References
- Bardach J., Hurwitz D.J. Pediatric plastic and reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Pediatric Otolaryngology3rd ed, C.D. Bluestone, S.E. Stool, M.A. Kenna. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia 1983; 1: 805–830
- Brummer S.B., Turner M.J. Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1977; 24: 59–63
- Carter P. Determining electrode faults using different stimulation modes. Cochlear implants: Proceedings of the XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, G.M. Clark. Monduzzi editore, Bologna 1997; 69–73
- Clark G.M., Shute S.A., Shepherd R.K., Carter T.D. Cochlear implantation: Osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 40–42
- Gaddes L.A. Historical evolution of circuit models for the electrode-electrolyte interface. Ann Biomed Eng 1997; 25: 1–14
- Henkin Y., Kaplan-Neeman R., Muchnik C., Kronenberg J., Hildesheimer M. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67: 873–880
- Hughes M.L., Van der Werff K.R., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Kelsay D.M., et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioural measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 471–486
- Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., Raine C.H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118: 313–326
- Li L., Parkins C.W., Webster D.B. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?. Hear Res 1999; 133: 27–39
- Linares H.A., Kischer C.W., Dobrkovsky M., Larson D.L. The histiotypic organization of the hypertrophic scar in humans. J Invest Dermatol 1972; 59: 323–331
- Ni D., Shepherd R.K., Seldon H.L., Xu S.A., Clark G.M., et al. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens. Hear Res 1992; 62: 63–81
- Parkinson A.J., Arcaroli J., Staller S.J., Arndt P.L., Cosgriff A., et al. The Nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: Adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 41S–48S
- Peeters S., Van Immerseel L., Zarowski A., Houben V., Govaerts P., et al. New developments in cochlear implants. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52: 115–127
- Pfingst B.E. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1990; 50: 225–236
- Swanson B., Seligman P., Carter P. Impedance measurement of the Nucleus 22-electrode array in patients. Ann Oto Rhino Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 141–144
- Tykocinski M., Duan Y., Tabor B., Cowan R.S. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes. Hear Res 2001; 159: 53–68
- Walsh S.M., Leake-Jones P.A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results. Hear Res 1982; 7: 281–304