Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: A pilot study

References

• Angelocci A.A., Kopp G.A., Holbrook A. The vowel formants of deaf and normal-hearing eleven-to fouteen year old boys. J Speech Hear Disord 1964; 29: 156–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baken R.J., Orlikoff R.F. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Singular Publishing group, Inc, San Diego 2000; 393–421
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G.V., Pastorelli C. Multifaceted impact of self–efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development 1996; 67: 206–1222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bzoch K.R. Measurements and assessments of categorial aspects of cleft palate laguage, voice and speech disorders. Communication disorders related to cleft Lip and Palate, K.R. Bzoch. College–Hill press, Boston 1989
   Google Scholar
• Chin B.S., Kirk K.I. Consonant Feature Production by Children with Multichannel Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids and Tactile Aids. Cochlear Implants, Waltzam, Cohen. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., New York 2000; 309–310
   Google Scholar
• Colton R.H., Cooker H.S. Percieved nasality in the speech of the deaf. J Speech Hear Res 1968; 11: 553–559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson P.W., Blamey P.J., Dettman S.J., Rowland L.C., Barker E.J., et al. A clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995; 16(6)551–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bodt M., Wuyts F., Van de Heyning P., Croux C. Test-Retest Study of the GRBAS Scale: the influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997; 11: 74–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bodt M.S., Hernandez-Diaz Huici M., Van de Heyning P. Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord 2002; 35: 283–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. 1998. Motivation to succeed. In: N. Eisenberg, (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology(3:1051–1075). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fey M. Clinical Forum: Phonological assessment and treatment. Articulation and phonology: an introduction. Language. Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1992; 2: 224–232
   Google Scholar
• Foy, R. 1910. Contribution rhinométrique à l’étude de la respiration nasale. Anals des maladies de l'oreille, du larynx, du nez et du pharynx. T. XXXVI, 130–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fugain C., Chabolle F., Meyer B., Chouard C.H. Clinical results of the multielectrode cochleair implant in the rehabilitation of 27 cases of acquired total deafness. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1988; 105: 253–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Tyler R.S., Woodworth G. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant in postlingually deaf adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104(Supp. 166)268–269
   Google Scholar
• Geers A.E., Brenner C. Speech perception results: audition and lipreading enhancement. The Volta Review 1994; 96: 97–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers A.E., Tobey E.A. Effects of sensory aids on the development of speech production skills in children with profound hearing impairment. The Volta Review 1992; 94: 135–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert H.R., Campbell M.I. Speaking fundamental frequency in three groups of hearing-impaired individuals. J Commun Disord 1980; 13(3)195–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunwell P. Natural phonology. The New Phonologies: development in clinical linguistics, MJ Ball, RD Kent. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Springer verlag, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B.W., Paden E.P. Phonological processes which characterize unintelligible and intelligible speech speech in early childhood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1983; 46: 369–373
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman P. Clinical Forum: Phonological assessment and treatment. Synergistic development of phonetic skill. Language. Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1992; 23: 254–260
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C.V., Numbers F.C. An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Genet Psychol Monogr 1942; 25: 289–392
   Google Scholar
• Ingram D. Procedures for the phonological analysis of children's language. University Park Press, Baltimore 1982
   Google Scholar
• International Phonetic Association. 1949. The principles of the International Phonetic Association. London, IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R.D., Read C. The acoustic analysis of speech. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1996
   Google Scholar
• Kirk K.I, Hill-Brown C. Speech and language results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 36S–47S
   Google Scholar
• Lapine P.R., Stewart M., Tatchell J.A. Application of nasometry to speech samples of hearing-impaired children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991; 73: 467–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder S.B., Spitzer J.B. Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf males cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987; 82: 843–846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder S.B., Spitzer J.B. A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf males. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhle E., Frischmuth S., Holm M., Becker L., Flamm K., et al. Speech recognition, speech production and speech intelligibility in children with hearing aids versus implanted children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 1999; 47: 165–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R.T., Kirk K.I., Robbins A.M., Todd S., Riley A. Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol 1996; 116(2)240–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R.T., Svirsky M., Kirk K.I., Robbins A.M., Todd S., et al. Speech Intelligibility of Children with Multichannel Cochlear mplants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 35–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monini S., Banci G., Barbara M., Argiro M.T., Filipo R. Clarion cochlear implant: short-term effects on voice parameters. Am J Otol 1997; 18(6)719–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen R.B., Engebretson A.M., Vemula N.R. Some effects of deafness on the generation of voice. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66(6)1680–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norris J., Damico J. Whole language in theory and practice: implication for language intervention. Language Speech Hearing Services School 1990; 21: 212–220
   Google Scholar
• Osberger, M.J. 1990. Effect of age at onset of deafness on speech production before and after cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am, 86: S129 (A).
   Google Scholar
• Osberger M.J., Maso M., Sam L.K. Speech Intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids or hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 186–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osberger M.J., McGarr N. Speech Production Characteristics of the Hearing Impaired. Speech and Language: advances in basic research and practise. Academic Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Osberger M.J., Robbins A.M., Berry S.W., Todd S.L., Hesketh L.J., et al. Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 151–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parkin L., Dankowski K. Speech performance by patient with multichannel cochleair implant. Otolaryngology 1986; 95: 205–209
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Brooks, A., Hegde, M.N. Assessment and treatment of articualtion and phonological disorders in children”. Texas, Pro-Ed. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Perrin E., Berger-Vachon C., Topouzkhanian A., Truy E., Morgon A. Valuation of cochlear implanted children's voices. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 15: 181–186
   Google Scholar
• Raes J., Wuyts F.L., De Bodt M., Clement P. The dysphonia severity Index used with a percentage scale. Stem-. spraak- en taalpathologie 2002; 1: 30–38
   Google Scholar
• Seifert E., Oswald M., Bruns U., Vischer M., Kompis M., et al. Changes of voice and articulation in children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 11: 115
   Google Scholar
• Serry T.A., Blamey P.J. A 4-year investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42(1)141–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shprintzen J.R., Bardach J. Cleft palate speech management, a multidisciplinary approach. St. Louis, Mosby 1995
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Moeller M.P. The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 556–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens K.N., Nickerson R.S., Boothroyd A., Rollins A.M. Assesment of nasalization in the speech of deaf children. J Speech Hear Res 1976; 19: 393–416
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky M.A. Speech Intelligibility of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users and Hearing Aid Users. Cochlear Implants, Waltzman, Cohen. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York 2000; 312–314
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky M.A., Chin S.B. Speech production. Cochleair Implantso, V. Waltzman, V. Cohen. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York 2000; 293–313
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky M.A., Jones D., Osberger M.J., Miyamoto R.T. The effect of auditory feedback on the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1998; 19(5)385–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szyfter W., Pruszewicz A., Woznica B., Swidzinski P., Szymiec E., et al. The acoustic analysis of voice in patients with multi-channel cochlear implant. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996; 117(3)225–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobey E.A., Geers A., Brenner C. Speech production results: speech feature acquisition. The Volta Review 1994; 96(5)109–129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey E.A., Hasenstab S. Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 48S–54S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobey E.A., Pancamo S., Staller S.J., Brimacombe J.A., Beiter A.L. Consonant production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1991; 12(1)23–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost-Cardamone J.E. Speech: anatomy, physiology and pathology. Cleft lip and palate, a system of management, D.A. kernahan, S.W. Rosenstein. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1990
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Kirk K.I. Vowel and diphthong production by young users of cochlear implants and the relationship between the phonetic level evaluation and spontaneous speech. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36(3)488–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Spencer L., Woodworth G.G. Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38(2)327–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uchanski R.M., Geers A.E. Acoustic Characteristics of the Speech of Young Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison with Normal-Hearing Age-Mates. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 90S–105S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Borsel J. Articulation in Down's syndrome adolescents and adults. European Journal of disorders of communication 1996; 31: 415–444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Weijer J., Slis I. Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer. Logopedie en Foniatrie 1991; 63: 97–101
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broecke M. Frequenties van letters, lettergrepen, woorden en fonemen in het Nederlands. Ter sprake: spraak als betekenisvol geluid in 36 thematische hoofdstukken, M. Van Den Broecke. PWT, Utrecht 1988
   Google Scholar
• Van Lierde, K.M., De Bodt, M., Wuyts, F.L., & Van Cauwenberge, P. 2003. Age-related patterns of nasalance in normal Flemish children and young adults. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 37:344–350, 2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde K.M., Wuyts F.L., De Bodt M., Van Cauwenberge P. Nasometric values for normal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate- Craniofacial J 2001; 38: 112–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson E.K. Voice problems of children2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wuyts, F., De Bodt, M., Bruckers, L., Molenberghs, G., & Belgian Study group on Voice disorders. 1996. Results of the Research work of the Belgian Study group on voice disorders. 50:25–329.
   Google Scholar
• Wuyts F., De Bodt M., Molenberghs G., Remacle M., Heylen L., et al. The Dysphonia Severity Index: An Objective Measure of Vocal Quality Based on a Multiparameter Approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43(6)796–809
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yorkston K.M., Strand E.A., Kennedy M.R.T. Comprehensibility of dysarthric speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1996; 5(1)55–56
   Google Scholar