References
- Au D.K.K. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Clin Otolaryngol 2003; 28: 533–38
- Barry J.G., Blamey P.J., Martin L.F.A., Lee K.Y-S., Tang T., et al. Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant. Clin Linguist Phon 2002; 16: 79–99
- Baumann U., Nobbe A. Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Hear Res 2004; 196: 49–57
- Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Nonspectral pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 60: 863–69
- Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70: 1655–60
- Busby P.A., Tong Y.C., Clark G.M. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 124–31
- Cazals Y., Pelizzone M., Saudan O., Boex C. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2048–54
- Ciocca V., Francis A.L., Aisha R., Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2250–56
- Dorman M.F., Ketten D. Adaptation by a cochlear-implant patient to upward shifts in the frequency representation of speech. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 457–60
- Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1053–64
- Fu Q-J., Shannon R.V. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 589–97
- Fu Q-J., Shannon R.V., Galvin J.J. Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1664–74
- Geurts L., Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 713–26
- Geurts L., Wouters J. Better place-coding of fundamental frequency in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 844–52
- Grant K., Summers V., Leek M. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1051–60
- Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 2155–64
- Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S., Macherey O. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2298–2310
- Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: Effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 375–85
- Hanna T. Discrimination and identification of modulation rate using a noise carrier. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2122–28
- Jones P.A., McDermott H.J., Seligman P.M., Millar J.B. Coding of voice source information in the nucleus cochlear implant system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104(Supp 165)363–65
- Jusczyk P.W. The Discovery of Spoken Language. MIT Press, CambridgeUSA 1997
- Kessler D.K. The Clarion multi-strategy cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108(Supp 177)8–16
- Klatt D.H., Klatt L.C. Analysis, synthesis and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 820–57
- Laneau J., Wouters J., Moonen M. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neuro-Otol 2006; 11: 38–52
- Lee K.Y.S., van Hasselt C.A., Chiu S.N., Cheung D.M.C. Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 63: 137–47
- McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., Clark G.M. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2664–73
- Peng S-C., Tomblin J.B., Cheung H., Lin Y-S., Wang L-S. Perception and production of Mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 251–63
- Shannon R. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2156–64
- Shannon R.V., Zeng F-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995; 270: 303–4
- Vandali A.E., Sucher C., Tsang D.J., McKay C.M., Chew J.W.D., et al. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 3126–38
- Wei C-G., Cao K., Zeng F-G. Mandarin tone recognition in Chinese cochlear-implant subjects. Hear Res 2004; 197: 87–95
- Wiegrebe L., Patterson R.D. Quantifying the distortion products generated by amplitude modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 2709–18
- Wilson B. The future of cochlear implants. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 205–25
- Zeng F-G. Temporal pitch in electrical hearing. Hear Res 2002; 174: 101–6