Frequency-specific objective audiometry: Tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli

References

• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G., Ming W.J. The auditory steady-state response: comparison with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 173–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S.K. A slow brain stem response for low-frequency audiometry. Audiology 1979; 18: 445–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Elberling C., Waring M. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 219–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13(3)187–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.A.S., Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 87–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Picton T.W., Stapells D.R. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112(4)1569–1581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Worthington D.W., Reiland J.K., Beauchaine K.A., Goldgar D.E. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Picton T.W. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 125–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 94: 26–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 1996; 101: 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethe -J., Von-Specht H., Muhler R., Hocke T. Amplitude modulation following responses in awake and sleeping humans–a comparison for 40 Hz and 80 Hz modulation frequency. Scand Audiol (Suppl.) 2001; 52: 152–155
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Ouellette J., Hamel G., Smith A.D. Brainstem evoked potentials to tone pips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 1979; 8: 289–314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdy S.C., Houghton J.M., Keith W.J., Greville K.A. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults. Audiology 1989; 28: 82–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani G.L., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L., Brenner D. Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the Neuromagnetic Method. Exp Brain Res 1982; 47: 381–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinninger Y.S. Auditory brain stem response for objective measures of hearing. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 23–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Abdala C., Cone-Wesson B. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response. Hearing Research 1997; 104: 27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Frequency-specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A sound foundation through early amplification, R. Seewald, 2000a; 13–31
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: a literature meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2000b; 24(2)74–83
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W. Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 20–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Gravel J.S., Martin B.A. Thresholds for auditory brainstem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 361–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A. Electrophysiologic measures of frequency-specific auditory function. Principles and applications in auditory evoked potentials, J.T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Hill, Mass. 1994; 251–283
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Edwards C.G., Moran L.M. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Audiology 1990; 29: 262–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M., Pschirrer U. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology 2001; 40: 63–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J.F.C., Brocaar M.P., Van Zanten G.A. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1987; 26: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Reijden C.S., Mens L.H.M., Snik A.F.M. Signal to noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 692–701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Werff K.R., Brown C.J., Gienapp B.A., Schmidt Clay K.M. Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 227–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar