Auditory processing disorders, verbal disfluency, and learning difficulties: A case study

References

• Arehole S. A preliminary study of the relationship between long latency response and learning disorder. Br J Audiol 1995; 29: 295–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHA, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 1996; 5: 41–54
   Google Scholar
• Barasch C.T., Guitar B., McCaulet R.J., Absher R.G. Disfluency and time perception. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43: 1429–1439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellis T.J. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice2nd edition. Thomson Delmar Learning, Toronto 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bérard C. 1993. Normes du SSW en français. Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies. MontrealCanada.
   Google Scholar
• Blood I.M., Blood G.W. Relation between stuttering severity and brainstem-evoked response testing. Percept Mot Skills 1984; 59: 935–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodstein O. 1995. A Handbook on Stuttering (5th ed.). San Diego: Singular Pub. Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B., Dey A.N. Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Children: National Health Interview Survey, 2004. Vital Health Stat 2004; 10: 1–94
   Google Scholar
• Cacace A., McFarland D.J. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 355–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D., Musiek F.E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. Singular Publishing Group, Inc, San Diego 1997
   Google Scholar
• Corbera S., Corral M.-J., Escera C., Idiazábal M.A. Abnormal speech sound representation in persistent developmental stuttering. Neurology 2005; 65: 1246–1252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs D.W., Crum M.A. Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 702–714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezrati-Vinacour R., Levin I. Time estimation by adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 144–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs D., Cooper E.B. Prevalence of communication disorders in students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1989; 22: 60–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Public Law 108–446, 108th Congress, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Musiek F.E. Report on the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 467–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Speaks C., Tramel J. A new approach to speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Dis 1968; 33: 318–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jirsa R.E. Clinical efficacy of electrophysiologic measures in APD management programs. Seminars in Hearing 2002; 23: 349–355
   Google Scholar
• Jirsa R.E., Clontz K.B. Long latency auditory event-related potentials form children with auditory processing disorders. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 222–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 1978. SSW Workshop Manual. Buffalo, New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Katz J., Wilde L. Auditory processing disorders. Handbook of Clinical Audiology4th ed., J. Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 490–502
   Google Scholar
• Khedr E., El-Nasser W.A., Haleem E.K.A., Bakr M.S., Trakhan M.N. Evoked potentials and electroencephalography in stuttering. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000; 52: 178–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967; 3: 163–178
   Google Scholar
• Kramer M.B., Green D., Guitar B. A comparison of stutterers and non-stutterers on masking level differences and synthetic sentence identification tasks. J Commun Disord 1987; 20: 379–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Koch D.B., McGee T.J., Nicol T.G., Cunningham J. Speech-sound discrimination in school-age children: Psychological and neurophysiologic measures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1042–1060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Smith D.I., McGee T. Midline and temporal lobe MLRs in the guinea pig originate from different generator systems: A conceptual framework for new and existing data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 70: 541–558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch A. & Normandin N. 1983. SSI: Élaboration d'une version française et application aurpès d'une population d'enfants avec troubles d'apprentissage. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McGee T., Kraus N., Littman T., Nicol T. Contributions of medial geneculate body subdivisions to the middle latency response. Hear Res 1992; 61: 147–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller A.R., Jannetta P.J. Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982a; 53: 612–620
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller A.R., Jannetta P.J. Auditory evoked potentials recorded intracranially from the brain stem in man. Exp Neurol 1982b; 78: 144–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J.K. The human brain stem as a generator of auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res 1987; 29: 33–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 265–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity (MMN): Perspectives for application. Int J Psychophysiol 2000; 37: 3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Escera C. Mismatch negativity: Clinical and other applications. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 105–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö., Kraus N. Auditory middle-latency responses in humans. Audiology 1983; 22: 34–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W. The P300 wave in the human event-related potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 9: 456–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M.L. Tests of central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. Central Auditory Dysfunction, R.W. Keith. Grune & Stratton, New York 1977; 43–68
   Google Scholar
• Purdy S.C., Kelly A.S., Davies M.G. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 367–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringel R., Minifie F.D. Protensity estimates of stutterers and non-stutterers. J Speech Hear Res 1966; 9: 289–296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudmin F., Normandin N. Experimental dichotic tests in French modeled on SSW design. Human Communication Canada 1983; 3: 348–360
   Google Scholar
• Salmelin R., Schintzler A., Schmitz F., Jäncke Witte O.W., et al. Functional organization of the auditory cortex is different in stutterers and fluent speakers. NeuroReport 1998; 9: 2225–2229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M., Vajsar J., Picton T.W. A source analysis of late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 336–355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toscher M.M., Rupp R.R. A study of the central auditory processes in stutterers using the synthetic sentence identification (SSI) test battery. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 779–792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education 2000. Twenty-second Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walker M.M., Shinn J.B., Cranford J.L., Givens G.D., Holbert D. Auditory temporal processing performance of young adults with reading disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45: 598–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne M., Boehmler R.M. Central auditory function in fluent and disfluent normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 54–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar