Dev 1987; 24: 149–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. The abbreviated pro?le of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times?. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 287–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and Hearing in Communication. Van Nostrand, New York 1953
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1936; 24: 731–741
   Google Scholar
• Hansen M. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 369–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann V., Kollmeier B. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1191–1195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C. J., Blamey P. J., Martin L., Swanson B., Just Y., et al. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study. Ear Hear 2002; 23, 49S–58S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M. C., Berger E. H., Nuss R. A. Diffuse field response of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: S75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Hohmann V. Loudness estimation and compensation employing a categorical scale. Advances in Hearing Research, G. A. Manley, G. M. Klump, C. Ko¨ppl, H. Fastl, H. Oeckinghaus. World Scientific, Singapore 1995; 441–451
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn G. The pressure transformation from a diffuse field to the external ear and to the body and head surface. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 991–1000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launer S., Moore B. C.J. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. On-line gain control in a digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 262–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann R. P., Braida L. D., Durlach N. I. Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 524–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner T., Hellgren J., Arlinger S., Elberling C. A digital filter-bank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms—user preference and performance. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 373–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner T., Hellgren J., Arlinger S., Elberling C. Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 49: 40–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 93–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 317–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R., Stone M. A. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 171–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Johnson J. S., Clark T. M., Pluvinage V. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 349–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Peters R. W., Stone M. A. Benefits of linear amplification and multi-channel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 400–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Stone M. A., Alcántara J. I. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 307–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A., Bakke M. H., Mackersie C., Hellman S., Levitt H. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 3182–3187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A. C., Bakke M. H., Mackersie C., Hellman S. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 2273–2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R. W., Moore B. C.J., Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw E. A.G. The acoustics of the external ear. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, G. A. Studebaker, I. Hochberg. University Park Press, Baltimore 1980; 109–126
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1937; 9: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C.J. Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 351–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C.J., Alcántara J. I., Glasberg B. R. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 3603–3619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C.J., Wojtczak M., Gudgin E. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and ?uctuating background sounds. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 257–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren R. A., Festen J., Houtgast T. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 2903–2913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tasell D. J., Trine T. D. Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 912–922
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verschuure J., Maas A. J.J., Stikvoort E., de Jong R. M., Goedegebure A., et al. Compression and its effect on the speech signal. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 162–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuure J., Prinsen T. T., Dreschler W. A. The effect of syllabic compression and frequency shaping on speech intelligibility in hearing impaired people. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 13–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D. A., Moore B. C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass ?ltering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1646–1657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yund E. W., Buckles K. M. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1206–1223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33, 248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar