Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms

References

• Baer T., Moore B.C., Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett D.S., Byers V.W. Increased intelligibility in the hypacusic by slow-play frequency transposition. J Aud Res 1967; 7: 107–118
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. Internal report RCI 10, Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R., Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 37–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2108–2120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniloff R.G., Shriner T.H., Zemlin W.R. Intelligibility of vowels altered in duration and frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 700–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Penn W., Ross M. Pediatric experiences with frequency transposing. Hearing Instruments 1993; 44: 26–32
   Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2570–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg Y., Tamhane A.C. Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, Hobeken, NJ 1987
   Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 432–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson B. A new coding amplifier system for the severely hard of hearing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Acoustics. Stuttgart, 1959 1961; 2: 655–657
   Google Scholar
• Ling D. Three experiments on frequency transposition. American Annals of the Deaf 1968; 113: 283–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Dean M.R. Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: Effects of frequency transposition. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 353–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Dorkos V.P., Dean M.R., Ching T.Y. Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1323–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Knight M.R. Preliminary results with the AVR ImpaCt frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 121–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcantara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Aud Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Murray N., Byrne D. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with various high frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986; 8: 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Neary T. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 2088–2113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent T.C., Chmiel R., Jerger J. Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 67–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson G.E., Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 27: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 391–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed C.M., Hicks B.L., Braida L.D., Durlach N.I. Discrimination of speech processed by low-pass filtering and pitch-invariant frequency lowering. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 409–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed C.M., Schultz K.I., Braida L.D., Durlach N.I. Discrimination and identification of frequency-lowered speech in listeners with high-frequency hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 2139–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenhouse J. A new transposition device for the deaf. The Hearing Journal 1990; 43: 20–25
   Google Scholar
• Simpson A., Hersbach A.A., McDermott H.J. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency-compression hearing device. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 281–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. Low-frequency hearing loss: Perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Hurtig R.R. Proportional frequency-compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 877–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmans M. The design of speech recoding devices for the deaf. Br J Audiol 1974; 8: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Velmans M., Marcuson M. The acceptability of spectrum-preserving and spectrum-destroying transposition to severely hearing-impaired listeners. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 17–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Baer T., Moore B.C.J. Effects of lowpass filtering on speech intelligibility for listeners with dead regions at high frequencies. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 148–149
   Google Scholar
• Zakis J.A., McDermott H.J., Fisher M. An advanced sound processing system for hearing aid research. Iran J Audiol 2004; 3: 75–78
   Google Scholar