A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects

References

• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Kim Y., Suzuki Y., Fuse T., et al. Frequency specificity of amplitude-modulation following response detected by phase spectral analysis. Audiol 1993; 32: 293–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beagley H.A., Kellogg S.E. A comparison of evoked response and subjective auditory thresholds. Int Audiol 1969; 8: 345–353
   Google Scholar
• Coles R.R.A., Mason S.M. The results of cortical electrical response audiometry in medico-legal investigations. British J Audiol 1984; 18: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G., Ming W.J. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 173–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dauman R., Szyfter W., Charlet de Sauvage R., Cazals Y. Low frequency thresholds assessed with the 40 Hz MLR in adults with impaired hearing. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984; 240: 85–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R.A., Wilson M.J. Comparison of objective threshold estimation procedures for 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 299–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., Saemark K. Auditory magnetic fields. Source location and ‘tonotopic’ organisation in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Scan Audiol 1982; 11: 61–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths S.K., Chambers R. The amplitude modulation following response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 235–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes C.T., Feldman A. Evoked response thresholds for long and short duration tones. Audiology 1971; 10: 358–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Allyn and Bacon, BostonUSA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 2002; 15: 69–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone S.W., Norman G., Keogh I., Kelly V. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128: 257–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard M.A., Volkov I.O., Mirsky R., Garell P.C., Noh M.D., et al. Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus. J Comp Neurol 2000; 416: 79–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 281–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson J.T., Lombardi D.M., Gibbens N.D., Ahmad B.K., Newman C.W. The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of the multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 300–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi E.C., Folsom R.C., Dobie R.A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 1796: 81–96
   Google Scholar
• Lynn J.M., Lesner S.A., Sandridge S.A., Daddario C.C. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40 Hz evoked potential. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 366–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandless G.A., Best L. Summed evoked responses using pure-tone stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1966; 9: 266–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., Alain C., Woods D.L., John M.S., Scherg M., et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 64–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 177–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A., Perez-Abalo M.C., Van Roon P. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 140–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G., Stapells D.R., Picton T.W. The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; Suppl. 491: 153–160
   Google Scholar
• Prasher D., Mula M., Luxon L. Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: A comparison of noise induced hearing loss in Meniere's disease. J Laryngol and Otol 1993; 107: 780–786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. Evoked Potentials II, R.H. Nodar, C. Barber. Butterworths, Boston 1984; 163–168
   Google Scholar
• Rickards F.W., De Vidi S., McMahon D.S. Cortical evoked response audiometry in noise induced hearing loss claims. Aust J Otolaryng 1996; 2: 237–241
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez R., Picton T., Linden D., Hamel G., Laframboise G. Human auditory steady-state response: Effects of intensity and frequency. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 300–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D.E., Keating L.W., Hedgecock L.D., Schreurs K.K., Miller K.E. Arch Otolaryng 1971; 94: 347–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Linden D., Suffield J.B., Hamel G., Picton T.W. Human auditory steady-state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui B., Wong L.L.N., Wong E.C.M. Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 330–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A., Stapells D.R. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 613–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlades J.L., Perez-Abalo M.C., Martin V., Savio G., Soerra C., et al. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human head. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 28: 360–367
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich J.L., Cone-Wesson B.K. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory evoked potential. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 1526–1537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar