Social hearing measured with the Performance Inventory for Profound and Severe Loss: a comparison between adult multichannel cochlear implant patients and users of acoustical hearing aids

References

• Boothroyd, A. 1997. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment. Scand Aitdiol Suppl, 46, 17–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, N.L., Waltzman, S.B. & Fisher, S.G. 1993. A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group. N Engl J Med, 328, 233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraysse, B., Dillier, N., Klenzner, X, Laszig, R., Manrique, M., et al. 1998. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study. Am J Otol, 19, 591–597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gantz, B.J., Tyler, R.S., Knutson, J.F., Woodworth, G., Abbas, P., et al. 1988. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audio-logic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope, 98, 1100–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner, W.K., Hamzavi, X & Baumgartner, W.D. 1998. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol, 118, 640–645.
   Google Scholar
• Hamzavi, X, Franz, P., Baumgartner, W.D. & Gstoettner, W. 2001. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Audiology, 40, 26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris, J.P., Anderson, J.P. & Novak, R. 1995. An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Audiologic, economic, and quality-of-life changes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 121, 398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., Muller, X, Pfennigdorff, X, Schon, F., Helms, J., et al. 1996. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus). ORL J Otorhinolarvn^ol Relat Spec, 58, 127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, X, von Ilberg, C, Reimer, B., Knecht, R., Gall, V, et al. 1998. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss-implications for patient selection. Audiology, 37, 382–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.N., Shim, Y.J., Kim, K.M., Chang, M.S. & Lee, E.H. 1995. Social performance ability in multichannel cochlear implantees. Ann Otol JRhinol Laryngol Suppl, 166, 243–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maillet, C.J., Tyler, R.S. & Jordan, H.N. 1995. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 165,31-48.
   Google Scholar
• Manrique, M., Ramos, A., Morera, C, Sainz, M., Algaba, J., et al. 1998. Spanish study group on cochlear implants for persons with marginal benefit from acoustic amplification. Acta Otolaryngol, 118, 635–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T.A. & Svirsky, M.A. 2000. Speech perception by children with the Clarion (CIs) or Nucleus 22 (SPEAK) cochlear implant or hearing aids. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 185, 49–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakisa, M.J., Summerfield, A.Q., Nakisa, R.C., McCormick, B., Archbold, S., et al. 2001. Functionally equivalent ages and hearing levels of children with cochlear implants measured with pre-recorded stimuli. Br J Audio, 35, 183–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, E. & Raggio, M. 1988. Performance inventory for profound and severe loss (PIPSL). J Speech Hear Disord, 53, 42–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proops, D.W., Donaldson, I., Cooper, H.R., Thomas, I, Burrell, S.P., et al. 1999. Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients. J Laryngol Otol Suppl, 24, 5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiomi, Y, Naito, Y, Honjo, I., Fujiki, N., Kaneko, K., et al. 1999. Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing. Auris Nasus Larynx, 26, 369–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snik, A.F., Vermeulen, A.M., Brokx, J.P., Beijk, C. & van den Broek, P. 1997a. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. I. The 'equivalent hearing loss' concept. Acta Otolaryngol, 117, 750–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik, A.F., Vermeulen, A.M., Geelen, C.P., Brokx, J.P. & van den Broek, P. 1997b. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. II. Results of prelingually deaf children. Acta Otolaryngol, 117, 755–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, A.Q. & Marshall. D.H. 1995. Cochlear Implantation in the UK 1990-1994. Main Report. Nottingham: MRC Institute of Hearing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M.A. & Meyer, T.A. 1999. Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 177, 104–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teig, E., Lindeman, H.H., Tvete, O., Hanche-Olsen, S. & Rasmussen, K. 1993. Audiovisual test programs in native languages. Test material in Norwegian on. a video disc controlled by laser bar code. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 48, 199–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, R.S., Lowder, M.W., Parkinson, A.J., Woodworth, G.G. & Gantz, B.J. 1995. Performance of adult Ineraid and Nucleus cochlear implant patients after 3.5 years of use. Audiology, 34, 135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R.S., Parkinson, A.J., Fryauf-Bertchy, H., Lowder, M.W., Parkinson, W.S., et al. 1997. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implant. Scand Audiol Suppl, 46,65-71.
   Google Scholar
• Valimaa, T.T. & Sorri, M.J. 2001. Speech perception and functional benefit after cochlear implantation: a multicentre survey in Finland. Scand Audiol, 30, 112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J.E., van Olphen, A.F., Langereis, M.C., Mens, L.H., Brokx, J.P., et al. 1999. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology, 38, 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman, S.B., Cohen, N.L. & Shapiro, W.H. 1993. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 108, 329–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, J.E., Snow, K.K. & Kosinski, M. 2000. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, L.A., Seligman, P.M., Everingham, C.E., Antognelli, T., Skok, M.C., et al. 1995. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol, 115,629-637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar