107
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials

Comparación intra y post-operatoria de los potenciales compuestos de acción adquiridos y evocados eléctricamente

, &
Pages 589-594 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Shallop J.K., Firszt J.B., Hughes M.L., et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45–59
  • Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., et al. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults [see comments]. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 151–163
  • Cafarelli D.D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., von W.E., van D.B., et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 105–116
  • Dillier N., Lai W.K., Almqvist B., Frohne C., Muller-Deile J., et al. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111: 407–414
  • Hughes M.L., Van der Werff K.R., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Kelsay D.M., et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioural measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 471–486
  • Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., Raine C.H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118: 313–326
  • Killian M.J., Klis S.F., Smoorenburg G.F. Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VIIIth nerve to electric stimulation. Hear Res 1994; 81: 66–82
  • Lai W.K., Aksit M., Akdas F., Dillier N. Longitudinal behaviour of neural response telemetry (NRT) data and clinical implications. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 252–263
  • Lai W.K., Dillier N., Laszig R., Fisch U. Results from a pilot study using the Nucleus CI24M/SP5 cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1997; 18(Suppl)S35–S36
  • Li L., Parkins C.W., Webster D.B. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?. Hear Res 1999; 133: 27–39
  • Pfingst B.E. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1990; 50: 225–236
  • Seyle K., Brown C.J. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear 2002; 23(Suppl)72S–79S
  • Smoorenburg G.F., Willeboer C., van Dijk J.E. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users, with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol 2002; 7: 335–347
  • Thai-Van H., Chanal J.M., Coudert C., Veuillet E., Truy E., et al. Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: Preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 58: 153–162
  • Walsh S.M., Leake-Jones P.A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results. Hear Res 1982; 7: 281–304

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.