The effect of impulse noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions

References

• Attias J., Bresloff I., Reshef I., Horowitz G., Furman V. Evaluating noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 39–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balatsouras D. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with disortion product otoacoustic emissions. Med. Sci Monit 2004; 10: CR218–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A.M., Kemp D.T. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A.M., McDowell B., Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark W.W. Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 155–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Evans B.N. High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. Science 1995; 267: 2006–2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Morgan C.T., Hawkins J.E., Galambos R., Smith F.W. Temporary deafness following exposure to loud tones and noise. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1950; 88: 1–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis B., Qiu W., Hamernik R.P. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas. Hear Res 2004; 187: 12–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddins A.C., Zuskov M., Salvi R.J. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear Res 1999; 127: 119–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel R., Freeman S., Sohmer H. Use of ABR threshold and OAEs in detection of noise induced hearing loss. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2003; 14: 95–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Bergman B.M., Beauchaine K.L., Kaminski J.R., et al. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R.P., Ahroon W.A., Hsueh KH. The energy spectrum of an impulse: Its relation to hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 197–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R.P., Turrentine G., Roberto M., Salvi R., Henderson D. Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea. Hear Res 1984; 13: 229–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter P., Ding D., Powers N., Salvi R.J. Quantitative relationship of carboplatin dose to magnitude of inner ear and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear Res 1997; 112: 199–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone S.W., Norman G., Keogh I., Kelly V. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128: 257–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz M.A., Probst R., Harris F.P., Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 478–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu W.C., Wu H.P., Liu T.C. Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noiseinduced hearing loss using steady-state evoked potentials. Clin Otolaryngol 2003; 28: 195–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopka W., Zalewski P., Pietkiewicz P. Evaluation of transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions before and after shooting practice. Noise Health 2001; 3: 29–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J., Marshall L., Heller L.M. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 307–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePage, E.L. & Murray, N.M. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. 1998. Med J Aust, 169, 588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebel J., Delb W., Andes C., Koch A. Measurement of noise effects in a discotheque by means of otoacoustic emissions. Laryngo Rhino Otologie 1996; 75: 259–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim D.J. Functional structure of the organ of Corti: A review. Hear Res 1986; 22: 117–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Probst R., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in the rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28: 173–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Heller L.M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 1319–1334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Scheinin S.A., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in the rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick W. Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 147–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensh B.D., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1993; 70: 65–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadol J.B., Jr. Comparative anatomy of the cochlea and auditory nerve in mammals. Hear Res 1988; 34: 253–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 1998. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational noise exposure. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 98–126. CincinnatiOH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Noise health hazard evaluation report: HETA #2002-0131-2898. Fort Collins Police Services. Fort Collins, Colorado. March 2003. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 2003
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. CPL 2-2.35A-29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1). Guidelines for noise enforcement;Appendix A. U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA, Washington DC 1983
   Google Scholar
• Plinkert P.K., Hemmert W., Wagner W., Just K., Zenner H.P. Monitoring noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 367–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasher D., Sulkowski W. The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Envir Health 1999; 12: 183–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price G.R., Kalb J.T. Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 219–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price G.R., Kim H.N., Lim D.J., Dunn D. Hazard from weapons impulses: histological and electrophysiological evidence. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 1245–1254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puria S., Rosowski J.J. Measurements of reverse transmission in the human middle ear: Preliminary results. Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, E.R. Lewis, G.R. Long, R.F. Lyon, P.M. Narins, C.R. Steele, E. Hecht-Poinar. World Scientific, Singapore 1996; 151–157
   Google Scholar
• Quaranta A., Portalatini P., Henderson D. Temporary and permanent threshold shift: An overview. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 48: 75–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robles L., Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input–output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80: 1364–1374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedt R.A. Acoustic distortion products in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1481–1490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellick P.M., Patuzzi R., Johnstone B.M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 131–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C.A., Guinan J.J., Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105((2 Pt 1))782–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M., Konkle D.F., Simpson T.H. The effect of recreational gunfire noise on hearing in workers exposed to occupational noise. Ear Nose Throat J 2001; 80: 32–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stover L., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Montoya D. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 956–967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton L.A., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Whitehead M.L. Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal overexposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75: 161–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Piskorski P. Modeling otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structures in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1517–1543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein P., Hofstetter P., Wang J., Salvi R., Nostrant A. Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 96: 71–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck B.M., Van Cauwenberge P.B., Leroy L., Corthals P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology 1999; 38: 44–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos J. On the annoyance caused by impulse sounds produced by small, medium-large, and large firearms. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 244–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, W.A. 2000. Fundamentals of Hearing: An introduction. (4th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press, pp., 253–259.
   Google Scholar