References
- Cook J.A., Bacon S.P., Sammeth C.A. Effect of low-frequency gain reduction on speech recognition and its relation to upward spread of masking. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 410–422
- Dillon H. Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response time. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 287–307
- Fabry D.A., Leek M.R., Walden B.E., Cord M. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce'upward spread' of masking?. J Rehab Res 1993; 30: 318–325
- Goedegebure A., Hulshof M., Verschuure J., Dreschler W.A. Effects of Single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 2001; 40: 10–25
- Goedegebure A., Goedegebure-Hulshof M., Verschuure J., Dreschler W.A. The effects of phonemic compression and anti-upward-spread-of-masking (anti-USOM) on the perception of articulatory features in hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 414–428
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 93–104
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Alcantara J.I., Launer S., Kuehnel V. Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow band noise. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 365–374
- Moore B.C.J., Peters R.W., Stone M.A. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 400–411
- Plomp R. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multi-channel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 83: 2322–2327
- Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
- Rankovic C.M., Freyman R.L., Zurek P.M. Potential benefits of adaptive frequency-gain characteristics for speech perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 354–362
- Steeneken, H.J.M., Geurtsen, F.W.M., &. Agterhuis, E. 1990. Speech data-base for intelligibility and speech quality measurements. TNO-Institute for Perception: Soesterberg.
- Summers V., Leek M.R. Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 2866–2876
- Turner C.W., Souza P.E., Forget L.N. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 2568–76
- Van Buuren R.A., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 211–221
- Van Dijkhuizen J.N., Festen J.M., Plomp R. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 621–628
- Verschuure J., Benning F.J., van Cappellen M., Dreschler W.A., Boermans P.P. Speech intelligibility in noise with fast compression hearing aids. Audiology 1998; 37: 127–150
- Verschuure J., Maas A.J.J., Stikvoort E., de Jong R.M., Goedegebure A., et al. Compression and its effect on the speech signal. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 162–175
- Villchur E. Comments on “The negative effect of amplitude compression in multi-channel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function”. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 425–427
- Yund E.W., Buckles K.M. Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1224–1239