Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations

References

• Bench J., Kowal A., Bamford J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol 1979; 13: 108–112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman D.R., Fager S., Ullman C., Hanson E., Logemann J. The impact of speech supplementation and clear speech on the intelligibility and speaking rate of people with traumatic brain injury. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 10: 237–242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Nuentzeq J.M., Rabinowitz W.M., Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 32–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronkhorst A.W., Plomp R. The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1508–1516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard M.D., Sachs R.M. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 214–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Gilmore C. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear 1987; 8: 119–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Gray G.A., Alexander G.C. Evaluation of a revised speech in noise (RSIN) test. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 423–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowan R.S., Brown C., Whitford L.A., Galvin K.L., Sarant J.Z., et al. Speech perception in children using the advanced speak speech-processing strategy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 318–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Loizou P.C., Fitzke J. The identification of speech in noise by cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing listeners using 6-channel signal processors. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 481–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan R.C., Knapp R.G., Miller M.C. Introductory Biostatistics for the Health Sciences. Second Edition. John Willey & Sons, New York, NY 1983
   Google Scholar
• Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D., Morgan D.E. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 87–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 85–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand S.A., Ross L., Miller S. Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: Effects of aging and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 248–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks W.D., Johnson G.D. HINT list equivalency using older listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 1335–1340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W., Mueller G.H. Audiologist Desk Reference Volume 1. Diagnostic Audiology Principles, Procedures and Practices. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman D. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman D. Clinical measurements of speech reception thresholds in noise. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 57–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I.J., Davis H., Silverman S.R., Reynolds E.G., Eldert E. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord 1952; 17: 321–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hustad K.C., Cahill M.A. Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12: 198–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliot L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1337–1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M., Niquette P.A. What can the pure-tone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss?. Hearing Journal 2000; 53: 46–53
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe J., Gascon C., Larivière M., Handfield M-F., Laroche C. Normalisation du hearing in noise test (HINT) auprès d'une population francophone bilingue et d'une population anglophone. Revue d'orthophonie et d'audiologie 2002; 26: 81–89
   Google Scholar
• Laroche C., Soli S.D., Giguère C., Lagacé J., Vaillancourt V., et al. An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs. Noise & Health 2003; 6: 17–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurence R.F., Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 31–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leduc R. Pour la réussite du dépistage précoce et continue. Centre franco-ontarien de ressources pédagogiques, Vanier, ON 1997
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Adaptive testing in audiology. Scand Audiol Suppl 1978; 6: 241–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLoed A., Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 131–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLoed A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller G.H. Speech audiometry and hearing aid fittings: going steady or casual acquaintances?. Hearing Journal 2001; 54(10)19–29
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M.J., Sullivan, J., & Soli, S.D. 1991a. Validation of a speech intelligibility test using SRT for hearing aid research. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 1960 (A).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M.J., Sullivan J., Soli S.D. Measurement and prediction of hearing handicap using an additive noise model. J Acoust Soc Am 1991b; 90: 326(A)
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M.J., Soli, S.D., & Gelnett, D. 1996. Development of the hearing in noise test for children (HINT-C). House Ear Institute, April, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Acoustical aspects of cocktail parties. Acustica 1977; 38: 186–191
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preves D.A., Sammeth C.A., Wynne M.K. Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 105: 273–84
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts T., Dhar S. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 180–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T., Henry P. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 100–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert P. Le nouveau Petit Robert: dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française. Le Robert, Paris 1995
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Cienkowski K.M. Acclimatization to hearing aids. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 129–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli S.D., Nilsson M. Assessment of communication handicap with the HINT. Hearing Instruments 1994; 45: 12–16
   Google Scholar
• Valente M., Fabry D.A., Potts L.G. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 440–449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valente M., Fabry D.A., Potts L.G., Sandlin R.E. Comparing the performance of the Widex SENSO digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 342–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valente M., Schuchman G., Potts L.G., Beck L.B. Performance of dual-microphone in-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 181–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein B.E. Hearing loss in the elderly: a new look at an old problem. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Fourth Eition, J. Katz. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1994; 597–604
   Google Scholar