424
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction

Resultado auto-reportado en nuevos usuarios de auxiliares auditivos: Tendencia longitudinal y relaciones entre mediciones subjetivas de beneficio y satisfacción

Pages 382-392 | Received 08 Mar 2006, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • AERA. 1999. American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
  • Arlinger S. Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation?. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 97S–99S
  • Arlinger S., Gatehouse S., Bentler R.A., Byrne D., Cox R.M., et al. Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 87S–98S
  • Bentler R.A., Niebuhr D.P., Getta J.P., Anderson C.V. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993a; 36: 808–819
  • Bentler R.A., Niebuhr D.P., Getta J.P., Anderson C.V. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993b; 36: 820–831
  • Cox, R.M. (ed.). 2000. Proceedings of a workshop on self-reported outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation including hearing aids. Eriksholm. Denmark, September 1–3, 1999. Ear Hear, 21(4 Suppl), 1S–115S.
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G. & Gray G. 2004. Hearing aid fitting: self-report outcomes over six months. Paper presented at American Auditory Society 2004 Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, March 7–9.
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 131–41
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 306–320
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 151–160
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 30–35
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Taylor I.M., Gray G.A. Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 428–441
  • Cox R.M., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H., et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 106S–115S
  • Cox R.M., Stephens D., Kramer S.E. Translations of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 3–26
  • Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334
  • Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1258–1268
  • Gatehouse S. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 296–306
  • Gatehouse S. Aspects of auditory ecology and psychoacoustic function as determinants of benefits from, and candidature for non-linear processing in, hearing aids. Auditory Models and Non-Linear Hearing Instruments, A.N. Rasmussen, P.A. Osterhammel, T. Andersen, T. Poulsen. Holmens Trykkeri, Denmark 1999a; 221–233
  • Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1999b; 10: 80–103
  • Gatehouse S. Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: Some uses, users and options. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 91–110
  • Gatehouse S., Elberling C. & Naylor G. (2000). Aspects of auditory ecology and pyschoacoustic function as determinants of benefits from, and candidature for non-linear processing in, hearing aids. Paper presented at IHCON, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA.
  • Horwitz A.R., Turner C.W. The time course of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 1–11
  • Humes L.E. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 26–39
  • Humes L.E., Garner C.B., Wilson D.L., Barlow N.N. Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 469–486
  • Humes L.E., Wilson D.L. An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a three-year period of hearing-aid use. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46: 137–145
  • Kaiser H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958; 23: 187–200
  • Kaiser H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 141–151
  • Kapteyn T.S. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. I: An analysis of technical information. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 147–156
  • Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschler W.A., Boymans M., Festen J.M. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 36–41
  • Kuk F.K., Potts L., Valente M., Lee L., Picirrillo J. Evidence of acclimatization in persons with severe-to-profound hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 84–99
  • Mulrow C.D., Tuley M.R., Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1402–1405
  • Munro K.J., Lutman M.E. The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 484–495
  • Munro K.J., Lutman M.E. Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 555–562
  • Palmer C.V., Nelson C.T., Lindley G.A. The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1705–1721
  • Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992
  • Saunders G.H., Cienkowski K.M. Acclimatization to hearing aids. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 129–139
  • Stephens D. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the client-oriented scale of improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 42–47
  • Surr R.K., Cord M.T., Walden B.E. Long-term versus short-term hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 165–171
  • Taylor K.S. Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 390–394
  • Turner C.W., Humes L.E., Bentler R.A., Cox R.M. A review of the literature on hearing aid benefit as a function of time. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 14S–28S
  • Vestergaard M.D. 2004. Benefit from amplification of high frequencies in hearing impaired: aspects of cochlear dead regions and auditory acclimatization. PhD thesis. Lyngby: The Technical University of Denmark, Acoustic Technology.
  • Watson N.A., Knudsen V.O. Selective amplification in hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1940; 11: 406–419
  • Wong L.L., Hickson L., McPherson B. Hearing aid satisfaction: What does research from the past 20 years say?. Trends Amplif 2003; 7: 117–161
  • Wong L.L.N., Hickson L. & McPherson B. 2004. Hearing aid satisfaction and its relationship to expectation, performance, benefit and disconfirmation. Paper presented at American Auditory Society 2004 Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, March 7–9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.