Auditory and verbal working memory deficits in a child with congenital aniridia due to a PAX6 mutation

References

• Bamiou D.E., Musiek F.E., Sisodiya S.M., Free S., Davies R.A., et al. Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations. Ann Neurol 2004; 56: 503–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banich M.T. The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 1998; 36: 128–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellis, T. 2003. ( 2nd Ed.) Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice. Canada: Thompson Delmar Learning
   Google Scholar
• Boatman D., Vining E.P., Freeman J., Carson B. Auditory processing studied prospectively in two hemidecorticectomy patients. J Child Neurol 2003; 18: 228–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. 1981. Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol, 15, 213–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan D.C., Waterhouse G.J., West S.C., Jr. A proposed neurophysiological basis of alexithymia. Psychother Psychosom 1980; 34: 248–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiez J.A. Bridging the gap between neuroimaging and neuropsychology: Using working memory as a case study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001; 23: 19–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici A.D., Alter K. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain Langu 2004; 89: 267–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K. Attentional modulation of interhemispheric transfer: A two-channel threshold model. The parallel brain. The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus callosum, E. Zaidel, M. Iacoboni. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2003; 307–318
   Google Scholar
• Hurley R.M., Musiek F.E. Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 195–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L., López-Bendito G., Gruss P., Stoykova A., Molnar Z. Pax6 is required for the normal development of the forebrain axonal connections. Development 2002; 129: 5041–5052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D.T., Ryan S., Bray P. A guide to the effective use of Otoacoustic Emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepore, F,. Lassonde, M. & Poirier, P. 1994. Midline sensory integration in callosal agenesis. In:. M. Lassonde & M.A. Jeeves ( eds.) Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain. Advances in Behavioural Biology, vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lessard N., Leporé F., Villemagne J., Lassonde M. Sound localization in callosal agenesis and early callosotomy subjects: Brain reorganization and/or compensatory strategies. Brain 2002; 125: 1039–1053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell T.N., Free S.L., Williamson K.A., Stevens J.M., Churchill A.J., et al. Polymicrogyria and absence of pineal gland due to PAX6 mutation. Ann Neurol 2003; 53: 658–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Baran J.A., Pinheiro M.L. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990; 29: 304–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Gollegly K.M., Kibbe K.S., Verkest-Lenz S.B. Proposed screening test for central auditory disorders: Follow-up on the dichotic digits test. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 109–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Pinheiro M.L. Dichotic speech tests in the detection of central auditory dysfunction. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates, M.L. Pinheiro, F.F. Musiek. Wakerly Press, Baltimore 1985; 201–218
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Reeves A. Effects of partial and complete corpus callosotomy on central auditory function. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum, F. Leporè, M. Ptito, H.H. Jasper. Alan Liss, New York 1986; 423–434
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Shinn J., Jirsa R., Bamiou D.E., Baran J., et al. GIN (Gaps-in-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 608–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 79–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Gollegly K.M., Ross M.K. Profile of types of central auditory processing disorders in children with learning disabilities. J Childhood Com Dis 1985; 9: 43–63
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Pinheiro M.L. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem and cerebral lesions. Audiology 1987; 26: 79–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noffsinger D., Martinez C.D., Wilson R.H. Dichotic listening to speech: Background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 248–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandya D.N., Seltzer B. The topography of commissural fibers. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum, F. Leporé, M. Ptito, H.H. Jasper. Alan Liss, New York 1986; 47–73
   Google Scholar
• Passarotti A.M., Banich T.M., Sood R.K., Wong J.M. A generalized role of interhemipsheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: Evidence from the auditory and tactile modalities. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 1082–1096
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul L.K., Van Lancker-Sidtis D., Schieffer B., Dietrich R., Brown W.S. Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Nonliteral language and affective prosody. Brain Langu 2003; 85: 313–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M.L., Musiek F.E. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates, M.L. Pinheiro, F.E. Musiek. Wakerly Press, Baltimore 1985; 219–238
   Google Scholar
• Santhouse A.M., Ffytche D.H., Howard R.J., Williams S.C., Stewart A.L., et al. The functional significance of perinatal corpus callosum damage: An fMRI study in young adults. Brain 2002; 125: 1782–1792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sisodiya S.M., Free S.L., Williamson K.A., Mitchell T.N., Willis C., et al. PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet 2001; 28: 214–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talamillo A., Quinn J.C., Collinson J.M., Caric D., Price D.J., et al. Pax6 regulates regional development and neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex. Dev Biol 2003; 255: 151–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Temple C.M., Jeeves M.A., Vilarroya O.O. Reading in callosal agenesis. Brain Lang 1990; 39: 235–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P.J., Mitchell S.L., Free S.L., Williamson K.A., Hanosn I.M., et al. Cognitive functioning in humans with mutations of the PAX6 gene. Neurology 2004; 64: 1216–1218
   Google Scholar
• Tzoulaki I., White I.M., Hanson I.M. PAX6 mutations: Genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet 2005; 6: 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heyningen V., Williamson K.A. PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11: 1161–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wexler B.E., Halwes T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 1983; 21: 59–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel E. Callosal dynamics and right hemisphere language. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum, F. Leporè, M. Ptito, H.H. Jasper. Alan Liss, New York 1986; 436–461
   Google Scholar