Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: Evaluation in an empirical design

References

• Alain C., Woods D.L., Covarrubias D. Activation of duration sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 531–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alberti P.W., Hyde M.L., Riko K., Corbin H., Abramovich S. An evaluation of BERA for hearing screening in high-risk neonates. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1115–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1996. American National Standards Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-1996. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Annet A.M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970; 61(3)303–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80 Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1994; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Suzuki Y., Yokota M., Furuse H., Watanabe T., et al. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neuro-otol 1999; 4: 28–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R., Jerger J.J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1959; 4: 330–45
   Google Scholar
• Coles R.R.A., Mason S. The results of cortical electric response audiometry in medico-legal investigations. Br J Audiol 1984; 18: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Parker J., Swiderski N., Rickards F. The auditory steady-state response: full term and premature neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 260–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Wunderlich J. Auditory evoked potentials from the cortex: audiology applications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11(5)372–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S. K., Shelnutt J., Bowers C. Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA). J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10(4)717–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John S., Van Roon P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M., Elberling C. Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual background noise in the decision to stop averaging. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 13: 491–499
   Google Scholar
• Durieux-Smith A., Jacobson J.T. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral screening in neonates. J Otolaryngol 1985; 14: 47–52
   Google Scholar
• Durieux-Smith A., Picton T.W., Bernard P., MacMurray B., Goodman J.T. Prognostic validity of brainstem electric response audiometry infants of a neonatal intensive care unit. Audiology 1991; 30: 249–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant J.D. Simulated hearing loss via masking: Research and heuristic applications. Sem Hear 2004; 25: 25–37
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara M., Gennaro L.D., Ferlazzo F., Curcio G., Barattucci M., et al. Auditory evoked responses upon awakening from sleep in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters 2001; 310(2–3)145–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S., Scharf B., Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 646–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass G.V., Hopkins K.D. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (3rd edition). Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 1996; 369
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.A., Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 3: 87–97
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins J.E., Steven S.S. The masking pure tone and speech by white noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1950; 22: 6–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 237–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone S.W., Norman G., Keogh I., Kelly V. . The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128(2)257–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L.E. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33(1)3–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde M.L. Statistical inference in electric response audiometry. Disorders of auditory function II, S.D.G. Stephens, 1976; 145–161
   Google Scholar
• Hyde M.L., Alberti P.W., Matsumoto N., Li Y. Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 514–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 555–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Picton T.W. MASTER: a windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comp Methods Prog Biomed 2000; 61: 125–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Duriex-Smith A, Campagne S.C, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear and Hear 1996; 17(2)81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandless G.A. Clinical application of evoked response audiometry. J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10(3)486–78
   Google Scholar
• Ménard M, Gallego S., Truy E., Berger-Vachon C., Durrant J.D., et al. Auditory steady-state response evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients. Int J Audiol 2004; 43(Suppl. 1)S39–43
   Google Scholar
• Onishi S., Davis H. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 582–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhammel P.A., Davis H., Weir C., Hirsh S. Adult auditory evoked vertex potentials in sleep. Audiology 1973; 12: 116–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D.L., Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age, the audiogram and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1788–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., et al. Steady state response to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear and Hear 2001; 22(3)200–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Moran L. Recording auditory brainstem responses from infants. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngology 1994; 28: 93–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., Whittingham J., Moran L.M., et al. Objective Evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 315–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G., Dowell R.C., Rickards F.W., Beer D.E., Clark G.M. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click evoked auditory brainstem response. Ear and Hear 1998; 19: 48–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 236–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers M.S., Humes L.E. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93(5)2903–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Auditory brainstem response assessment of infants and children. Sem Hear 1989; 10: 229–51
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: A literature meta-analysis. J Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology 2000; 24: 74–83
   Google Scholar