Auditory processing tests for Spanish-speaking adults: An initial study

References

• Arnst D.J. Errors on the staggered spondaic word (SSW) test in a group of adult normal listeners. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 112–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 1996; 5: 41–53
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. (Central) auditory processing disorders-the role of the audiologist. http://www.asha.org/nr/rdonlyres/8A2204DE-EE09-443C-98AA-3722C18214E3/0/v2PS_CAPD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baran J.A., Bothfeld R.W., Musiek F.E. Central auditory deficits associated with compromise of the primary auditory cortex. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 106–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baran J.A., Musiek F.E. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Contemporary perspectives in hearing assessment, F.E. Musiek, W.F. Rintelmann. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1999; 375–414
   Google Scholar
• Bellis T.J. Assessment and Management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting2^nd edition. Thomson, Clifton Park, NY 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C., Cassinari V. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol 1954; 44: 219–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P. & Weenink D. 2003. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [computer software and manual]. Retrieved November 10, 2003, from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. 2006. Auditory processing disorder. British Society of Audiology Steering Group: http//www.thebsa.org.uk/apd/Home.htm#working%20def.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron S., Barker R., Newall P. Development and evaluation of an Australian version of the pediatric speech intelligibility test for auditory processing disorder. Aust NZ J Audiol 2003; 25: 16–27
   Google Scholar
• Campbell N.G., Wilson W.J. The performance of South African English first language child speakers on a'low linguistically loaded' central auditory processing test protocol. S Afr J Commun Disord 2003; 50: 15–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak G.D., Musiek F.E. Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives. Singular, San Diego 1997
   Google Scholar
• Demanez L., Demanez J.P. Central auditory processing assessment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2003; 57: 243–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demanez L., Dony-Closon B., Lhonneux-Ledoux F., Demanez J.P. Central auditory processing assessment: A French-speaking battery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2003; 57: 275–290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desgualdo L.P., Schochat E. Processamento Auditivo Central, Manual de Avaliação. Lovise, São Paulo 1997
   Google Scholar
• Domitz D., Schow R. A new CAPD battery, Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol 2000; 9: 101–111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frisina D.R., Frisina R.D. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997; 106: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding M., Lilly D.J., Lay J.W. A staggered spondaic word (SSW) test for Australian use. Aust J Audiol 1996; 18: 81–88
   Google Scholar
• Golding M., Birtles G. Macquarie University Speech Tests. Macquarie University, Sydney 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K., Heiervang E., Nordby H., Smievoll A.I., Steinmetz H., et al. Central auditory processing, MRI morphometry and brain laterality: Applications to dyslexia. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 49: 26–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iliadou V., Kaprinis S. Clinical psychoacoustics in Alzheimer's disease central auditory processing disorders and speech deterioration. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003; 2: 12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8253-1:1989 Acoustics. Audiometric test methods-Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO, Geneva 1989
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92: 311–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger S., Jerger J. Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. Auditec, St. Louis 1984
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Musiek F. Report of the Consensus Conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 467–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous system. J Aud Res 1962; 2: 327–337
   Google Scholar
• Keith R. Development and standardization of SCAN-A Test of auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 286–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith R. Development and Standardization of SCAN-C Test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000a; 11: 438–445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith R. Random Gap Detection. Auditec, St. Louis 2000b
   Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol 1961; 15: 156–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn G.E., Gilroy J., Taylor P.C., Leiser R.P. Binaural masking-level differences in neurological disorders. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 357–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masquelier M.P. Management of auditory processing disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2003; 57: 301–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medwetsky L. Central auditory processing testing: A battery approach. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, th ed. Baltimore 2002; 510–524
   Google Scholar
• Miller G.A. The masking of speech. Psychol Bull 1947; 44: 105–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncrieff D., Jerger J., Wambacq I., Greenwald R., Black J. ERP evidence of a dichotic left-ear deficit in some dyslexic children. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 518–534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 79–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 265–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E. Central auditory tests. Scand Audiol, 28. Suppl 1999; 51: 33–46
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Baran J.A., Pinheiro M.L. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990; 29: 304–313
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Pinheiro M.L. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology 1987; 26: 79–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller H.G., Bright K. Monosyllabic Procedures in Central Testing. Handbook of Clinical Audiology4^th ed, J. Katz. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 222–238
   Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis K, Stollman M., Snik M., Van den Broek P. Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Audiology 2001; 40: 69–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neijenhuis K., Snik A., Priester G., Van Kordenoordt S., Van den Broek P. Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 334–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis K., Snik A., Van den Broek P. Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: Evaluation of a test battery. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 391–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffsinger D., Martinez C.D., Schaefer A. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesions. Scand Audiol 1982; 15: 81–93
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz K.Z., Pereira L.D., Borges A.C., Vilanova L.C. Staggered spondaic word test in epileptic patients. Sao Paulo Med J 2002; 120: 185–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro M. Tests of central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. Central auditory dysfunction, R. Keith. New York, Grune & Stratton. 1977; 223–256
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M.L., Musiek F.E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundation and clinical correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985
   Google Scholar
• Rosemblüt B., De Cruz J. Listas de palabras para pruebas de discriminación. Revista de Otorrinolaringología 1962; 22: 37–49
   Google Scholar
• Santos M.F.C., Pereira L.D. Escuta com digitos. Processamento Auditivo Central: Manual de avaliaçao, L.D. Pereira, E. Schochat. Lovise, São Paulo 1997; 147–149
   Google Scholar
• Sapir S., Maimon T., Eviatar Z. Linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing of rapid vowel formant (F2) modulations in university students with and without developmental dyslexia. Brain Cogn 2002; 48: 520–526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Haggard M.P. The clinical assessment of'Obscure Auditory Dysfunction’ (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 241–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte-Korne G., Deimel W., Bartling J., Remschmidt H. Auditory processing and dyslexia: Evidence for a specific speech processing deficit. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 337–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto H., Windham R. El test SSW. Manual de la versión en español. Auditec, St. Louis 1992
   Google Scholar
• Strouse A.L., Hall J.W., Burger M.C. Central auditory processing in Alzheimer's disease. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 230–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syntrillium Software Corporation. Cool Edit 2000. Syntrillium Software Corporation, ScottsdaleUSA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Tallal P., Stark R.E., Mellis E.D. Identification of language impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain Lang 1985; 25: 314–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varney N.R., Kubu C.S., Morrow L.A. Dichotic listening performances of patients with chronic exposure to organic solvents. Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 12: 107–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson L.K., Mueller H.G. Performance of normal hearing individuals on Auditec filtered speech tests. ASHA 1984; 26: 120
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Strouse A. Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment disc 2.0 [CD]. VA Medical Centres, Mountain HomeUSA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Moncrieff D.W., Townsend E.A., Pillion A.L. Development of a 500 Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar