Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to 1 kHz tones in noise-masked normally-hearing and sensorineurally hearing-impaired adults

References

• American National Standards Institute. 1996. American National Standard Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-1996. New York:ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Arle J.E., Kim D.O. Simulations of cochlear nucleus neural circuitry: Excitatory-inhibitory response-area types I-IV. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90(6)3106–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barajas J.J., Exposito M., Fernandez R., Martin L.J. Middle latency response to a 500-Hz tone pip in normally-hearing and in hearing-impaired subjects. Scand Audiol 1988; 17(1)21–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Boyd R.L. Early/middle evoked potentials to tone bursts in quiet, white noise and notched noise. Audiology 1985; 24: 406–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Garcia E., Johnson A. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1996; 35: 194–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Thielen K.M., Franzone D.L. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the auditory brainstem response to tone bursts in notch noise and broadband noise. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 47–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Li Li M.D., Hood L.J., Morlet T., Rose K., et al. Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-Synchrony: After the diagnosis then what?. Seminars in Hearing 2002; 23(3)209–214
   Google Scholar
• Bilak M., Kim J., Potashner S., Bohne B., Morest D. New growth of axons in the cochlear nucleus of adult chinchillas after acoustic trauma. Exp Neuro 1997; 147: 256–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R., Hecox K. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory response. I. Rate and intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1983a; 74(4)1204–1213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R., Hecox K. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity. J Acoust Soc Am 1983b; 74(4)1214–1223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R., Palmer A. Responses of chopper units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised guinea pig to clicks-in-noise and click trains. Hear Res 1997; 110: 234–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A.T., McFarland D.J. Middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: Basic issues and potential applications. Handbook of Clinical Audiology5th Edition, J. Katz. Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2002; 349–377
   Google Scholar
• Carhart R., Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Costalupes J.A., Young E.D., Gibson D.J. Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. J Neurophysiol 1984; 51: 1326–1344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgutte B. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: Observations from auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 791–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B. The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(4)2280–2289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. Narrow-band AP latencies in normal and recruiting human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65(2)463–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt J.B., Chambers R.D., Kraus N., Reeder R. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: Effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Ear Hear 2002; 23(6)502–515
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler C.G., Durrant J.D. The effects of peripheral hearing loss on the auditory brainstem response. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994; 240–250
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Hecox K. Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. Otolaryngology Clinics of North America 1978; 11: 709–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken G.M. Central auditory temporal processing: Alterations produced by factors involving the cochlea. Effects of Noise on the Auditory System, A. Dancer, D. Henderson, R. Salvi, R. Hamernik. Mosby, Philadelphia 1992; 146–155
   Google Scholar
• Gerken G.M. Alteration of central auditory processing of brief stimuli: A review and a neural model. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93(4)2038–2049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken G.M., Hesse P.S., Wiorkowski J.J. Auditory evoked response in control subjects and in patients with problem-tinnitus. Hear Res 2001; 157(1–2)52–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson D.J., Young E.D., Costalupes J.A. Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei. J Neurophysiol 1985; 53: 940–958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M., Kaminski J., Beauchaine K., Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. Journal of Speech and Hear Res 1988; 31: 87–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gott P., Hughes E. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1989; 74: 131–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenwood D., Goldberg J. Responses of neurons in the cochlear nucleus to variations in noise bandwidth and to tone-noise combinations. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 47: 1022–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumnit R.J., Grossman R.G. Potentials evoked by sound in the auditory cortex of the cat. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 1961; 200: 1219–1225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, J.W. 1992. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses, (First ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto I., Mashiko T., Yoshikawa K., Mizuta T., Imada T., et al. Neuromagnetic measurements of the human primary auditory response. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1995; 96: 348–356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins D.B., Walden B.E., Montgomery A., Prosek R.A. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 162–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P. Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. J Neurophysiol 1997a; 77(5)2616–2641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P. Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. II. Response strength. J Neurophysiol 1997b; 77(5)2642–2660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P., Irvine D. First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 1997; 78(5)2438–2454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P., Rajan R., Irvine D.R. Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 1994; 76(1–2)188–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendler T., Squires N.K., Moore J.K., Coyle P.K. Auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Basic Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 1996; 7(3)245–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood L.J. Estimating auditory function with auditory evoked potentials. The Hearing Journal 1995; 48(10)10, 32–42
   Google Scholar
• Huynh H., Feldt L.S. Conditions under which the mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1970; 65: 1582–1589
   Google Scholar
• Hyde M.L. The slow vertex potential: Properties and clinical applications. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994; 179–218
   Google Scholar
• Kaga M., Kon K., Uno A., Horiguchi T., Yoneyama H., et al. Auditory perception in auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with auditory verbal agnosia. Brain Development 2002; 24(3)197–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh K.T., Domico W.D., Crews P.L., McCormick V.A. Comparison of the intrasubject repeatability of auditory brain stem and middle latency response elicited in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97(3)264–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh K.T., Harker L.A., Tyler R.S. Auditory brainstem and middle latency response. I. Effects of response filtering and waveform identification. II. threshold responses to a 500-Hz tone pip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Supplement 103) 1984; 93: 2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T. Clinical applications of the middle latency response. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 130–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T., Stein L. The auditory middle latency response. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994; 155–178
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Özdamar Ö., Stein L., Reed N. Absent auditory brainstem response: Peripheral hearing loss or brainstem dysfunction?. Laryngoscope 1984; 94: 400–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Smith D.I., Reed N.L., Stein L.K., Cartee C. Auditory middle latency responses in children: effects of age and diagnostic category. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1985; 62: 343–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuriki S., Nogai T., Hirata Y. Cortical sources of middle latency responses of auditory evoked magnetic field. Hear Res 1995; 92: 47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukli E., Fjermedal O., Mair I.W.S. Low-frequency auditory brainstem response threshold. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 171–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J.S.M., McPherson B., Yuen K.C.P., Wong L.L.N. Screening for auditory neurophathy in a school for hearing impaired children. International Journal Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2001; 61: 39–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legatt A.D., Arezzo J.C., Vaughan H.G. The anatomic and physiologic bases of brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Neurol Clin 1988; 6: 681–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein V., Stapells D.R. Frequency-specific identification of hearing loss using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to clicks and tones. Hear Res 1996; 98(1–2)125–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood A., Salvi R., Coad M., Arnold S., Wack D., et al. The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: Responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9(1)65–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madell J., Goldstein R. Relation between loudness and the amplitude of the early components of the averaged electroencephalic response. Journal of Speech and Hear Res 1972; 15: 131–141
   Google Scholar
• McFarland W.H., Vivion M.C., Goldstein R. Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of Speech and Hear Res 1977; 20: 781–798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee T., Kraus N. Auditory development reflected by the middle latency response. Ear Hear 1996; 17(5)419–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melcher J., Guinan J., Knudson I., Kiang N. Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. II. Correlating lesion sites with waveform changes. Hear Res 1996; 93: 28–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller A.R. Neural generators of auditory evoked potentials. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994; 23–46
   Google Scholar
• Munnerley G.M., Greville K.A., Purdy S.C., Keith W.J. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses-relationship to behavioural thresholds in cochlear-impaired adults. Audiology 1991; 30: 25–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Geurkink N.A. Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 236–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nousak J.M., Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the auditory brain stem response to bone-conducted tones in infants and adults. Ear Hear 1992; 13(2)87–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P., Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones: I. High-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1997a; 102: 3597–3608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P., Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones: II. Derived response analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 1997b; 102: 3609–3619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen G.A., Burkard R. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain–stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1760–1767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö., Kraus N. Auditory middle-latency responses in humans. Audiology 1983; 22: 34–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R. 1995. Neural signal processing. In. B. C. J. Moore, (Ed.),Hearing, (, pp., 75–121. ). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P. Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: Neural correlates. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82(1)1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P. Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking. Behavioral Brain Research 1990; 37: 197–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Burkard R. Response magnitude and timing of auditory response initiation in the inferior colliculus of the awake chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(5)2731–2737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Cynader M.S. Some neural mechanisms in the cat's auditory cortex underlying sensitivity to combined tone and wide-spectrum noise stimuli. Hear Res 1985; 18: 87–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T., Alain C., Woods D., John M., Scherg M., et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory–evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 64–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Ouellette J., Hamel G., Smith A.D. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 1979; 8: 289–314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdy S.C., Kelly A.S., Davies M.G. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13(7)367–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qui C., Salvi R., Ding D., Burkard R. Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitude in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain. Hear Res 2000; 139: 153–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees A., Palmer A.R. Rate-intensity functions and their modification by broadband noise for neurons in the guinea pig inferior colliculus. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1488–1498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode W.S., Greenberg S. Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71(2)493–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. Physiology of the auditory nerve. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay. Springer-Verlag, New York 1992; 3493
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. Cochlear delays and traveling waves: Comments on ‘Experimental look at cochlear mechanics’ [A. Dancer, Audiology 1992; 31:301–312]. Audiology 1994; 33: 131–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Robles L., Rich N.C. Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. J Neurophysiol 1992; 68(4)187–1099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvi, R., Henderson, D., & Hamernik, R. 1983. Physiological bases of sensorineural hearing loss. In. J. V. Tobias & E. D. Schubert, (Eds.), Hear Res and Theory, (, Vol. 2, pp., 173–231. ). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders J.C., Cohen Y.E., Szymko Y.M. The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: A five year update. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 136–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M., Volk S.A. Frequency specificity of simultaneously recorded early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1983; 56: 443–452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Abdala C., Cone-Wesson B. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1997; 104(1–2)27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R.L. Adaptation, saturation and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 166–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Studies in evoked potential audiometry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa. 1984
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Frequency-specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification: Proceedings of an International, R.C. Seewald. Phonak AG, Conference Basel 2000a; 13–31
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked ABR: A literature meta-analysis. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 2000b; 24(2)74–83
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Durieux-Smith A., Picton T.W. Electrophysiologic measures of frequency-specific auditory function. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials2nd ed, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Galambos R., Costello J.A., Makeig S. Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1988; 71: 289–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Gravel J.S., Martin B.A. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 361–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W. Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear Hear 1981; 2(1)20–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A. Evoked potential audiometry: An evaluation of eight techniques. ASHA 1984b; 26(10)75
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Edwards C.G., Moran L.M. Thresholds for short-latency auditory evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology 1990; 29: 262–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y.S., Hood L.J., Berlin C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; 119: 741–753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki J.-I., Kodera K., Yamada O. Brainstem response audiometry in newborns and hearing-impaired infants. Sensory Evoked Potentials. I. An International Conference on Standards for Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Testing, A. Starr, C. Rosenberg, M. Don, H. Davis. CRS Amplifon, Milan 1984; 85–93
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T., Hirabayashi M., Kobayashi K. Effects of analog and digital filtering on auditory middle latency response in adults and young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93(3)267–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T., Hirai Y., Horiuchi K. Simultaneous recording of the early and middle components of auditory electric response. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 276–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T., Horiuchi K. Effect of high-pass filter on auditory brain stem responses to tone pips. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 123–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Syka J., Rybalko N., Popelar J. Enhancement of the auditory cortex evoked responses in awake guinea pigs after noise exposure. Hear Res 1994; 78(2)158–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R.D., Mendel M.I., Anderson C.V. Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on the middle components of the averaged auditory electroencephalic response. Journal of Speech and Hear Res 1977; 20: 81–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tlumak A.I. Electrophysiological responses in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Seminars in Hearing 2002; 23(3)183–191
   Google Scholar
• Versino M., Bergamaschi R., Romani A., Banfi P., Callieco R., et al. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials improve the detection of abnormalities along auditory pathways in multiple sclerosis patients. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1992; 84(3)296–299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J., Ding D., Salvi R.J. Functional reorganization in chinchilla inferior colliculus associated with chronic and acute cochlear damage. Hear Res 2002; 168: 238–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J., Salvi R.J., Powers N. Plasticity of response properties of inferior colliculus neurons following acute cochlear damage. J Neurophysiol 1996; 75(1)171–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting K.A., Martin B.A., Stapells D.R. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear 1998; 19(3)218–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C.-Y., Stapells D.R. Pure-tone masking profiles for human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to 500-Hz tones. Hear Res 1994; 78: 169–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-Y.,& Stapells, D.R., (submitted). Detection of auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to clicks and brief tones by experienced human observers.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada O., Kodera K., Yagi T. Cochlear processes affecting wave V latency of the auditory evoked brainstem response: A study of patients with sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 67–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamada O., Yamane H., Kodera K. Simultaneous recordings of the brain stem. response and the frequency-following response. Otolaryngol 1977; 6: 90–118
   Google Scholar